1 / 22

Remotely Sensed Estimates of Surface Salinity and Environmental Vibrio in the Chesapeake Bay

Remotely Sensed Estimates of Surface Salinity and Environmental Vibrio in the Chesapeake Bay. Erin Urquhart 1 , Matt Hoffman 2 , Ben Zaitchik 1 , Seth Guikema 1 1 Johns Hopkins University, 2 Rochester Institute of Technology. Chesapeake Bay. Salinity gradient Oligohalic (0-6 ppt )

airlia
Download Presentation

Remotely Sensed Estimates of Surface Salinity and Environmental Vibrio in the Chesapeake Bay

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Remotely Sensed Estimates of Surface Salinity and Environmental Vibrio in the Chesapeake Bay Erin Urquhart1, Matt Hoffman2, Ben Zaitchik1, Seth Guikema1 1Johns Hopkins University, 2Rochester Institute of Technology

  2. Chesapeake Bay • Salinity gradient • Oligohalic (0-6 ppt) • Mesohalic (6-18 ppt) • Polyhalic (18-30+ ppt) • Major inputs • Atlantic Ocean • Susquehanna River • 2-Layer gravitational circulation scheme Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  3. Vibrio in the Chesapeake Bay • V. cholerae • V. vulnificus • V. parahaemolyticus Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  4. Vibrio in the Chesapeake Bay * V. cholerae *V. vulnificus *V. parahaemolyticus Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  5. Pre-existing Empirical Vibrio Models z(V.v)= -7.867 + (0.316 * Temp) + (-0.342 * (|Saln- 11.5|) Jacobs et al., (2010) z(V.c)= -1.1939 + (0.1233 * Temp) – (0.1997 * Saln) – (0.0324 * (Temp * Saln) Louis et al., (2003) f(z)= ez/(1 + ez ) • Probability of occurrence Vibrio spp. models • In situ and modeled temperature and salinity inputs • Need for continuous spatial and temporal data • Use of satellite remote sensing • RS temperature • Satellite-derived salinity Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  6. Neural Network Surface Salinity • Statistically Derived from MODIS-Aqua Ocean Color • Additional RS band ratios • Trained on Mid-Atlantic region • Historical cruise data Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  7. Satellite-derived Salinity Algorithms • - MODIS-Aqua Ocean Color Standard Products • 10 Remote sensing reflectances (visible) • 2003-2010 • - In situ – remote sensed measurement matchups • 68 CBay Program in situ stations • Single pass RS ocean color data • 1km radius RS averaging • 2003-2010 - Salinity Prediction Models • GLM • GAM • ANN • MARS • CART • BCART • RF • BART - Cross- validation study Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  8. Satellite-derived Salinity Algorithms • Top performing prediction models: GAM andANN • All models outperform MEAN • GLM and GAM are fairly generalizable in a • cross-validation study Urquhart et al. (2012). Remotely Sensed Estimates of surface salinity in the Chesapeake Bay: A Statistical Approach. Remote Sensing of Environment. 123: 522-531 Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  9. Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  10. Geostatistical Spatial Interpolation • Prediction of values at unsampled locations based on measured values at locations within the area of interest • Spatial autocorrelation • Observations closer together tend to be more similar than observations farther apart. • Variogram • Quantifies the notion of spatial autocorrelation • Ordinary Kriging • Assumes mean of data is constant • . • Universal Kriging • Uses a general linear regression trend to estimate the mean • . Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  11. Interpolation Results Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  12. Interpolation Results Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  13. Model Comparison Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  14. Model Comparison Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  15. ModelComparison Summary Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  16. Remote Sensing of Vibrio in the Chesapeake Bay z(V.c)= -1.1939 + (0.1233 * Temp) – (0.1997 * Saln) – (0.0324 * (Temp * Saln) Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  17. Remote Sensing of Vibrio in the Chesapeake Bay Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  18. In situ Vibrio Sampling Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  19. Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  20. Vibrio Modeling in the Chesapeake Bay Qualitative - Likelihood of Presence *z(V.spp.)= β0 + β1(Temp) + β2(Saln) + βn(Xn) f(z)= ez/(1 + ez ) Quantitative - Estimation of Cell Concentrations * Zero-Inflated Poisson * Logistic/Tree- GAM Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

  21. Acknowledgments Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab, Carlos del Castillo Johns Hopkins University, Rebecca Murphy Cornell University, Dr. Bruce Monger University of Delaware, Erick Geiger University of Maryland, Bradd Haley, Elisa Taviani NASA Goddard, Molly Brown, Vanessa Escobar Funding Sources Johns Hopkins University

  22. Interpolation Results Urquhart et al. Chesapeake Modeling Symposium 2012 May 21, 2012 Observations and Physical-Biogeochemical Modeling at the Fringes

More Related