1 / 19

NCHRP 20-68: Motivation … Interactions and Exchange

NCHRP Project 20-68A/B/C U.S. Domestic Scan Program Report to the AASHTO Highway Subcommittee on Maintenance July 18, 2011 Andrew Lemer (NCHRP) Lori Rosenkopf (Wharton). NCHRP 20-68: Motivation … Interactions and Exchange. Personal Contact Information exchange

ziven
Download Presentation

NCHRP 20-68: Motivation … Interactions and Exchange

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NCHRP Project 20-68A/B/CU.S. Domestic Scan ProgramReport to theAASHTOHighway Subcommittee on MaintenanceJuly 18, 2011Andrew Lemer (NCHRP)Lori Rosenkopf (Wharton)

  2. NCHRP 20-68: Motivation … Interactions and Exchange • Personal Contact • Information exchange • Knowledge networks • Virtual communities • Innovation

  3. NCHRP 20-68: Key Steps … Varied Techniques • Select Topics and Refine Scopes AASHTO and NCHRP • Conduct and Document Scans (3 scan types) Scan Teams, Contractor, Innovator-Hosts • Disseminate Results (reports, webinars, missionary work, other) NCHRP, FHWA, Scan-team Members, TRB, Others

  4. NCHRP 20-68: Domestic Scan Program Direction

  5. NCHRP 20-68: Domestic Scan Program Direction • 20-68 Project Panel • "Skip" Paul, LaDOTD(chair) • Shane Brown, WA State University • Nancy Chinlund, CalTrans • Marsha Fiol, VaDOT • Rick Kreider, KS DOT • Glenn Roberts, NH DOT • Amy Schutzbach, IL DOT • Mark VanPortFleet, MI DOT • “Mike” Burk, FHWA liaison • Keith Platte & Marty Vitale, AASHTO liaisons

  6. NCHRP 20-68A: Domestic Scan History • Apr ‘05: SCOR approved concept ($250,000 FY ’05) • July ‘05: Business Plan completed (Cambridge Systematics, Inc.) • Nov ‘06: Pilot scans (2) completed • (reports published as web documents; FHWA support +$75,000) • Dec ‘07: Full program initiated (Arora and Associates, Inc.; 6-yr contract) • 6 annual funding increments through FY 2012: $3M+ ($500,000/yr for scans, $3.0 million total + FHWA support, $224,000) • Program will continue, contingent on future funding and evaluation research

  7. NCHRP 20-68A: Domestic Scan Products

  8. NCHRP 20-68B/C: Impact Assessment and Enhancement • FY ‘09 $200,000*  NCHRP 20-68B/C • Assess the impact, cost-effectiveness of domestic scans • Explore alternatives to team-travel-based scan • Enhance dissemination  community of innovators, networks of innovation • * In addition to $3M+ used for scan activities.

  9. NCHRP 20-68B/C: Scan Impact and Cost Effectiveness Personal contact Innovation Diffusion: an often crooked path Scans bring people together Tony’s DOT saved $10 million in the 1st year of full rollout MDSS for winter maintenance operations Terry Tony

  10. NCHRP 20-68B/C: Scan Alternatives • Type 1 of 3: Traditional scan

  11. NCHRP 20-68B/C: Scan Alternatives • Type 2 scan

  12. NCHRP 20-68B/C: Scan Alternatives • Type 3 scan

  13. NCHRP 20-68B/C: Dissemination, Innovation Networks • To Date… • 7+2 scans completed • 12 topics in execution and programmed • 94 state DOT-staff team members, from 49 states • 35 states provided info to scan teams, hosted scans • 6 post-scan 6-month assessments • Scan-team social web site operational • Innovation-tracing research ongoing

  14. NCHRP 20-68B/C: Dissemination, Innovation Networks • www.domesticscan.org www.trb.org NCHRP 20-68A

  15. Research Questions: NCHRP 20-68C: Innovation Networks • How do DOTslearn about and implement innovations; how do we compare with others; can we do better? • Is the NCHRP Domestic Scan Program cost-effective; how can we do better? • What can we learn about what factors encourage innovation awareness and implementation? Innovation Awareness Networks and Relationships Innovation Initiation DOT Effectiveness Successful Implementation. • Organizational and Individual Factors, e.g., • Culture, personality…

  16. NCHRP 20-68C: The Survey • We need your support & your DOTs’ participation • Identify and recruit the right respondents • Ensure timely responses • Help us get the story straight

  17. NCHRP 20-68C: The Survey • The right respondents: headquarters and districts • Timely responses: Aug/Sept timeframe • On-line, 20-30 minutes • Incentives (Leadership encouragement, iPad2 lottery)

  18. NCHRP Project 20-68CU.S. Domestic Scan ProgramMaintenance Innovation Survey Lori Rosenkopf (Wharton)lori.rosenkopf@gmail.com215.718.5107Andy Lemer (NCHRP)Discussion, Questions?

More Related