1 / 10

ROSCOE Status

ROSCOE Status. IT-GS Group Meeting Focus on POW November 2009. What is ROSCOE?. Robust Scientific Communities for EGI INFRA-2010-1.2.3—Virtual Research Communities Which means we don’t say “SSC” anymore! Many partners, many disciplines:

zizi
Download Presentation

ROSCOE Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ROSCOE Status IT-GS Group Meeting Focus on POW November 2009

  2. What is ROSCOE? • Robust Scientific Communities for EGI • INFRA-2010-1.2.3—Virtual Research Communities • Which means we don’t say “SSC” anymore! • Many partners, many disciplines: • Mature Virtual Research Communities (VRC) within ROSCOE are High-Energy Physics, Life Sciences, Computational Chemistry & Material Science Technology, and Computer Science & Engineering. • ROSCOE targets three nascent communities: Photon Science concerning users of synchrotron radiation (light) sources, Complexity Science concerning the analysis of complex, interconnected systems, and Humanities. • ROSCOE safeguards current international scientific collaboration, expands that collaboration to new scientific disciplines, and prepares existing and nascent communities to be reliable, stable partners within EGI ecosystem, thereby maximizing the scope and impact of their scientific work.

  3. What’s in ROSCOE? • 3 NA WPs, 3 SA WPs and at least one JRA • Lead partner is CNRS – Cal Loomis • We’re in NA2/3 (un-funded) & SA1-3 (almost un-funded (30% “officially”…))

  4. Project Overview CERN: € 900K= 3 fellows for 3 years + travel & overheads

  5. NA2 – VRC Coordination • Objectives • Coordinate VRC activities • Liaise with other EGI activities and EGI-related projects • Liaise with NGIs about deployment of services and provision of resources • Facilitate sharing of resources • Develop and implement VRC policy and procedures • Develop sustainability and exploitation plans • Evaluate technical and scientific impact • Effort: CERN (liaison to WLCG and other HEP coordination bodies): 0.5 FTE, un-funded; OSLO (liaison to EMI): 0.5 FTE, co-funded. • We’ve minimized this to reduce overhead whilst retaining the possibility to use (minimal) travel funds for named suspects

  6. NA3 – Dissemination & Training • Objectives • Coordinate dissemination activities • Disseminate VRC activities within the targeted VRC communities • Coordinate training activities • Coordinate participation in general training events • Provide focused training events for VRC communities • Coordinate VRC participation in EGI User Conferences • Organize ROSCOE participation in strategic non-EGI conferences • CERN will coordinate the HEP contribution to this activity (0.5 FTE, unfunded). • Same comments as for NA2

  7. SA1 – User Support • Objectives • Create and maintain targeted documentation • Provide support concerning use of the grid infrastructure • Provide user support for domain-specific services and applications • Provide intensive debugging support for operational problems • Contribute to the treatment of user support tickets • Investigate novel mechanisms for providing user support • Support for the evaluation and testing of pre-production services • Operational support for all of the tasks above for the LHC experiments will be provided by CERN (2 FTEs, co-funded), INFN (2 FTEs, co-funded) and UIO (0.5 FTEs, co-funded). • GSI will provide operational support for all of the above tasks for the FAIR community (2 FTE co-funded) • DESY will provide operational support for all of the above tasks for the ILC community (1 FTE co-funded) • CESNET will investigate generic and sustainable implementation of LHC data analysis (Tier3) support (1 FTE, co-funded)

  8. SA2 – Scientific Gateways • Objectives • Operate existing portals during evolution to accepted portal implementation(s) • Maintain documentation, information, and news on VRC portal • Ensure that the VRC portal functions effectively for the target community • Extend functionality of VRC portal to meet needs of the community • Manage transition to common scientific gateway implementation • K? • A gateway should encompass the following functionality: • Documentation, information, and contacts • Events/News • Monitoring view of activity within the VRC/VO • Monitoring of services • Access to and management of data • Access to grid services • Effort: CERN (2 FTEs co-funded)

  9. SA3 – Targeted Application Porting • Objectives • Port example applications covering common use cases. • Port strategic applications with high scientific, social, or economic impact. • Interface common analysis frameworks or APIs with grid infrastructure. • Optimize and maintain common scientific libraries for the grid infrastructure. • Effort (Ganga support and evolution): CERN (1 FTE co-funded), IC (1 FTE co-funded), BHAM (1 FTE, co-funded), UIO (1 FTE, co-funded), DESY (1FTE co-funded) • Effort (Integration of LHC experiments frameworks): INFN (2 FTEs, co-funded), CERN (1 FTE, co-funded)

  10. Summary • CERN hopes to get funding for 3 fellows, plus travel and “overheads” • There will be a non-zero price to pay… • Taken alone? Taken together with EGI InSPIRE? • Value of funding to partners should not be ignored / under-estimated • e.g. D.A.S.; possibility of 4 INFN “fellows” at CERN • It looks like this will remain stable until negotiation phase – assuming we get there…

More Related