260 likes | 708 Views
Philosophy. The University is committed to continuous, measurable improvement in all of its endeavors.Every employee is essential to this commitment and must be part of the process. The individual performance review and goal setting must be linked to institutional and unit planning processes. The performance review and goal setting process provides the opportunity for goal setting, self-assessment and professional development planning as well as recognition of meritorious service..
E N D
1. Staff Performance Evaluation Process 2011
3. It doesn’t have to be this way…
5. Two Part Performance Review Process Review Process
Goal Setting
6. Review Process Evaluate performance against the defined job responsibilities.
Measure performance against goals agreed upon by the employee and supervisor at the beginning of the year.
Reflect accomplishments and how they were achieved.
Consider employee’s interaction with the entire University Community as well as the community-at-large.
Identify specific employee needs with suggestions and opportunity to improve.
Ongoing dialogue to ensure mutual understanding of continuing progress.
7. Goal Setting Objectives agreed upon by employee and supervisor for coming year.
Individual goals and objectives must be developed within the context of the unit’s goals and objectives.
8. Specific
Measurable
Achievable
Results-focused
Time-bound
SMART Objectives Specific – Objectives are detailed and focused. Action verbs such as evaluate, complete, develop, define, identify, learn, provide, and maintain, are often used.
Measurable – Objectives must be quantifiable so that it is clear when it has been reached. Cost (reduce expenditures by x dollars), time (shorten process time by x hours), quantity (serve x more clients per day), quality (decrease customer complaints from x to y), and percentage of time (increase child car restraint usage by x%).
Achievable – Objectives can be a “stretch,” but must be attainable and realistic. They should not be too easy or too hard. Within the employee’s control or influence.
Results-focused – Achievement of objectives is measured by outcomes (not activities) such as products, deliverables, and accomplishments. The outcome is a result of activities. Objectives should be relevant to UW’s mission and goals.
Time-focused – Achievement of objectives has a specific deadline and it is clear when has been accomplished. A target date is defined.
Objectives should:
Be relevant to essential duties
Be compatible with the PDQ
Be tied to departmental goals
Specify needed training
According to other sources:
“A” is attainable
“R” is realistic or relevantSpecific – Objectives are detailed and focused. Action verbs such as evaluate, complete, develop, define, identify, learn, provide, and maintain, are often used.
Measurable – Objectives must be quantifiable so that it is clear when it has been reached. Cost (reduce expenditures by x dollars), time (shorten process time by x hours), quantity (serve x more clients per day), quality (decrease customer complaints from x to y), and percentage of time (increase child car restraint usage by x%).
Achievable – Objectives can be a “stretch,” but must be attainable and realistic. They should not be too easy or too hard. Within the employee’s control or influence.
Results-focused – Achievement of objectives is measured by outcomes (not activities) such as products, deliverables, and accomplishments. The outcome is a result of activities. Objectives should be relevant to UW’s mission and goals.
Time-focused – Achievement of objectives has a specific deadline and it is clear when has been accomplished. A target date is defined.
Objectives should:
Be relevant to essential duties
Be compatible with the PDQ
Be tied to departmental goals
Specify needed training
According to other sources:
“A” is attainable
“R” is realistic or relevant
9. Objective:
“Develop a new filing system.”
Standard:
“By Oct 1, 2011, develop a user-friendly filing system that can be implemented in no more than two weeks. Users will be able to find documents the first time they look, 98% of the time.” Objective Example
10. The Performance Evaluation Process This is a continuous process, not an event, with activities throughout the year.
Preparation
Involve the employee
Gather information
The Appraisal Meeting
Put the employee at ease
Be positive and listen
Agree on mutual goals
Follow-through
Regular, positive feedback
Coaching is the keyThis is a continuous process, not an event, with activities throughout the year.
Preparation
Involve the employee
Gather information
The Appraisal Meeting
Put the employee at ease
Be positive and listen
Agree on mutual goals
Follow-through
Regular, positive feedback
Coaching is the key
11. Involve the employee
Agree on a time and place in advance
Ask the employee to prepare a self-evaluation
Gather data
Talk to the employee’s co-workers
Job description
Past performance data
Training records Preparing for the Meeting
12. The Personnel-Management Cycle The personnel-management cycle consists of three parts:
The job description
Ongoing feedback and training
The performance appraisal
The job description should be an accurate reflection of what is expected of the employee.
