1 / 25

L 1

L 1. The Key to ICAO: First Experiences with a New Language Proficiency Examination for Military Air Traffic Controllers and its Implications Dr. Dugald Sturges , Federal Office of Languages Hürth, Germany Dr. Christopher Hüllen, Federal Ministry of Defence Bonn, Germany

zurina
Download Presentation

L 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. L 1 The Key to ICAO: First Experiences with a New Language Proficiency Examination for Military Air Traffic Controllers and its Implications Dr. DugaldSturges, Federal Office ofLanguages Hürth, Germany Dr. Christopher Hüllen, Federal MinistryofDefence Bonn, Germany BILC Conference, Vilnius, May 2011

  2. “Tower, I think you misunderstood our request…“

  3. The New ICAO Language Requirements L 3 1997 - ICAO Air Navigation Commission (ANC) reviews the existing provisions for air-ground and ground-ground voice communication in international civil aviation 2003 - The Council of ICAO adopts language Standards and Recommended Practices recommended by the Proficiency Requirements in Common English Study Group (PRICE SG) for pilots, controllers, air traffic service providers and airlines. 2008 - These provisions become applicable. March 2011 - Deadline for ICAO member states to ensure that aviation personnel achieve ICAO Level 4 (Operational) proficiency in English.

  4. “Project ICAO Test” L 4 The Tasking: October 2009: The German Air Force Office of Flight Safety (AFSBw) commissions the Federal Office of Languages with the development of regular testing procedures for military Air Traffic Controllers in accordance with ICAO Level 4. 1st Half 2010 – All ATC personnel given assessment tests. 2010 - Development ofnewtesting material in Listening Comprehensionand Oral Proficiencyin accordance with ICAO Standard with cooperation of the AFSBw. January 2011 - Testing in accordance with ICAO Level 4begins.

  5. “Project ICAO Test” L 5 Test Development: Development Team at the Air Force Officer School in Fürstenfeldbrück, with assistance from the Bundessprachenamt (BSprA) in Hürth. • Test Item Approbation: • At the Air Force Officer School in Fürstenfeldbrück (GAF • officer candidates) • At the BSprA, Hürth (Federal Police flight school • candidates)

  6. “Project ICAO Test” L 6 • Train the Trainer: • 8th to 10th December 2010 at the Air Force Officer School, • Fürstenfeldbrück. • English instructors and testers from the • Bundessprachenamt in Fürstenfeldbrück, Hürth, and • Army Aviation School, Bückeburg. • Goal: to introduce trainers to the testing material and • procedure, in particular the similarities and differences to • testing and evaluating English language proficiency • according to STANAG 6001.

  7. “Project ICAO Test” L 7 • Train the Trainer: • Topics included: • The Framework for Aviation English Testing • Test Purpose and Test Types • Fundamental Principles of Testing • Test Formats (Listening, Oral) • Test Assessment • The Role of the Examiner • Practical Application in Mock Testing Situations

  8. “Project ICAO Test” L 8 • Test Delivery: • Teams of examiners at Fürstenfeldbrück, Hürth, and • Bückeburg. • Examinations delivered regionally • At BSprA schools (Fürstenfeldbrück/ South, Hürth/West, • Bückeburg/ North & East) • Where number of examinees warrant - on location Test Population: Approximately 300 Military Air Traffic Controllers • First Round of Testing: • January – June 2011 • By end of June 2011 ca. 160 ATCs will have been tested • Second round to begin in September 2011

  9. Listening Comprehension Test 15 audio items 1 Multiple Choice question per item Each audio item is heard twice (once for Level 5) 11 items (70%) required for pass L 9

  10. Oral Test Duration: ca. 12 Minutes Four Parts Part 1: Warm-up, personal introduction. (approx. 2 minutes) Part 2: Control-related information. Description of job and experience(s). (approx. 2 minutes) Part 3: Routine and Non-Routine Situations. Back-to back photo description (aviation situation). (approx. 4 minutes) Part 4: Discussion. Aviation safety topics. (approx. 4 minutes) Testing Team of 2: 1 Examiner, one Evaluator (with Evaluation Sheet) L 10

