1 / 18

By: Sustainable Dry Feet Inc.

Case 3 Approaching Stakeholders to Invest in Urban Regeneration Projects: A fact-sheet construction for projects appraisal in WATERgraafsmeer. By: Sustainable Dry Feet Inc. Utrecht, 29 th October 2010. Index. Introduction Who we are? Project description Our Problem Understanding

zoie
Download Presentation

By: Sustainable Dry Feet Inc.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Case 3Approaching Stakeholders to Invest in Urban Regeneration Projects:A fact-sheet construction for projects appraisal in WATERgraafsmeer By:Sustainable Dry Feet Inc. Utrecht, 29th October 2010

  2. Index • Introduction • Who we are? • Project description • Our Problem Understanding • Multidisciplinary Approach • Results • Governance • Fact Sheet • Discussion

  3. Who we are? Dry Feet Inc. • Master Student Sustainable Development – EPM, Portuguese • Bachelors degree in Economics. Working experience as international financial auditor and assistant. David Castro • Master Student Sustainable Development – Business Management, Spanish • Four years business and supply chain management expertise. Previous Master in Chemical Engineering. Love traveling and knowing different cultures Laia Fayet • Master Student Sustainable Development – EPM, Dutch • BcS in environmental studies at the University of Utrecht, specialization in environmental policy and governance Marc Leijtens • Master Student Sustainable Development – EPM, Dutch • Bachelor in Psychology; worked in Burkina Faso on solar energy project. Broadly interested in all sustainability topics and especially the business aspects of sustainability. Sanderine van Odijk • Master Student Sustainable Development – LEB, Spanish • Bachelor in Biology. Loves climbing, playing the drums and listening to good music Imanol Oquiñena • Master Student Sustainable Development – EPM, Greek • Received a Bachelor's degree in Economics and Environmental Science and has four years of experience in asset management Jennifer Stamatelos • Master Student Sustainable Development – EPM, Dutch • Bachelors on economics, development studies, and political science. Leonardo Verkooijen

  4. Our Problem Understanding Governance • Network, Stakeholders Engagement OUR SCOPE Governance Project Identification Fact Sheet Construction Business Case Construction Project Implementation Fact Sheets • Structure, methodology, key indicators Sustainability - Triple Bottom Line Evaluation • Economic Impacts, Turnover, Investments • Environmental Impacts: Energy, Water, Materials, Waste, Biodiversity, Land use, Flood prevention, Temperature regulation • Social Impacts: Wellbeing, Quality of Life, Health, Education Policy • Policy, Regulations and Funding

  5. Multidisciplinary Proposal Approach Disciplinary Research Expected Results 1. Governance Stakeholder Analysis SO • Depiction stakeholder network Stakeholder Coalition ML • Stakeholder indicators JS 2. Policy, Regulation, Funding • Policy indicators Urban Regeneration Projects Fact Sheet Recipe Eenhoorn Case Study 3. Triple bottom line Evaluation 3.1 Economic Impacts LV • Economic indicators 3.2 Environmental Impacts • Environmental indicators Multiple scenario comparison Energy, Water, Waste, Emissions (household level) LF • Indicators IO Urban ecology • Indicators 3.3 Social Impacts DC • Social indicators

  6. Project Description

  7. Results - Stakeholder Analysis

  8. Results - Governance • Stakeholder characteristics: interest and power • Players (medium power): Waternet, Stadsdeel Oost en Projectbureau Wibaut a/d Amstel • Player (high power): Ymere • Subject: Klima Rain • Position (cooperation of) inhabitants yet unknown

  9. Power versus Interest grid

  10. Recommendations for the Client • Four courses of action • Cooperation; involving Ymere in the implementation of energy- and water systems in the Rudolf Dieselbuurt • Integration and lobbying; integration of small projects into one coherent program and lobbying towards Ymere to achieve joint implementation • Financial participation; involvement of the municipality of Amsterdam in (partial) financing the implementation costs • Support and project boosting; implementation of sustainable energy- and water systems on a large scale can be achieved by selecting pilot studies that will be supported and monitored by the municipality to accelerate the learning process.

  11. Results – Policy, regulations and funding

  12. POLICY SETTING

  13. lEGAL SETTING

  14. Results – Fact Sheet • End result – A practical, general fact sheet that Waternet can use for future cases. • Contains indicators for each relevant section. • Presents these across three scenarios.

  15. Discussion • Firstly, any questions? Clarifications? • Is this the most convincing way of presenting urban regeneration projects and engage stakeholders? • Suggestions?

  16. Thank you!

More Related