280 likes | 403 Views
Scaling up an Essential Harm Reduction Package: overcoming the barriers in South Asia. World Bank Inter-Country Consultation on Prevention of HIV among IDUs Scaling Up: From Evidence to Action 9–13 April, 2007, Kolkata, India Dr. Alex Wodak, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
E N D
Scaling up an Essential Harm Reduction Package: overcoming the barriers in South Asia World Bank Inter-Country Consultation on Prevention of HIV among IDUs Scaling Up: From Evidence to Action 9–13 April, 2007, Kolkata, India Dr. Alex Wodak, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia awodak@stvincents.com.au
Outline: • Recognising national HIV problem • Recognising need for harm reduction • Planning implementation • Ensuring sustainability
1 RecognisingHIV/IDUs problem: • Will, or is, HIV a problem in my country? • Will, or is, HIV/IDUs a problem in my country? • Power of national immunity myths • Power of denial • Can HIV/IDUs be controlled? • Pervasive nihilism about drugs • Nothing works, nothing effective or acceptable
Recognition HIV/IDUs problem: • Why bother trying to save IDUs? • ‘AIDS and drugs are problems that will solve each other’ • Does my country have to adopt harm reduction? • What is harm reduction? • Is harm reduction acceptable politically, legally? • Entrenched support drug law enforcement major obstacle to harm reduction
Overcoming barriers: 1 Assessment of risk: • Is HIV a problem in my country? • Is HIV/IDUs a problem in my country? • Isn’t my country immune? • Surveys HIV/IDUs: power of local data • Rapid assessment • Modelling health, social, economic impact • Comparing costs action vs. costs inaction • Reviews of international experience
Overcoming barriers: 2 2 Assessment of response: • Can HIV/IDUs be controlled? • Reviews of international experience • Harm reduction is effective, safe, cost-effective • Why bother trying to save IDUs? • Altruistic arguments • ‘It’s the right thing to do’ • Self-interest arguments • ‘What if it was your own son/daughter?’ • ‘You will go down in history’ • ‘You might not like them but the general population will suffer’
Overcoming barriers: 3 • Does my country have to adopt harm reduction? • Review of options • What is harm reduction? • Explaining harm reduction • Primary focus on harm • Includes promotion abstinence • Use of same approach in other policies
Overcoming barriers: 4 • Is harm reduction acceptable politically, legally? • Documentation support in UN system • WHO, UNAIDS, UNODC • Acceptance by other countries • Legal status UNODC report • Relationship to drug law reform? • Indulgence? • Essential?
Overcoming barriers: 5 • Critical importance political leadership • HIV control only achieved where strong leadership e.g. Thailand, Uganda, Australia • What’s popular doesn’t work • What works, isn’t popular • Need highest level leadership • Raise, maintain high level awareness • Belief efficacy, safety of prevention • Mobilise funding
2 Accepting harm reduction: • Is harm reduction accepted nationally? • Will harm reduction be implemented by all government departments? • Is harm reduction morally acceptable?
Overcoming barriers: • Is harm reduction accepted nationally? • Arranging demonstration of national acceptance • Will harm reduction be implemented by all government departments? • Developing partnerships: • Religious leaders • Government officials • Law enforcement • Guidelines, training, international collaboration • Injecting drug users • Researchers, clinicians
Overcoming barriers: 2 • Is harm reduction morally acceptable? • Contrast with morality condemning unborn generations HIV despite known effective prevention
3 Planning implementation: • How many IDUs are there? • What kinds of interventions needed? • How much each intervention is needed? • Goals and targets? • Should prisons be included? • Vulnerable and bridge populations? • Should ‘pre-IDUs’ be included?
Planning implementation: 2 • How many, what kind staff needed? • Buildings? • Materials procured? • Vehicles, computers? • Training? • Administration? • Funding? • Research?
Overcoming barriers: • How many IDUs are there? • Capture-recapture • Multiplier • Triangulation • Back calculation, modelling • What kinds of interventions needed? • Reviews international experience • Education, NSPs, drug treatment, community development • Manuals
Overcoming barriers: 2 • How much each intervention is needed? • UNAIDS guidelines • Modelling • Current reviews • Goals and targets? • History + x%? • 5 year plan?
Overcoming barriers: 3 • Should prisons be included? • Community first, then prisons? • Important but too difficult? • Vulnerable and bridge populations • Ethnic minorities • Severely disadvantaged groups • MSM IDUs • CSW IDUs • Certain drugs e.g. amphetamine, cocaine
Overcoming barriers: 4 • Should ‘pre-IDUs’ be included? • High risk youth • Non injecting drug users • How many, what kind staff? • Doctors • Other healthcare • Administration • Researchers
Overcoming barriers: 5 • Buildings? • Needle syringe programme outlets • Drop In Centres • Drug treatment clinics • Materials? • Methadone, buprenorphine • Needles, syringes • Environmental policies
Overcoming barriers: 6 • Vehicles, computers? • Coordination • Generating, compiling data • Training? • Manuals • Train the trainer • National centre?
Overcoming barriers: 7 • Administration? • Central control? • Devolve states/provinces? • National guidelines? • Funding? • Are national resources available? • If not now, when? • Can GFATM resources secured? • Other • Multilateral • Bilateral
Overcoming barriers: 8 • Research? • Hasn’t there been enough research? • Local data much more powerful • Local researchers • Understand language, culture, history • Always there, critical advocacy role • How to train? • Help defend sensitive programmes
4 Ensuring sustainability: • How monitor, evaluate? • Defending ‘controversial programmes for unpopular populations’
Overcoming barriers: • How monitor, evaluate? • Simple • Timely • Inexpensive • Un-intrusive • Meaningful • Benefits of small, frequent vs. large, infrequent
Overcoming barriers: • Defending controversial programmes for unpopular populations • Strategic, creative, national • Monitor opposition carefully • Commission research • Attend promptly to problems of prevention
Conclusions: • Raise, maintain high level awareness of HIV • Promote effectiveness, safety, cost effectiveness of harm reduction • Explain, maintain advocacy harm reduction • Importance high level political leadership
Conclusions: 2 • Entrenched support drug law enforcement major obstacle to harm reduction • Counter moral arguments against harm reduction by appeal to protection unborn generations • Develop structures encourage partnerships
Conclusions: 3 • Plan strategy implementation • Which strategies? • How much? • Goals, targets? • Estimate staff, materials, support, training, funding • Ensuring sustainability • Monitoring, evaluation • Supporting valuable, vulnerable programs