1 / 19

Higher Education Revenue Sources

Higher Education Revenue Sources. UM System Revenue Sources. Source: University of Missouri System (2013) Fiscal year 2013 Operating Budget https://uminfopoint.umsystem.edu/media/fa/budget/operating/FY2013BudgetBook.pdf. University of Missouri - “Enterprise” Operations.

zoltin
Download Presentation

Higher Education Revenue Sources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Higher Education Revenue Sources

  2. UM System Revenue Sources Source: University of Missouri System (2013) Fiscal year 2013 Operating Budget https://uminfopoint.umsystem.edu/media/fa/budget/operating/FY2013BudgetBook.pdf

  3. University of Missouri - “Enterprise” Operations Source: http://budget.missouri.edu/2011_MU_Budget_Snapshot.pptx

  4. Washington University - STL Source: Washington University Annual Report 2007-2008 - http://annualreport.wustl.edu/financial.html

  5. St. Louis Community College Source: Financial Statements, June 30 2008, and 2007, Junior College District of St. Louis - http://www.stlcc.edu/Document_Library/STLCC_FS_2008.pdf

  6. Community College Funding • 26 State’s CCs Receive local funding • Amount varies quite substantially • High of 55% in Arizona • Missouri – 26% • Trends is lower support from local tax bases • Property Tax Revolts in at least 7 states • Ability of small communities to support increasing costs of higher education

  7. Community College Funding • Every state’s CCs receive some state funding • 29 use a Funding Formula, including MO • 15 don’t • 6 were not included in survey • High of 71% in Arkansas and Connecticut • Low of 14% in Vermont (83% from tuition) • MO – 41%

  8. Desrochers, D. M., Lenihan, C. M., & Wellman, J. V. (2010).  Trends in college spending: 1998-2008. Washington, DC: Delta Cost Project on Postsecondary Education Costs, Productivity, and Accountability

  9. Group Activity • Recent history has indicated that public institutions are relying less on their states and more on alternative revenue sources to support their operations. Develop a theoretical explanation for why this is occurring. • Develop a logic map which details what your group considers the primary explanation for this trend. • What theoretical perspectives drive your map? • What empirical evidence supports your map?

  10. 5 Narratives for Tuition Inflation • The states made prices rise • Since 1990, the University of Missouri revenues (general operating) have dropped from 70% to 37% state supported. • Tuition and Fees (gross) is now the largest revenue source in the budget. (As of 2004) Source: Mumper, M. (2001). The paradox of college prices: Five stories with no clear lesson. In D. E. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  11. Operations Fund Revenue State Appropriations vs. Tuition Does not include Hospital or Extension Source: http://mubudget.missouri.edu/2009-mu-budget-snapshot.ppt

  12. 5 Narratives for Tuition Inflation 2. Medicaid and Prisons Made Prices Rise • Higher education is the largest discretionary item in a states budget • During recessions something has to be cut • K-12, Medicaid, and prisons are guaranteed items • 1986-1996 state budgetary changes: • Medicaid 96% • Corrections 26.7% • Higher Education -13.8% • K-12 Education -4.8% Source: Mumper, M. (2001). The paradox of college prices: Five stories with no clear lesson. In D. E. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  13. 5 Narratives for Tuition Inflation • Quality Programs Cost Money • “We could let tuition increase or we could cut back on quality” – New York General Assembly member • Cost of providing a high quality education is increasing • Technology • Old buildings Source: Mumper, M. (2001). The paradox of college prices: Five stories with no clear lesson. In D. E. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  14. 5 Narratives for Tuition Inflation • Quality Programs Cost Money • Higher Education Price Index (HEPI) • Estimated by the Commonfund Institute • Inflation index for institutions of higher education • Fixed market basket of goods purchased by institutions of higher education • Faculty Salaries, Admin. Salaries, Clerical, Service Employees, Fringe Benefits, Misc. Services, Supplies and materials, Utilities

  15. HEPI vs. CPI

  16. HEPI vs. Public Tuition Costs

  17. 5 Narratives for Tuition Inflation 4. Unaccountable Public Colleges • Colleges are increasing put under pressure to act more like a business • Cut inefficient positions • Calls for accountability at state and Federal levels Source: Mumper, M. (2001). The paradox of college prices: Five stories with no clear lesson. In D. E. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  18. 5 Narratives for Tuition Inflation 5. It only looks like a problem • Despite the increases in costs more students are attending, thus, college must still be a good investment. • Increases in demand have allowed more enrollment despite high prices. Source: Mumper, M. (2001). The paradox of college prices: Five stories with no clear lesson. In D. E. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  19. Discussion • Given what we have discussed, are there any changes you would make to your logic map? • What were some things you had not considered? • How important is the state context in state funding 0f higher education? • What do you think are some potential consequences, long- and short-term, that can result from the funding trends in either state?

More Related