300 likes | 717 Views
The Legislation. The Nursing and Midwifery Order (2001) requires the Nursing and Midwifery council (NMC) to set rules and standards (Midwives rules and standards 2004) for the function of statutory supervision of midwives. The UK Framework. LSA - ROLE. Publish how it will meet the 54 standards laid down by the Nursing and Midwifery CouncilAppoints a senior practising midwife as a Local Supervising Authority OfficerAuthorises the selection, preparation and appointment of Supervisor of Midwi1140
E N D
1.
South East Region
NMC Annual Conference
March 2010
Yvonne Bronsky
LSAMO South East Region
3. The UK Framework
4. LSA - ROLE Publish how it will meet the 54 standards laid down by the Nursing and Midwifery Council
Appoints a senior practising midwife as a Local Supervising Authority Officer
Authorises the selection, preparation and appointment of Supervisor of Midwives who function within its boundaries
5. LSA Strategy Strategic Goals
National Standards & Guidelines
Quality Assurance
Networks & Relationships
Professional Leadership
Regulation
www.midwife.org.uk
Progress Report – May 2009Progress Report – May 2009
6. Key Priorities for the LSAMO 1. Framework
Align the Regional LSA function to ensure the Midwives rules and standards are met
2. National Standards and Guidance
Develop new Guidelines
Review and update established guidelines
3 Quality Assurance
Review mechanisms for auditing statutory supervision of midwives and midwifery practice
Maintain consistent LSA standards for statutory supervision of midwives
7.
Networks and Relationships
Maintain effective relationships with key stakeholders e.g. SGHD, NMC, QIS, NES and Care Commission
Encourage public involvement by engagement with service users
Professional Leadership
Provide professional leadership in response to national policy and emerging local service development
Key Priorities for LSAMO
8. NMC framework for Reviewing LSAs On an annual basis the NMC midwifery department will review the LSA profiles to decide which LSAs will be reviewed in the coming year. The decision to review will normally be based on which LSAs may be at highest risk of not meeting the standards and where the greatest risk may be with regards to protecting the public. However, on occasions the midwifery department may select an LSA to be reviewed at random or with a low risk score. This will enable the NMC to audit and test the NMC risk methodology.
The decision to review will normally be based on which LSAs may be at highest risk of not meeting the standards and where the greatest risk may be with regards to protecting the public. However, on occasions the midwifery department may select an LSA to be reviewed at random or with a low risk score. This will enable the NMC to audit and test the NMC risk methodology.
9. Statutory Supervision Assists midwives to develop excellent practice
Supports good clinical governance mechanisms for services
Promotes the sharing of evidence ,knowledge and good practice
Identifies poor practice and puts in place programmes of support
Reduces the risk to women of poor practice and consequent outcomes
Reduces the corporate risk to maternity services.
10. Supervision Assets Legislation & Intention to Practise
Named Supervisory support of each individual midwife
Annual Review with each midwife as well as other contacts throughout the year
Advise and guidance on meeting PREP requirements
Support for midwives requiring development
11. Supervision Assets cont Adviser for clinical policy and guidance
Can lead in audit and research
Investigate and identify poor practice and identify excellence
Provide correction of poor practice by mentorship and example
Act as a change agent to enhance aspects of practice for a whole service
12. The Process of Great Leadership
challenge the process
inspire a shared vision
enable others to act
model the way
encourage the heart
Adapted from “ The Leadership Challenge”
Kouzes & Posner 1987
14. Why Change? Historically in Fife, SOMs were managers
Not very visible presence
Seen sometimes as “policing”
Overlap between management and Supervision
System not used effectively
15. Why us? Various reasons:
Previous experience of Supervision negative
Realisation of possibilities of positive Supervision
Positive experience – wanted to be part of this system
Masters level of study – reflects the standards expected of SOMs
16. Highs Networking
Stimulus of learning
Looking at the bigger picture
Challenge practice
Achievement
17. Lows First cohort
Volume and level of work
Pressures of existing workload
Achieving practical component
Daunting task - question ability to work effectively as a Supervisor of Midwives
18. Best Practices Encourage sharing of experiences
Involvement in groups and committees as SOMs
Newsletters and Supervisory Hour - sharing information
Involvement of student midwives
Protected time
Information given to women at booking
19. Our Vision Support from mentors, LSAMO and other SOMs
Provision of an approachable, co-operative and proactive Supervisory service accessed by midwives and student midwives
Encourage reflection to help identify potential improvements in practice
Enable midwives to take change forward – acting as a leader, supporter and facilitator along the way
20. The First Year…. Joined groups / committees as a SoM, raising profile
Attended Scottish SoM Conference in Stirling
Annual reviews
Record keeping audit
Most recently, NMC Audit
21. The First Year (not only, but also!)….. List of supervisees
ITPs
NMC Student Conference in Edinburgh
Supervisory meetings
On-call SoM (thankfully, no investigations yet!)
22. Lessons learned Learned that:
Effective Supervision is not a passive process - it is a multi-faceted and complex role
We must engender trust, motivation and self-awareness in order to fulfil the role laid down by the NMC
Just the start of a life-long learning process for us as new SOMs
Result in the provision of a high quality, professional service – ensuring the public will be well and truly protected
23. And finally….. Recognised that changes had to be made
Areas of good practice in statutory Supervision which had to be recognised and which could be built on
Important not to throw the baby out with the bathwater
That really would be a Supervisory issue!
