1 / 12

Mihalovich Vs. Campero

Mihalovich Vs. Campero. Should the Lincoln High School Football coach be fired?. Background Information. “The reason I don’t go to the Varsity games at Lincoln is because they get (expletive) destroyed when they play half-decent teams.”

ziva
Download Presentation

Mihalovich Vs. Campero

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mihalovich Vs. Campero Should the Lincoln High School Football coach be fired?

  2. Background Information “The reason I don’t go to the Varsity games at Lincoln is because they get (expletive) destroyed when they play half-decent teams.” Dante Campero (former Lincoln High Sophomore football player)

  3. Background Information Punished for the tweet Read tweet to varsity squad Additional Physical Conditioning

  4. Tom Mihalovich should be fired Engaged in conduct unbecoming to a district employee. Mihalovich “bullied” Campero Conditioning acted as corporal punishment

  5. Tom Mihalovich should be fired Broke Anti-Bulling Policy again Mihalovich was hostile toward Campero Campero received threats “Place the student in reasonable fear of harm to the student’s person or property.”

  6. Tom Mihalovich was Innocent • Policies “broken” were unknown or created after • Mihalovich is a great role model for the players • http://www.desmoinesregister.com/VideoNetwork/1831249787001/Rally-for-Lincoln-football-coach-Tom-Mihalovich • Punishment was meant to help build character

  7. Tom Mihalovich was Innocent People being too sensitive Every Coach swears and conditioning for punishment is common Reason for troubled youth

  8. Mediation Sense of team unity and betterment of players Intention of punishment meant to teach Had to be accepted back into the team “Community Service” for team Taking equipment or clean locker room

  9. Mediation Did not want a situation to happen again Explain to Mihalovich Place under supervision Possible Suspension

  10. Works Cited Miller, Bryce, and Andy Hamilton. “Report Condemns Lincoln Football Coach as Southside Rallies in His Support.” Des Moines Register. Des Moines Register, 28 Oct. 2012. Web. 29 Oct. 2012. Miller, Bryce. “Tom Mihalovich Parting at Lincoln Was Inevitable.” Des Moines Register. Des Moines Register, 11 Oct. 2012. Web. 29 Oct. 2012. Finney, Daniel P. “Use of Running for Sports Discipline Questioned.” USA Today. USA Today, 6 Oct. 2012. Web. 29 Oct. 2012. Kennedy, Laura Oliver. Comment to article “Use of Running for Sports Discipline Questioned.” USA Today, 8 Oct. 2012. Web. 29 Oct. 2012. Hamilton, Andy and Mary Stegmeir. “Lincoln’s Tom Mihalovich: ‘Rules Were Made Up’.” Des Moines Register. Des Moines Register, 30 Oct. 2012. Web. 31 Oct. 2012. Easton, Amanda and Steve Garrison. “Personnel Investigation of an Alleged Violation of Anti-Bullying and Anti-Harassment Policy, Corporal Punishment and Allegations of Conduct Unbecoming.” 2012. Des Moines Register. Web. 29 Oct. 2012. Rally for Lincoln Football Coach Tom Mihalovich. The Des Moines Register. 2012. Web. 6 Nov. 2012. Symbol of Lincoln High School. N.d. Lincoln Public School District Website. Web. 6 Nov. 2012.

  11. Grading Rubric Name & Section : Watts, MB

  12. Response Team Reflection on Patrick Watts Patrick Watts’ presentation was about a high school coach that got fired over a punishment that was given to one of his players. To discuss his clarity, Hall and Hackett both agreed that he did a nice job. Hackett thought he he had a ”good tone” and “knew what he was talking about” (Hackett). Hall thought that he “explained what the anti-bullying act, corporal punishment [were]” very well and made everyone in the know that was listening. However, Gove thought that Watts had a “lot’s of filler words” and thought it was important for him to how to pronounce “Expletive”. The visual element of Watts’ presentation was “excellent” in Hackett’s eyes. As Hall said it Watts’ “Gave main points and spoke more in depth...” and Hackett agrees with that (Hall & Hackett). Gove thought it was a good presentation but he did say that Watts’ could have made more eye contact with the audience. The sonic element of his presentation was across the board; Hackett, Hall and Gove all agree that he spoke with clarity and confidence. A few minor details would be that “his hands in his pockets made it seem more that he was a passive speaker, instead of a interactive one” (Gove). Watts’ “was very descriptive in the details of what happened. And the chronological order he presented the information was a good strength.” (Hall). Hackett thought that it would have been an even better presentation if the video worked, but that was beyond his control in the amounted time. A thoughtful job, covering all the necessary issues, & in fact bringing up one point I hadn’t noticed. Plusses all around.

More Related