180 likes | 308 Views
Work System 5. Enabling BPS with IT Support. IT Support Processes: Wave I. 5.1.1 Manage Technology Resources Delivery 5.1.2 Ensure Effective Utilization of Technology 5.1.3 Data Management. Effective Utilization: The Sum of Sub-Processes. 5.1.2 Ensure Effective Utilization of Technology
E N D
Work System 5 Enabling BPS with IT Support
IT Support Processes: Wave I • 5.1.1 Manage Technology Resources Delivery • 5.1.2 Ensure Effective Utilization of Technology • 5.1.3 Data Management
Effective Utilization: The Sum of Sub-Processes • 5.1.2 Ensure Effective Utilization of Technology • 5.1.2.1 Edline Implementation Process • 5.1.2.2 ETGP Process • 5.1.2.3 BETC Process • 5.1.2.4 EETT Process • 5.1.2.5 Recognition Process (ATTAIN) • 5.1.2.6 Technology Planning Process • 5.1.2.7 Sunrise Standard Training Process • 5.1.2.7.1 Videoconferencing Program • 5.1.2.7.2 Easiteach • 5.1.2.7.3 Discovery Streaming • Etc…
Define: Organizational Linkage • School Board Priority Objective (2007) • “Parents will have the ability to monitor student grades, homework and attendance via the Internet.” • Strategic Plan Objective (2011) • “Every teacher in every school will utilize Edline by the beginning of the 2010-2011 school year.”
Theme Statement The quality, quantity and consistency of professional development will continually improve causing the percent of teachers actively engaged in Edline to increase.
P1: # Teachers Trained P2: % Teachers Ready to Implement Q1: % Teachers Satisfied Q2: # Parents Satisfied Q3: % Teachers Utilizing Q4: # Parents Utilizing Ensure Effective Utilization of Edline Develop Training Deliver Training Effective? N Y Monitor Implementation Provide Ongoing Support N Evaluate (Surveys and Reports) Effective? Y Ensured Effective Utilization of Edline
Measure • Potential Problem Areas • Training does not meet the needs of teachers (P2) • Not all teachers are able to access training (P1) • Problem Statement • Last year, only 82% of 1526 teachers participating in Edline training felt as though they could successfully implement the program. As our target is 100%, there exists a significant opportunity for improvement--an 18% gap.
P2: Teachers Ready to Implement • 2007-2008 • 83% • 2008-2009 • 92% GAP
P1: Number Trained • 2007-2008 • 1526 Trained • 2008-2009 • 1295 Trained • Cumulative • 2821 Trained GAP
Analyze • Potential causes of selected problem from “Measure” step • Time • Support • Conflicting Interests
Control Work the Process!
Outcome Measures GAP
Outcome Measures GAP
Outcome Measures GAP
Next Steps • Promote Alternative Training Ops • Dig Deeper into FRL Gaps • 0-10% Free and Reduced: 93% (West Shore with 6% FRL) • 11-25% Free and Reduced: 84% (Jefferson with 24% FRL) • 26-50% Free and Reduced: 53% (Stone with 50% FRL) • 51-60% Free and Reduced: 44% (Coquina with 59% FRL) • 61-75% Free and Reduced: 22% (Palm Bay Elem. with 65% FRL) • 76-100% Free and Reduced: 5% (Cambridge with 86% FRL) • Develop Better Utilization Reports