160 likes | 532 Views
Gender Discrimination College Graduates’ Labor Market. Presenter: Ge Yuhao. Structure. Motivation; Literature; Experiment Design; Empirical Results; Conclusions;. Motivation. Three kinds of gender discrimination: Employment opportunity; Wage or salary;
E N D
Gender Discrimination College Graduates’ Labor Market Presenter: Ge Yuhao
Structure • Motivation; • Literature; • Experiment Design; • Empirical Results; • Conclusions;
Motivation • Three kinds of gender discrimination: • Employment opportunity; • Wage or salary; • Industry (or occupation) distribution; • This paper focuses on employment opportunity in the labor market of college graduates. • Much attention in news papers and TV programs. • Few empirical research from scholars.
Literature • Gustafsson & Li (2000). Discrimination accounts for 52.49% in the raw gender wage gap in 1988, and rises to 63.20% in 1995. • Kuhn and Shen (2013). Explicit gender discrimination is much more often on positions requiring low levels of skill. • Bertrand and Mullainathan(2004). Fake resumes by managing names.
Experiment Design • Construct the resume template (Please see the attachment). • Choose the experiment sample and implement the training. • Every participant is asked to make a resume according to his\her true information, but the name is an exception. • Every participant is asked to make a fake resume by changing gender, height and weight.
Experiment Design • The participants put these two resumes on the job websites. • Set the deadline to collect the information of the number of the offer. • At last, 95 participants, 190 observations. • Suggestions are welcomed.
Discrimination Coefficient • Discrimination Coefficient: • Y: the number of the offer.
Total sample • On average, male applicants get 40% higher offers than female. • High degree of discrimination.
By different subsamples • Almost all the difference is positive and significant. Discrimination again by sample! • Party member. party_no <party_yes • Edu_level. Undergraduate<graduate • GPA. GPA_bad<GPA_normal<GPA_good • English. EN_bad<EN_normal<EN_good
What is the wrong with the world? • Female applicants face more serious discrimination when they seems more successful. • Why?
Possible Explanation • Statistical discrimination theory; • The employers assume the relation of true productivity (TP) and observable human capital score (S, such as edu_level, GPA, english) is that: • is the mean of for the group where the applicant belong to.
Possible Explanation • The employers assume: • Then:
Possible Explanation • The employer still want to recruit the applicants with high productivity. • Female applicants are discriminated because there is information asymmetry and they can not persuade the employers that they have high productivity.
Practice • Back to Table 2. • practice_no> practice_yes; • Practice serves as a signal to solve the problem of information asymmetry; • Practice could alleviate the negative effect of discrimination for female college graduates.
Conclusions • First, there is serious discrimination against female applicants in labor market of college graduates, and the degree of discrimination rises as applicants’ human capital level increase. • Second, practice could alleviate the negative effect of discrimination. • Third, the reason of discrimination in labor market of college graduates may be the information asymmetry.