E N D
1. Pitt County SchoolsTesting & Accountability
The ABC’s of Public Education
3. Testing & Accountability Services The New ABCs Formula and How growth will be determined
Growth Scores for EOG Reading & Math and EOC subjects are determined by using the same formula
EOG Reading and Math Growth Scores are determined by using two years of scores if available
EOC Growth Scores are determined by using predictor subject(s) – examples (Algebra 1 predictor – 8th Grade EOG Math) & (Physics – Chemistry & Geometry)
4. Testing & Accountability Services Expected Growth
Each student will have a Growth Score for each subject (Read, Math, EOC Courses) if have predictor score(s)
All scores are average to determine Expected Growth for a school (70 (EOC)/140 (EOG) days attendance requirement)
If the average is 0.00 or greater, Expected Growth is met (HS have additional components in the model in addition to EOC scores)
5. Testing & Accountability Services Expected Growth
The other components are changes in drop out rate, competency pass rate and percentages of students meeting the College University Prep/College Tech Prep standards.
Subject to change for 2008
6. Testing & Accountability Services High Growth
The school must make expected growth
60% of students must have positive growth (0 or above)
7. Testing & Accountability Services What impact did the
New Formula have in 2006?
Fewer schools met Expected Growth – 54% (3-8) and 57% (HS)
Fewer schools must High Growth (especially HS) – 10% (3-8) and 18% (HS)
8. Testing & Accountability Services Growth
9. Testing & Accountability Services ABCs Proficiency Subjects
Grades 3-8: EOG Reading & Math, 4th & 7th Writing, 8th Grade Computer Skills and scores from alternate tests
High Schools: EOC courses, 10th grade Writing and scores from alternate tests
All students who take test(s) count – no attendance requirement
10. Testing & Accountability Services ABCs Proficiency (Composite Score)
Do not compare Composite Scores or Proficiency if new tests or less tests in composite
Examples – EOG Math in 2006 was different test than previous year (scores were lower), Writing was not in previous Composites, EOC 2007 Math Subjects (Algebra 1, Algebra 2 & Geometry) & English 1 are new tests (scores are lower especially Algebra 1), EOC 2007 Science Subjects (Chemistry, Physical Science & Physics) are not in the Composite
Do not compare Composite Scores of one school vs. another unless schools have same grade spans
Writing Proficiency and Online Computer Skills has different impact at schools with different grade spans
Examples - Writing – K-4 (approx. 1/5), K-5 (approx. 1/7),
K-8 (approx. 2/15), 4-8 (1/12), 6-8 (approx. 1/8), 7-8 (approx. 1/6)
Online Computer Skills – K-8 (approx. 1/15), 4-8 (approx. 1/12),
6-8 (approx 1/8), 7-8 (approx. 1/6)
11. Testing & Accountability Services
12. Testing & Accountability Services
13. Testing & Accountability Services
14. Testing & Accountability Services NCLB
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
10 Subgroups (School as a whole (All), Black, White, Hispanic, Asian, Native American Indian, Multiracial, Student with Disability (EC), Economically Disadvantaged Students (FRL), Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
Attendance (Grades 3 – 8), Graduation (HS)
Subgroups must have 40 or more students in order to count in either 95% testing requirement or proficiency (also must meet 140 days requirement for proficiency)
How to count – Examples - School met 21/21, School met 10/10
15. Testing & Accountability Services NCLB
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Grades 3 – 8 (EOG Reading and Math -includes Regular and Alternate Assessments)
HS – Students in Grade 10
(English 1/Grade 10 Writing & Algebra 1 or OCS English/Writing and Math)
16. Testing & Accountability Services Call or visit
Donald C. Rhodes
Pitt County Schools
Director of Testing & Accountability
252-830-4225
rhodesd@pitt.k12.nc.us