1 / 13

Svetoslav Cholakov Plamena Andreeva Neno Hristov , Dr.

Svetoslav Cholakov Plamena Andreeva Neno Hristov , Dr. Application of the Architectural Approach as a Tool for Effective National Crises Response System Build-up. Contents. Introduction Use of AA NCRS Requirements Capabilities NATO experience Architectural model of NCRS

zuri
Download Presentation

Svetoslav Cholakov Plamena Andreeva Neno Hristov , Dr.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SvetoslavCholakov Plamena Andreeva NenoHristov, Dr. Application of the Architectural Approach as a Tool for Effective National Crises Response System Build-up

  2. Contents • Introduction • Use of AA • NCRS Requirements • Capabilities • NATO experience • Architectural model of NCRS • Architecture management • Example of a model of SAR subsystem • LL & Recommendations

  3. Why AA? • Overarching • Scientific and realistic • Universal • Applicable • Proved in practice • Highly effective • Gives complex solutions • Has no alternatives

  4. Principles • Timely decision making and timely post event measures • Deep preliminary preparation and availability of clear procedures • Well established and prepared working organisation in advance using current admin structures • Territorial distribution and coverage • Net-centric C3 capabilities • Personal responsibility • Complex support • Continuous control till effective crisis overcome • Concentration and availability in real time of high quality expertise in all functional areas • Transparency and high quality information environment for everybody

  5. Capabilities • SAR • Evacuation • Firefighting • Earthquake consequences overcome • Industrial incidences consequences overcome • Forecasting and early warning, fight against floods • Transport and communication incidences overcome • NBC protection • Medical support

  6. Capabilities • Pandemic protection and counteracting bio threats • Refugees control • Crowd control • Overcome of consequences from cyber attacks, nets related threats and countering info and psy ops against the state

  7. Capabilities • Analysis and early warning related to energy security • Maintenance of high readiness of the subsystem for warning, analysis and forecasting, subsystem for gathering, analysis and application in practice of positive national and international experience in crises management

  8. AA Support SW

  9. Use ofMEGAin SAR Application

  10. Lessons Learned • SAR capabilities are insufficient and have low effectiveness • Lack of modern SAR equipment • Lack of national SAR standards • The specialized SAR equipment of both military and civil vessels are out of date • Lack of effective coordination procedures at inter ministerial and national level • The training and preparation of special SAR staff is insufficient

  11. Recommendations • Policy making for NCRSusing AA • Capabilities analysis • Legislature review • Decision making at top level on NCRS • Identification of executive structure responsible for CM • National readiness and preparation check-upincluding Bulgarian Armed Forces

  12. OVERARCHING PEOPLE PROCESSES INFO ARCHITECTURE GOAL SYSTEMS National Crisis Response System

  13. Questions please ?

More Related