160 likes | 270 Views
Superbubbles, Wolf-Rayet Stars, and the Origin of Galactic Cosmic Rays. W.R. Binns, M.H. Israel, L.M. Scott: Washington University M.E. Wiedenbeck: Jet Propulsion Laboratory A.C. Cummings, J.S. George, R.A. Leske, R.A. Mewaldt, E.C. Stone: Caltech
E N D
Superbubbles, Wolf-Rayet Stars, and the Origin of Galactic Cosmic Rays W.R. Binns, M.H. Israel, L.M. Scott:Washington University M.E. Wiedenbeck: Jet Propulsion Laboratory A.C. Cummings, J.S. George, R.A. Leske, R.A. Mewaldt, E.C. Stone: Caltech T.T. von Rosenvinge: Goddard Space Flight Center M. Arnould, S. Goriely: Institut d’Astronomie et d’Astrophysique, Bruxelles
Outline • Introduction—Cosmic Ray Source models • Superbubbles formed from OB associations as possible source of galactic cosmic rays • Wolf-Rayet (WR) Stars • as source of enhancement of certain isotopic ratios: e.g. 22Ne/20Ne, 58Fe/56Fe • The CRIS experiment • Instrument • Isotopic measurements • WR component as tracer of galactic cosmic ray source • Comparison of data with WR model calculations • Suggested scenario for cosmic ray origin • Conclusions
Cosmic Ray Source? • Stellar atmosphere injection (e.g. Meyer, Shapiro) • Low-FIP elements enhanced (as in the solar corona). • Interstellar grain source (Most recently Meyer et al.) • Refractory elements enhanced • Mass dependence for volatile elements • Acceleration of material in superbubbles by SN shocks • Higdon et al. ApJ To be pub., Aug. 2005; ApJ 590 (2003) 822; ApJ 509 (1998) L33; Lingenfelter et al. ApJL 500 (1998) L153. • Streitmatter et al. A&A 143 (1985) 249. • Supernova material • Wind material from massive stars
Superbubbles & Supernovae • Superbubbles blown by stellar winds & SN in OB associations • Superbubble size: ~100-1000 pc • The majority of core-collapse SN (80-90%) in our galaxy occur in superbubbles (Higdon & Lingenfelter). • Mean time between SN within OB assoc.~106y • SN shocks accelerate ambient superbubble material ~100 pc diameter Superbubble in Perseus Arm Superbubble (N 70) in the Large Magellanic Cloud (ESO-VLT image)
Wolf-Rayet Stars • Evolutionary phase of massive O & B type stars exist primarily in OB associations • WR Mass—15-45 M⊙ • High velocity surface winds (~1,000-4,000 km/s) eject material into the ISM • Often are dusty and ~>60% are binaries—puzzle how dust can exist in such a hot environment • Two phases—WN and WC • WN--CNO processed material is ejected with production of high 13C/12C and 14N/16O ratios • WC--Wind enrichment of He-burning products: esp. C, O, and 22Ne through reaction 14N(,)18F(e+)18O(,)22Ne Diam~0.2pc WR-124 in Sagittarius—Hubble Image Diam~200au WR-104 in Sagittarius—Keck Telescope Image
Time evolution of WR abundances Non- rotating star Time evolution of mass • Evolution of surface abundances (mass fraction) with stellar mass for 60M⊙ star (Meynet & Maeder, 2003) Rotating star Non-rotating Star Rotating Star 300 km/s at equator • Top curve—total mass; Bottom curve—convective core mass • 2D models—van Marle
Cosmic Ray Isotope Spectrometer (CRIS) • Large geometrical factor of CRIS (~50 x previous instruments) • Excellent mass resolution enables precise identification of abundances. • Statistical sample is large enough so that the energy spectra of the Neon isotopic ratios (important ratios as will be seen later) have been obtained
Source Abundances & Tracer Isotopes • To obtain source abundances from measured abundances, use “tracer” method (Wiedenbeck & Stone) • Use secondary isotopes to “subtract” the secondary component of isotopes that are predominantly primary
Two component models • Wolf-Rayet winds from stars with various initial masses, with and without rotation. • Adjust the WR fraction mixed with ISM to match CR 22Ne/20Ne. (Goriely, Arnould & Meynet Modeling) “Combined” data points (red) are mean values of ratios from Ulysses, Voyager, ISEE-3 and HEAO-3-C2
Fraction of WR material mixed with ISM with solar system composition to normalize to 22Ne/20Ne ratio 300 km/s But what about the 14N/16O and N/Ne ratios???
Volatility & mass fractionated GCR source abundances • Meyer et al., 1997 model—Refractory elements are enriched in GCRs since they sputter off accelerated dust grains • preferential acceleration (~factor of 13 enhancement) • Additionally, even for volatile elements, there appears to be a mass bias for which they estimate a mass dependency of A0.80.2 • Ratios need to be corrected for these effects. • Oxygen • Volatile in elemental or molecular form • But 23% is estimated to reside in refractory compounds in the ISM (e.g. silicates) (K. Lodders, 2003) • Nitrogen • Exists primarily as a gas in space • Carbon • Refractory in elemental form • But a poorly known fraction exists in volatile molecules (e.g. CO) in space. • Neon • Entirely volatile
GCR source abundances compared with WR model corrected for volatility and mass fractionation (open symbols)
Suggested Scenario • WR star ejecta, enriched in 22Ne and other neutron-rich isotopes, mixes within the superbubble (Higdon & Lingenfelter) with • Ejecta from core-collapse SN • Average ISM (represented by solar-system abundances) • Refractory elements must exist mostly as grains and volatile elements mostly as gas. • SN shocks accelerate mix of material in SB to cosmic ray energies • Grains are preferentially accelerated (Ellison et al.) • Mean time between SN events in SB is ~3-35 x 105 y (Schaller et al. 1992) • Sufficient time for 59Ni to decay to 59Co
Summary • CRIS measurements have led to an improved value 22Ne/20Ne, 58Fe/56Fe, and other isotope ratios useful for identifying a WR component in GCRs. • Comparison of CRIS and other data show • the three isotope ratios predicted to be most enhanced in WR models, 12C/16O, 22Ne/20Ne, and 58Fe/56Fe, are indeed enhanced in the cosmic rays. • Those for which enhancement is not predicted are consistent with solar system abundances, provided volatility and mass fractionation corrections are applied
Summary (cont) • We take agreement as evidence that WR star ejecta is likely an important component of cosmic-ray source material. • Since most WR stars & core-collapse SN reside in SBs, then SBs must be the predominant site of injection of WR material and SN ejecta into the GCR source material. • Picture that emerges is that SBs appear to be the site of origin and acceleration of at least a substantial fraction of GCRs.