90 likes | 232 Views
Judicial Review and RSLs. John Linwood DR&L Department Trowers & Hamlins LLP Date 22 January 2010. Judicial Review & RSLs. Why it matters What it is Weaver – before and after. Grounds for Challenge. Ultra Vires Errors of law Errors of fact Considerations Reasonableness
E N D
Judicial Review and RSLs John Linwood DR&L Department Trowers & Hamlins LLP Date 22 January 2010
Judicial Review & RSLs • Why it matters • What it is • Weaver – before and after
Grounds for Challenge • Ultra Vires • Errors of law • Errors of fact • Considerations • Reasonableness • Legitimate Expectation (substantive or procedural) • Natural justice • Consultation
Procedure • Pre-Action Protocol letter • 3 months limitation period • Application for permission • Acknowledgment of Service – 21 days (like defence) • Dismissal or directions • Hearing • Costs
Tenant Consultation • Reasons for • Adequate and proper • At formative stage • Sufficient information and reasoning • Adequate time • Proper consideration
Board Decisions – (1) Officers’ report to the Board • Facts • Legal advice • The big IF • Relevant considerations • Consistent application of policy • Procedure • Matter for decision
Board Decisions – (2) The Board • Clear divide with officers • No bias or partiality • Clear minutes, separate for legally privileged matters • The decision itself • Reasons
What RLSs need • Clear, well kept records • Clear, fair and relevant policies • Appropriate, documented procedures Audit trail to show: • Compliance with the above and law • Legitimate aim • Actions reasonable and proportionate
Summary • Courts do not want to stop/prevent pragmatic decisions made in the interests of tenants and the RSL. • Document • Facts/law considered • Procedure followed • Decision itself • Reasons for it