The personnel-management cycle consists of three parts:
The job description
Ongoing feedback and training
The performance appraisal
The job description should be an accurate reflection of what is expected of the employee.
13. Conducting the Evaluation Meeting Put the employee at ease
State the purpose of the discussion and the advantages of the evaluation system
Build on the employee’s strengths
Listen to the employee
Compare performance to standards
Assign performance ratings
Develop an overall rating
Agree on mutual objectives for the next year
No surprises
Close the discussion Be objective – judge the work results, not the person
Be honest and candid
Be consistent
Document every step in the process
Do it by the book – follow UW policies
Don’t talk too much
Ask for employee’s opinion
Close the discussion:
Summarize the meeting
Sign the appraisal form
Thank the employee and explain the next stepBe objective – judge the work results, not the person
Be honest and candid
Be consistent
Document every step in the process
Do it by the book – follow UW policies
Don’t talk too much
Ask for employee’s opinion
Close the discussion:
Summarize the meeting
Sign the appraisal form
Thank the employee and explain the next step
14. Evaluate employees in their environment
Communicate positive feedback regularly
Coaching is the key Coaching – reinforce, correct, teach new skills, mentor; meet regularly to review progress, add/change goals, provide feedback, reinforce or redirect; keep records and documentation throughout the yearCoaching – reinforce, correct, teach new skills, mentor; meet regularly to review progress, add/change goals, provide feedback, reinforce or redirect; keep records and documentation throughout the year
15. End of Year Development Summary Form Human Resources Office (AC 708)
On-line HR website http://access.nku.edu/hr/index.htm
(click “Manager’s Toolkit Link”)
16. Sections of Development Summary Job Competence and Knowledge
Overall Performance Rating
Documentation Where Performance Needs Improvement
Documentation Where Performance Exceeds Requirements
Comments
17. Adaptability: Adjusts practices in changing environment; adapts to new people, ideas, procedures; searches for self-responsibility as it relates to goals
18. Interpersonal Skills The ability to relate to and interact with others in a positive way that results in cooperation, mutual respect and common goals.
19. Team Player Employee’s success served by cooperating, setting mutual goals and crossing boundaries.
20. Reliability Acceptance of accountability for one’s actions; may include attendance and punctuality. The conscientious fulfillment of one’s obligations.
21. Communication Skills The ability to accurately and effectively transmit and receive information that is necessary to the accomplishment of position responsibilities; keeps subordinates, associates and supervisors informed; listens.
22. Judgment and Decision Making Identifies/evaluates issues; reaches sound conclusions; generates alternatives; understands consequences; makes accurate and timely decisions; attends to detail.
23. Drive and Commitment Maintains high energy level; strives for personal improvement and success.
24. Example of other elements: Safety: follows proper procedures/regulations to allow for the safety of personnel and equipment.
Supervision: demonstrates ability to determine priorities/scheduling of activities to reflect current goals.
Leadership: Guides others to work toward common objectives; commands respect; develops cooperation and teamwork; bias toward action.
Planning: Forecasts needs; sets priorities; effectively uses financial and human resources; proactive.
25. Other elements Inclusion of other elements not listed requires supervisor and employee agreement on the definition and inclusion on the form.
26. Steps Self evaluation
Supervisor evaluation
Meeting to Discuss
Employee review time and follow-up
Department Head signature (input? If so, precedes #4)
VP review (input? If so, precedes #4)
Must be received in HR by 4/8/11
27. Worth repeating… Must be received in Human Resources by:
28. Next Steps Prior to the end of the FY, usually in May, the Vice Presidents will get information on the merit pool.
The Department Heads will ask for a recommendation from the Supervisor.
29. Supervisor recommendations The recommendations should be based on the recently completed evaluation process.
30. Employees notified The Vice Presidents will send a letter to each employee informing them of their merit increase.
31. Guide to Evaluation of Personnel Performance Degrees
32. Guide to Evaluation of Personnel Performance Degrees
33. Guide to Evaluation of Personnel Performance Degrees
34. Guide to Evaluation of Personnel Performance Degrees
35. Guide to Evaluation of Personnel Performance Degrees
36. Guide to Evaluation of Personnel Performance Degrees
37. Guide to Evaluation of Personnel Performance Degrees
38. Why NKU evaluates
Who should be evaluated
Evaluation time-frame
To what end (linked to pay?)
Is there a similar process for faculty?
Review Process Feedback 2010