930 likes | 2.19k Views
A ccelerated B ridge C onstruction. Recent TxDOT ABC Projects. Iowa DOT ABC Workshop August 2008. Dacio Marin III, P.E. Bridge Division Texas DOT. Overview ABC on Off-system bridges ABC on On-system bridges What’s next?. Our Bridges …. 50,000 bridges in the state of Texas
E N D
Accelerated Bridge Construction Recent TxDOT ABC Projects Iowa DOT ABC Workshop August 2008 Dacio Marin III, P.E. Bridge Division Texas DOT
Overview • ABC on Off-system bridges • ABC on On-system bridges • What’s next?
Our Bridges … • 50,000 bridges in the state of Texas • 8% of the total number of bridges in the nation, and • About total number of bridges of the four states that border Texas • TxDOT builds 600~800 bridges each year • 250 bridges each year by others
Typical Off-System BridgeReplacement Environment • Virtually All Stream Crossings • Short Overall Length with 1 – 3 Short Spans • 40 to 80 ft Each Typically • 24 – 30 ft Roadway Width • ADT Usually Low • Greater Probability of Overtopping • Remote and Difficult Site Access • Usually Involve Road Closure • ROW Limits, Existing Structure Make Phasing and Temp. Detours Difficult
Rapid Construction Considerations • Coordinate with local officials • Ensure utilities are clear ahead of letting • Determine working day charges • Consider LDs & road-user costs • Allow adequate time for staging of materials • Traffic, detour route, material delivery
Simplified Geometry • Constant or no skew • No horizontal curves • No flares (width transitions) • No superelevation transitions • Complicated geometry can better be handled on the roadway than the bridge
Design Challenges Shallow depth Longer span Long detour route Phased replacement not feasible
SiteChallenges • Limited ROW • Retaining wall • Existing utilities
Minimum On-Site Construction • Before road closure • Beam, cap, and abutment fabrication • After road closure • Retaining wall construction • Demolition of existing structure • Bridge and approach construction
New Bridge Construction • Total bridge length 100 ft (50’-50’) • Overall width 42 ft • Decked slab beams, precast abutments & bent caps, flowable backfill, steel H-piles, stone riprap • Contract amount $380,700 (bridge only) • $90.60/SF
Steel Anchor Plate and Shear Studs
Flowable Backfill • Fluid mixture of sand, fly ash, water • 40% air-entrainment without compaction • Self-leveling
Construction Highlights • Total 33 days of road closure • 6 days total for bridge construction • Overall cost $90/SF ($43 Superstructure + $47 Substructure)
Advantages ofDecked Slab Beam • Field welding vs. transverse post-tensioning • No cast in place concrete slab • Minimum disruption of traffic • Fewer beams and fewer joints • Low depth/span ratio (up to 1/30) • Reduced SF costs with increased usage
Reduced ramp closure from several weeks to just 6 hours.
Pierce Elevated Faster Rehabilitation: 113 spans in 95 days, vs. 1.5 yrs
Sponsored Research:“Development of a Precast Bent Cap System” • Development of Connection Types • Grout Pockets • Grouted Vertical Ducts • Bolted Connections • Testing Program (Behavior and Constructability) • Phase I - Pullout Tests • Phase II - Full-Scale Connection Tests • Phase III - Full-Scale Bent Tests • Implementation • Sample Details • Design Methodology • Construction Issues and Specifications
Grout Pockets • Technique • precast voids/pockets in cap to contain column connectors • Advantages • flexibility in size and shape • large construction tolerances • simple grouting operation • Disadvantages • cracking potential at large top surface • congestion of reinforcement • larger volume of grout
Grouted Vertical Ducts • Technique • steel corrugated ducts embedded in cap to house column connectors • Advantages • inexpensive stay-in-place ducts • minimal reinforcement congestion • limited exposed top surface • minimal volume of grout • Disadvantages • more difficult grout placement
Bolted Connection • Technique • ducts embedded in cap house threaded rods tensioned at the top surface • Advantages • cap setting via leveling plates/nuts • post-tensioning option • resistance to larger moments • Disadvantages • more difficult grouting operations • protecting/recessing top anchorage
Results of Connection Tests • Phase I anchorage results validated • excellent anchorage and ductility • small crack widths, even at factored loads • no slip between grout, duct, and concrete • shims did not affect performance • yield within 10% of prediction
Lake Ray HubbardPlan View of Project Rockwall Exist Embankment Exist EB Bridge Rowlett
Lake Ray HubbardPlan View of Project Rockwall New WB Bridge Rowlett
Precast Bent Cap Option BENEFITS: TIME, COST, QUALITY, AND SAFETY • Transport of complete caps versus limited volumes of fresh concrete • Bent cap cure time removed from critical path • Controlled environment of casting yard instead of over lake
Final Design • 6 ~ #11 Dowels • 4” Dia. Corrugated Galvanized Steel Ducts • #3 Spiral for Confinement
Precasting Caps Placing Dowels Construction Sequence
Placing Precast Cap Grouting Connection Construction Sequence
Lake Belton Precast Hammer Head Caps Bell County, SH 36 Existing Bridge