1 / 10

How do these view differ on flag burning?

How do these view differ on flag burning?. Should Burning the American Flag be Legal?. What reasonable consequences might one face for their expression. Freedom of Expression. Types of Expression: Pure speech: spoken word, verbal expression Symbolic speech: expressive action

zuri
Download Presentation

How do these view differ on flag burning?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How do these view differ on flag burning?

  2. Should Burning the American Flag be Legal?

  3. What reasonable consequences might one face for their expression

  4. Freedom of Expression • Types of Expression: • Pure speech: spoken word, verbal expression • Symbolic speech: expressive action • Seditious Speech: challenges authority • Defamatory speech: false speech • Slander: spoken • Libel: written • Obscenity: offensive speech • Commercial Speech • Political Speech

  5. Landmark Cases

  6. Is it reasonable to expect privacy on social networking sites?

  7. Should allowing access to your Facebook account be a condition of employment?

  8. Right to Privacy? • Constitutional Right? • Not Enumerated: • 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 9th Amendment • Griswold and Roe • Katz • 4th protects people not places • Dissent: 4th refers to tangible items

  9. Cases • Olmstead v. US (1929) • Eavesdropping in public area • Katz v. U.S. (1967) • Expectation of privacy in public (people not places) • Griswold v. Conn. (1965) • Use of contraception (consenting adults in the home) • Roe v. Wade (1973) • Right to abortion protected • Ouinlan (1976) & Cruzan (1990) cases • Right to refuse treatment, must have “clear and convincing evidence” it was their wish • Washington v. Glucksburg (1997) • No right to suicide • Lawrence v. Texas (2003) • Sodomy laws unconstitutional (consenting adults in the home) • Gonzales v. Oregon (2006) • Legality of physician assisted suicide left to states

More Related