400 likes | 1.05k Views
UPDATE ON GCIG TRIALS FOR EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER Christian Marth. Closed Trials. EORTC 55971. Upfront Surgery vs Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Patients closed / 550 Leading EORTC Participating NCIC CTG Presentated at IGCS 2008. in press. Tarceva Trial EORTC 55041.
E N D
UPDATE ON GCIG TRIALS FOR EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER Christian Marth
EORTC 55971 Upfront Surgery vs Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Patients closed / 550 Leading EORTC Participating NCIC CTG Presentated at IGCS 2008 in press
Tarceva Trial EORTC 55041 Tarceva consolidation 2 years Primary Chemotherapy Control Patients closed / 835 Leading EORTC Participating AGO-AUSTRIA, ANZGOG, GINECO, MRC/NCIC, MANGO
ICON-7 TC ± BEVACIZUMAB Patients closed / 1520 Leading MRC/NCRI Participating NCIC CTG, AGO OVAR, GINECO, GEICO EORTC, ANZGOG, NSGO
GOG 218 CT vs CT + Bevacizumab Placebo vs CT + Bevacizumab concurrent and extended Patients closed / 1800 Leading GOG Participating ECOG, NCCTG, NSABP, SWOG
Calypso Published Ahead of Print on May 24, 2010
AGO-OVAR-9 Carbo Paclitaxel +/- Gemcitabine Patients closed 1742 Leading AGO-OVAR Participating GINECO, NSGO, in press
SCOTROC 4 Carbo Flat Dosing vs Intrapatient Dose Escalation Patients closed 932 Leading SGCTG Participating ANZGOG Manuscript in preparation
HECTOR Carbo Topo vs Chemo (CT or CG) in recurrent Platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer Patients closed 550 Leading NOGGO/AGO-OVAR Participating AGO-AUSTRIA, GEICO
AGO-OVAR-OP.2 DESKTOP II Evaluation of predictive factors for complete resection in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer Patients closed/412 Leading AGO-OVAR Participating AGO-AUSTRIA, MITO, selected Canadian+Australian centers Report IGCS 2008, in preparation
AGO-OVAR-12 Carbo Paclitaxel +/- BIBF 1120 (Vargatef) Patients 146 / 1300 (2:1 random) Leading AGO-OVAR Participating AGO-Austria, BGOG, GINECO, MANGO, MITO, NSGO, US Oncology
AGO-OVAR 16 Pazopanib consolidation 1 yr First Line Chemotherapy Control Patients 752 / 900 Leading AGO-OVAR Participating AGOAustria, ANZGOG, BGOG, GEICO, GINECO, ICORG, JGOG, KGOG, MANGO, MITO, NSGO, US-Sites: California Consortium, NY GOG, SWOG
AGO – OVAR OP.3 (LION) Lymphadenectomy In Ovarian Neoplasms epithelial invasive ovarian cancer FIGO IIB - IV ECOG 0/1 and no CI against LNE no visible extra- and intra-abdominal tumor residuals no bulky lymph nodes System. Lymphadenectomy • pelvic • para-aortic R 184/640 no Lymphadenectomy Endpoints: OS, PFS, QoL Strata: centre, PS ,age Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
JGOG-3017 Clear Cell Carcinoma CT vs CDDP + Irinotecan Patients 541 / 600 Leading JGOG Participating GINECO, GOG, KGOG, MITO, SGCTG
MITO-7 Weekly CT vs 3-weekly CT (QoL) Patients 227 / 400 Leading MITO Participating MaNGO
MITO-8 LipDox vs CT cross-over in 6-12 m platinum-free interval Patients 46 / 253 Leading MITO Participating MaNGO, AGO-OVAR
Aurelia Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with platinum-resistant EOC Patients 110 / 332 Leading GINECO Participating AGO-OVAR, GEICO, MITO, NSGO
AGO-OVAR-OP.4 DESKTOP III Cytoreductive surgery vs NO surgery in platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC Patients 0 / 385 activated June 1 Leading AGO-OVAR Participating ?
