320 likes | 421 Views
Production of Ice in Tropospheric Clouds by Will Cantrell and Andrew Heymsfield. Presentation by: Emily Riley 27 February 2007. Outline:. Homogeneous Nucleation Theory Assumptions Heterogeneous Nucleation Different Types of Particles Preactivation Contact Nucleation
E N D
Production of Ice in Tropospheric Cloudsby Will Cantrell and Andrew Heymsfield Presentation by: Emily Riley 27 February 2007
Outline: • Homogeneous Nucleation • Theory • Assumptions • Heterogeneous Nucleation • Different Types of Particles • Preactivation • Contact Nucleation • Secondary Production • Hallett-Mossop process • Other Mechanisms
Homogeneous Nucleation Theory Nucleation Occurs: energy contribution from bulk > energy contribution surface • Jo - long explanation • E - energy barrier • f(, , c, LH, ) • f(T) • k - Boltzmann’s constant Nucleation Rate: J = Joexp(-E/kT)
Homogeneous Nucleation Theory • Assumes: (1) Water molecules randomly arrange into an ice structure (2) Liquid transitions directly to hexagonal ice crystal (3) occurs in pure water (4)The initial ice fragment forms in the bulk
Problem: Nucleation rate disagreed with observations So, Are Assumptions Good?
Assumption (1): • As T decreases, J increases more than the theory predicts! Why? • As T decreases, the nature of Hydrogen bonding results in water clustering • The clusters grow with decreasing T, while the bond links become more linear Pruppacher (1995)
Assumption (2) • There can be an intermediate step from liquid to hexagonal crystals • Cubic crystals • occur T < -70C • Can cause clouds to dehydrate more effectively in the upper trop. Riikonen et al. (2000)
Assumption (3) • Homogeneous nucleation can occur in solution drops • Solute becomes dissolved in water such that the drop is like pure water • Use a modified temperature - T* = T + T • T - melting pt. depression • - Fudge factor that relates fz pt. depression to T
Assumption (3) • Koop et al. (2000) • J in an aqueous solution is independent of the nature of the solute, only depends on water activity • Good or bad…Don’t know?? • Seifert et al. (2003a) & Cziczo et al. (2004) • While independent of solute nature, may depend on solute size
Assumption (4) • Djikaev et al. (2002) • Nucleation could be favored at the surface as opposed to the “bulk” • Only important for D < 1m
Heterogeneous Nucleation: • Basics • Particle and Surface Characteristic Studies • Preactivation • Two Studies • Contact Nucleation • One Study
Heterogeneous Nucleation: • May significantly impact radiative properties of clouds • J equation still holds, but nowE is decreaseddue to substrate • Common substrates - dust, fly ash, soot • Interesting substrates - long-chain alcohols, testosterone
Let’s look at some studies... The importance of dust: • Zuberi et al (2002) • Found ammonium sulfate drops with dust (kalonite & montmorillonite) immersed in them had freezing temperatures 10C higher than drops without dust • Hung et al. (2003) • Found ammonium sulfate drops with aerosols (corundum & hematite) raised the freezing temperature 6C
Let’s look at some studies... The importance of the surface character: • DeMott et al. (1999) • Coated soot particles with sulfuric acid • For T > -53C untreated, monolayered, and multi-layered soot particles initiated ice formation about the same • For T < -53C multi-layered soot particles formed ice better
Let’s look at some studies... The importance of the surface character: • Gorbunov et al. (2001) • If the surface contains chemical groups capable of forming hydrogen bonds with water molecules, the soot’s ice-forming potential could be increased. • Such surfaces were 3x more efficient as ice nuclei at -20C than surfaces without such capabilities
Preactivation : “memory effect” • Increase in the effective freezing T after ice nucleator has catalyzed the phase transition once or cooled below -40C • Effect lost if T (of the system) exceeds some threshold • Occurs due to an ordered, ice like layer of water molecules on the substrate • Basically, aged nucleators more efficient
Yet more studies... Preactivation : “memory effect” • Seeley and Seidler. (2001) • Long chain alcohols exhibit preactivation • Alcohols could act as effective ice nucleators above the melting point
Yet more studies... Preactivation : “memory effect” continuted: • Rosinski (1991) & Rosinski and Morgan (1991) • Conditioned Particles 1. Particles exposed to SS H2O(v) at T < 0C 2. Resulting drops evaporated 3. Particles exposed to H2O(v) SS w.r.t. ice but not H2O(l) • Result: conditioned particles formed ice crystals by deposition, while non-conditioned particles did not
Contact Nucleation: • Freezing of a drop initiated by contact with an aerosol particle • Substance have a different freezing threshold than when they act as deopostion, condensation, or immersion nuclei • Indicates freezing mechanism different for different modes
Secondary Production: • Important - Ice production frequently exceeds IN concentration • How: • Hallet-Mossop process (most common) • Mechanical Fracture • Ice multiplication
Hallett and Mossop (1974), Mossop and Hallett (1974),Mossop (1976)
Studies confirming the Hallett-Mossop process... • Hogen et al. (2002) • Observed ice crystal concentrations up to 1000 l-1 in UK convection at T = -6C • Typical heterogeneous IN concentrations were 3-5 orders of magnitude lower than the measured IN concentrations • Ovtchinnikov et al. (2000) • Cumulus clouds in NM • Modeling studies - confirmed these observations
So, is it always the H-M process? • According to Hobbs and Rangno (many papers), Nope. Why not? • Clouds glacieated much faster than H-M process could explain • Crystal habits observed were often not compatible with the T range in which H-M operates • High concentrations of small ice particles appeared concurrently with frozen drizzle drops • Conclusion - Origin of ice is a mystery…sounds like a job for more research!
Other Mechanisms: • Mechanical Fracture • Occurs particularly in dendritic crystals • Ice multiplication • Occurs when large drops shatter upon freezing
Conclusion: • Homogeneous Nucleation - Best Understood • Secondary Production - Somewhat Understood • Heterogeneous Production - “Progress is desperately needed”