  11. Comparison / Contrast: “ICAO Test” versus SLP testing L 11 • Listening Comprehension Exam • Non-native and “difficult native” speakers • Listening items heard twice each • “One out of three” MC questions • Primarily aviation-related items (limited topic areas) • Monolingual • Oral Exam • Use of scripted oral examination questions • Restrictions on examiner feedback • Picture description task • No preparation • Exclusively aviation and professionally-related items • Monolingual

  12. ICAO Level 4 = “SLP Level 2+ PLUS” Examinees with a “good” STANAG Level 2 GENERAL language competency passed according to the ICAO Level 4 descriptors However, knowledge of specialist aviation terminology and usage is essential to successfully deal with oral proficiency exam. L 12 • Therefore, experienced ATCs with weaker GENERAL language competency could compensate with job experience, whereas younger, inexperienced ATCs-in-training, who often were more fluent in GENERAL English were more challenged.

  13. SLP level 2 requires ability to deal with ROUTINE situations, while ICAO level 4 aims at mastering the UNEXPECTED. Reason: Most of the time, ATCs can get by with a limited corpus of standardized terminology. ICAO certification aims at ensuring that aviators master the rare but critical situations when the unexpected occurs. L 13 • Therefore: Students are confronted with non-native or “difficult“ native speakers in listening items • The experienced ATC who has literally “heard it all before“ may have an advantage over the novice who is challenged by non-standard responses.

  14. The “Key?” L 14 Or: Can SLP testing replace ICAO Certification for Military Aviators?

  15. L 15 Consequence: for newly trained personnel, a combination of a Level 3 SLP and the US Qualification Course are mandatory. Examinees with valid level 3 certification according NATO STANAG 6001 have all passed the ICAO level 4 exam – albeit those with professional aviation experience had a considerable edge.

  16. Of the first 82 Candidates tested, 3 failed the Listening Comprehension Test, while all 82 passed the Oral exam. All three cases involved OLDER (40+) ATCs WITHOUT recent SLPs or language training. L 16 Reason: the tendency especially of personnel with long years of service to settle into a routine “Tower speak“, which restricts the ability to communicate in unexpected situations. Consequence: for personnel already in service, RECURRENT certification of ATCs according to ICAO level 4 has been implemented and will be maintained as a quality management measure.

  17. L 17 • Is testing military Air Traffic controllers according to ICAO proficiency levels legally necessary? • THAT is the question to be addressed in the second part of this talk… Does testing military Air Traffic controllers according to ICAO proficiency levels make sense as a means of maintaining and improving quality? • Definitely!

  18. Well, ….. NO! …?

  19. ICAO is the • International Civil Aviation Organization • Strategic Objectives: • Safety – Enhance global civil aviation safety • Security – Enhance global civil aviation security • Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development of Air Transport – Foster harmonized and economically viable development of international civil aviation that does not unduly harm the environment

  20. ICAO standards do not apply to Military Aviation. • But… • What happens when • - Civil and military aviation meet? • - Military pilots and air traffic controllers leave the military? • What does this mean for teaching and testing at the Bundessprachenamt? • ??? • Nothing!

  21. Civil Aviation Authorities accept language tests developed and administered by the Bundes-sprachenamt. • There is no need for an “ICAO Test” as such. • Military pilots and air traffic controllers leaving the military do not have to take ICAO tests.

  22. Lessons learned: • The German Air Force wants to be as close as possible to ICAO standards. • They do not want “ICAO language tests”. • They want a combination of SLP and Aviation English tests. • They want a certificate which states that this combination is equivalent to ICAO Level 4, 5 or 6. • The Bundessprachenamt ICAO 4 test will be the exception, not the rule. • ICAO is the key to a stronger position of the Bundessprachenamt.

  23. www.guy-sports.com/months/jokes_aircraft.htm

More Related