1 / 4

BPS Two-Tier Curtailment Sub Team Sep 23, 2011 Conference Call

BPS Two-Tier Curtailment Sub Team Sep 23, 2011 Conference Call. Sub team members- Chris Advena , Art Wolfe, Mike ColbyPJM Nelson Muller, OATI Steve Sanders, WAPA John Harmon, MISO Ed Skiba , MISO Narinder Saini , Ed Davis, Entergy Bert Bressers , SPP James Manning, NCEMCS

zorina
Download Presentation

BPS Two-Tier Curtailment Sub Team Sep 23, 2011 Conference Call

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BPS Two-Tier Curtailment Sub TeamSep 23, 2011 Conference Call • Sub team members- • Chris Advena, Art Wolfe, Mike ColbyPJM • Nelson Muller, OATI • Steve Sanders, WAPA • John Harmon, MISO • Ed Skiba, MISO • NarinderSaini, Ed Davis, Entergy • Bert Bressers, SPP • James Manning, NCEMCS • Shah Hossain, Westar

  2. Discussion Items (no particular priority order) • Decide on remaining scope of work 1)Finalize paper (developed under Chris Advena’s leadership): Guidance document from BPS to Subteam dated August 9, 2011. • Action Item 54 - Develop draft language for First-to-Curtail Requirements business rules, Review and update Scenarios if needed, provide brief description explaining why the language is changing • Translate the guidance document weqbps080911a17.docx in to business requirements in the PFV Whitepaper [ED SKIBA] • Cross check the guidance document with the Chris Advena whitepaper weqbps080911w10.docx to assure that the issues raised in the whitepaper are addressed in the guidance document. Make decisions if necessary on items not addressed in the guidance document • Parking Lot item # 24 – does the guidance document address this issue? If not, sub team needs to consider making a decision [JOHN HARMON] • Business rules around the requirement for IDC to provide transparency matrix for First to Curtail/Last to Curtail (to become a NERC requirement). Business practice would be so that TSP would have to upload to IDC tool to which that TSP has coordination agreement and/or reciprocity agreements with other TSPs; other TSPs would also verify this information (A BPS requirement). IDCWG to develop IDC Change Order consistent with BPS Final Solution requirements. Need enough details. [STEVE SANDERS] Addresses James Manning issue to sub team • Reliability concerns around First to Curtail/Last to Curtail. See weq_bps080911w11.docx Subteam to review concern, decide whether concern can be addressed within sub team and if not, elevate to BPS. Also review any other concerns. (careful to balance against time constraints) • Verify definition of “First to Curtail” is consistent with PFV Whitepaper

  3. Discussion Items (no particular priority order) • Decide on remaining scope of work 2) Parking Lot item # 19 - Granularity of Transmission Service Reservations, as studied/granted under each TSP’s OATT, in Permanent Solution [BERT BRESSERS] 1 & 2) Verify granularity issues mentioned in Parking Lot # 19 and # 24 – whether these are discreet or related issued – subject to discussion and clarification . Bert – these two ARE NOT related !!!

  4. Next conference calls • Friday, Sep 30, 3-5 Eastern • Friday, Oct 7, 3-5 Eastern • Friday, Oct 14, 3-5 Eastern [to be confirmed in our Sep 30 conference call]

More Related