CHORUS Upfront Surgery vs Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Patients 535 / 550 Leading MRC Participating
ICON6A Randomised Trial of Concurrent Cediranib (with Platinum-based Chemotherapy) and Maintenance Cediranib in Women with Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer
mEOC A multicentre randomised factorial trial comparing oxaliplatin + capecitabine, bevacizumab and carboplatin + paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated mucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (mEOC) mEOC is an intergroup study with two identical protocols from GOG and NCRI with a single analysis Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre
mEOC/GOG#241 2x2 Factorial Trial Design Mucinous ovarian cancer FIGO stages II–IV OR recurrent stage I; No previous chemotherapy; >18yrs; PS=0-2 Randomise (332 patients – 83 patients in each arm) Oxaliplatin & Capecitabine 6 cycles q 21d Bevacizumab 15mg/kg q3 w 5 or 6* cycles Carboplatin & Paclitaxel 6 cycles q 21d Oxaliplatin & Capecitabine 6 cycles q 21d Oxaliplatin & Capecitabine 6 cycles q 21d Bevacizumab 15mg/kg q3 w 5 or 6* cycles Clinical assessment every 6 weeks for 36 weeks Telephone call at week 3 between every 6-week visit Bevacizumab 15mg/kg q3 weeks for 12 cycles Clinical assessment every 6 weeks for 36 weeks Response assessment: CT scans are carried out post cycle 3 of chemo, 1 month after completion of cycle 6, then 3 monthly for Year 1 Follow up: 3 monthly years 1-2, 6 monthly years 3-5 *Bevacizumab can be omitted from the first cycle of if chemotherapy must be started within 4 weeks of surgery.
An international three-stage randomised trial of dose-fractionated chemotherapy compared to standard three-weekly chemotherapy, following immediate primary surgery or as part of delayed primary surgery, for women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer.
ARM1: C q 3/52 P q 3/52 (current std) Surgery (IPS) Chemotherapy 6 cycles ARM2: C q 3/52 P q 1/52 Randomisation ARM3: C q 1/52 P q 1/52 Chemotherapy (x 3) Surgery (DPS) Chemotherapy ( x 3) (A) Immediate Primary Surgery (IPS) One trial with pre-specified stratification for IPD v DPS (B) Delayed Primary Surgery (DPS) • Cycle 3 administered as standard 3-weekly cycle in all patients for DPS
Arm 1- Carboplatin AUC5 q3w Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 q3w (standard of care) Arm 2- Carboplatin AUC5 q3w Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 q1w (JGOG 3016 regimen) Arm 3- Carboplatin AUC2 q1w Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 q1w 1485 women recruited over 3 years Treatment Regimens
International randomised phase III study of a PARP inhibitor versus liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan for ovarian cancer patients relapsing following previous platinum therapy and carrying a deleterious germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation 540 patients over 4.5 years with 1 yr FU • Primary variable: • PFS • Secondary variables: • ORR by RECIST • Ca125 response (GCIG) • OS
iPocc Trial IntraPeritoneal therapy for Ovarian Cancer with Carboplatin (GOTIC-001 / JGOG3019) A Randomized Phase II/III Trial of 3 Weekly Intraperitoneal versus Intravenous Carboplatin in Combination with Intravenous Weekly Dose-Dense Paclitaxel for Newly Diagnosed Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Cancer Study Chair Keiichi Fujiwara Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
Schema Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Stages II-IV Including Bulky Tumor RANDOMIZATION Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV Day1,8,15 Carboplatin AUC 6 IP Q21, 6-8 Cycles Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV Day1,8,15 Carboplatin AUC 6 IV Q21, 6-8 Cycles Dose dense−TCiv Dose dense−TCip Primary Endpoint: PFS Secondary Endpoint: OS, Toxicity, QOL Accrual Goal: 746 pts / 511 events
NCIG CTG OV21 Patients with EOC 3-4 cycles neoadjuvant chemo Initial surgery: < 1 cm residual 3 cycles d1 IV Carbo/Taxol 3 cycles IP/IV d1 CDDP/Carbo IP and Taxol IV d8 IP Taxol 60mg/m2 d8 IV Taxol 60mg/m2 Endpoints: PFS and OS
Diagnostic biomarkers Patients diagnosed with EOC 3-4 cycles neoadjuvant chemo Markers of primary chemoresistance Primary surgery:> 1 cm residual Or patient not entered in OV21 Primary surgery: < 1 cm residual OV21 patient No surgery +/_ progressive disease Specific markers for IP vs. IV Disease progression Markers for acquired chemoresistance
OVATYON Relapsed ovarian cancer (n=588) with platinum-free interval (PFI) of 6-12 months Randomization (strata: ECOG, Measurable disease, PFI) PLD 30 mg/m2 1 hour i.v. + Carboplatin AUC 5 30-60 min i.v. on day 1 q4weeks Up to 6 cycles or progression PLD 30 mg/m2 1 hour i.v. + Trabectedin 1.1 mg/m2 3 hoour i.v. on day 1 q3weeks Up to 6 cycles or progression 3rd line chemotherapy: at investigator discretion 3rd line chemotherapy: platinum rechallenge