500 likes | 910 Views
Daimler Chrysler. Saidi Isaac Ron Sparks Candace Stocker Jeron Wright. Daimler Chrysler’s Position. Daimler Chrysler is committed to achieve consumer satisfaction among all global auto manufacturers because of our engineering excellence, innovative products, and superior service.
E N D
Daimler Chrysler Saidi Isaac Ron Sparks Candace Stocker Jeron Wright
Daimler Chrysler’s Position • Daimler Chrysler is committed to achieve consumer satisfaction among all global auto manufacturers because of our engineering excellence, innovative products, and superior service.
External Analysis • Economic Factors • Social Factors • Political Factors • Technological Factors • Ecological Factors
Competitor Profiles Toyota
Competitor Profiles GM Ford
Value-Chain Analysis • Primary activities • Secondary activities • Strength and Weakness • Competitive advantage
Primary activities Inbound Logistics Marketing and Sales Service marketing communications
Secondary Activities Human Resources Management Technology Development Firm Infrastructure
Strengths And Weakness Strong Brand names Broaden it with models Perfect fit and leaders Negative view of Mercedes
Competitive Advantages Wide variety of vehicles Mercedes’ strong characteristics
Core Issue • Automakers had been losing money. • After 9/11/2001 sales of cars and trucks dropped dramatically • Mitsubishi’s sales were 20% • Chrysler’s sales were 5% • Mercedes’ sales were 2% 2003
Core Issue (cont.) • How to differentiate themselves from global competition in a meaningful, sustainable manner. • Growth of China automobile market • Developing innovative vehicles that appeal to consumers • How to remain profitable in the future
SWOT Summary • S: • W: • O: • T:
Employment • In 1998, the average annual number of employees totaled 433,939 • Peaked in 2000 at 463,561 • By 2002, the average dropped to a mere 370,677 • From 1998 to 2000, 92,884 people lost their jobs • This equates to 25% of DaimlerChrysler employee force
Net Income • From 1998 to 2003 DaimlerChrysler only experienced a loss in net income within 2001 • In 2000 the company had nearly a gain of 7.89 billion • In 2001 this amount totaled a whopping negative 662 million • Causes and effects
Stock Prices • Trends • Factors • Economic conditions
Market Conditions • Terrorist attacks • Capital funding • Acquisitions within the industry
LONG TERM OBJECTIVE • Number one automobile manufacturer in the world
BEST CASE SCENARIO • Not to separate Operation Groups: • Mercedes units • Chrysler units • Mitsubishi units
WORST CASE SCENARIO • Separation of the groups • Sale of Chrysler units • loosen a mega-merger • Money for Promotional
MOST LIKELY SCENARIO • Separation of operations units • Mercedes unit from • Chrysler unit and • Mitsubishi unit
WHY • Maintain Mercedes position • Profit for Innovation • Costly to maintain and sustain other • Have stronger brand image • Succeed and Survive in the competitive markets
Alternative I: Reorganization • Expected Benefits • Winning Against the Competition • Drawbacks
Expected Benefits • Units work cross-divisionally to maximize strengths • Allows for the transfer of information, innovation, and expertise • Cost-saving strategies • Feasibility
Winning Against the Competition • Variety • Increased attractiveness • Stronger vehicle designs • Extra kickers
Drawbacks • Negative view towards Mercedes • Decrease in sales for Mercedes • A way around these implications
Alternative II: Restructuring • Expected Benefits • Pros • Cons
Expected Benefits • Fixes Mercedes quality issue • Increases the Mercedes brand image • Helps DaimlerChrysler
Pros • Power of Mercedes • Generated profits • A focus to improve
Cons • Relying to much on Mercedes • Holding up both ends • Mercedes could still have quality issues • How to reduce these
SBUs • Mercedes Car Group • Chrysler Group • Commercial Vehicles • Services (DaimlerChrysler Bank) • Other Activities (MTU Aero Engines, Mitsubishi Motors, European Aeronautic Defense and Space Company (EADS)
Generic Strategies • Differentiation • Low-Cost
Evaluation of Business Level Strategies Differentiation Pros Cons Companies imitate Consumers view changes Difficult to charge premiums • High level of customer loyalty • Charge premium for product • Possible increase in revenue • Reach wider target market
Evaluation of Business Level StrategiesLower Cost Leader Pros Cons Companies imitate Technology changes Bases for cost leadership erode • Lower prices • Higher profit margin • Increase in revenue
Grand Strategies • Product Development • Market Development • Innovation
Preferred Strategic Choice • Long-term Objective • Corporate Level Strategy • Business Level Strategy