25. Midwifery in the Millenium: the Role of the Advanced Midwifery Practitioner in the promotion of normality. Sue Briggs, Angela Chapman, Michelle Barford
On behalf of the team at Diana, Princess of Wales Hospital, Grimsby
Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
26. Advanced Midwifery Practitioner The role was developed in order to continue to provide a comprehensive quality service following :
An acute service review and Trust merger
Implementation of WTD reducing junior doctors hours
Role reconfiguration for junior doctors
Plans at that time to relocate maternity services at Grimsby
First cohort commenced training in 2001
27. Evolvement of the Role The Political climate continues to influence the scope of midwifery practice and boundaries of care are constantly evolving.
The NHS modernisation programme: NHS Plan (DoH, 2000)
Making a difference (DoH 1999)
Ideology that encourages exploration of new midwifery roles Vision 2000 (RCM 2000)
Maternity Matters (DoH 2007)
Safe births, everybody’s business (Kings Fund 2007)
High quality care for all (Darzi 2008)
Standards for maternity care (RCOG 2008)
28. Evolvement of the Role It was envisaged that the Advanced Practitioner would:
Build on and enhance the service
Develop practice according to service needs
Have a dynamic and constantly evolving role
Strengthen relationships with medical colleagues by having enhanced clinical, diagnostic and decision making skills
Be empowered to increase their knowledge and expertise in managing birth and focusing on “women centred care”
29. Who is the Advanced Midwifery Practitioner (AMP)? The AMP is a midwifery clinician who can advance and develop clinical knowledge and skills to promote excellence in maternity care. She is an experienced Labour Co-ordinator
While being trained to an advanced level and able to undertake activities and procedures traditionally practiced by Medical staff the AMP still has a large role to play in the promotion of normality within the maternity services.
30. Training Academic training through local University
Initially input into A33 now Autonomous practitioner programme at degree level
Clinical training with input from Clinical supervisor – lead Consultant for Labour
Competency booklet developed locally
Support from rest of senior medical team and AMPs
31. What extra does the role encompass? Input into medical rota 10 sessions/40 hours per week
Carry 2nd on call bleep instead of SHO
Response to emergencies
1st assistant in theatre
Ventouse practitioner
Ordering of investigations/initiation of treatment/care planning
32. Role Development The role extended beyond the Labour Ward into antenatal, postnatal and neonatal care e.g. maternal admission and discharge; patients reviews e.g. 1st day following operative/ instrumental delivery, examination of newborn
Seamless service, enhanced continuity of care.
Guardian of promotion of normality whilst acknowledging and responding appropriately when deviations from normal occur
Understanding clinical challenges and supporting all colleagues
34. “Personal Considerations” The Advance Midwife Practitioners
Promote a culture of care viewing pregnancy & birth as normal physiological processes.
Are “guardians” of normality of childbirth, whilst acknowledging & responding appropriately when deviations from normal occur.
Through professional collaboration challenge an overly medical model of care.
Remember their “midwifery roots”/ be an advocate for mothers & midwives.
Collaborate with Midwives & Medics to develop EB guidelines supporting practice that promotes normality.
35. “Working with mothers” The AMPs support midwives to:
Identify low risk women & where appropriate promote home birth & MLC.
Help women to view vaginal birth more positively & have confidence in their ability to give birth, breastfeed & be a happy parent.
Provide informal Antenatal education that promotes normality & realistic expectations. e.g. VBAC
Inform women of alternatives to unnecessary medical interventions / work with them to make evidence based informed decisions about their care.
36. “Creating a conducive Environment”The AMPs:- Promote a relaxed atmosphere conducive to normality.
Encourage a “low tech” approach to reinforce concept of minimal intervention.
Maintain a “culture of normality” even when intervention is required, e.g. promote skin-skin following uncomplicated ventouse delivery.
37. “Clinical Practice” The AMPs promote normality by:
Encouraging & supporting less intervention.
Support 1-1 labour care & continuity of care and carer.
Encouraging non supine positions in labour & mobilisation.
Discouraging inappropriate use of EFM Encouraging & supporting IA via Pinnards / doppler. (NICE, 2001)
Encouraging midwives to “get back to basics” by advocating good pressure area, bladder & perineal care.
38. Encouraging & supporting use of non-pharmacological methods of pain relief and coping mechanisms - relaxation, Tens, birthing ball, use of water / birthing pool.
Encouraging appropriate hydration / nutrition.
Supporting physiological management of 3rd stage of labour for low risk women.
Encouraging early skin - skin contact & breastfeeding support
Encouraging midwives to get mothers not in established labour / pre- lab ROM home
Encourage planned early discharge for low risk mothers (possibly facilitated by AMP/midwife discharge exam of newborn).
39. EducationalistsThe AMPs Utilise opportunities for informal teaching.
Are proactive towards multidisciplinary education.
Educate staff about the AMP role (not just for the “abnormal”)
Promote mothers/ midwives educational resources that focus on normality
Facilitate the acquisition of skills/ knowledge in the care of normal low risk mothers.
Remind midwives that “1 intervention leads to another!”
40. Educationalists cont The AMPs are actively involved in the in-house training programme which is multidisciplinary
CTG
Neonatal resus
Obstetric emergencies including drills
HCA training
41. Staff DevelopmentThe AMPs:- Lead & support the developing role of midwives in line with unit philosophy e.g. LDRP & Midwifery led care.
Empower Midwives to have confidence in their ability to manage normal birth using a “ low tech” approach.
Promote discussion around low intervention for low risk women.
Encourage Midwives to think critically & reflect on practice.
Support staff to question & change practice.
42. Research and AuditThe AMPs promote normality by:- Keeping up to date with contemporary issues that focus on normality.
Critically appraising the evidence base for midwifery knowledge & practice.
Considering other National / International
perspectives of care / practice.
Encouraging research awareness
Auditing , reviewing & reflecting on practice.
43. On going Training for AMPs Regular update in ventouse delivery
ALSO refresher
NLS training
Perineal repair training
44. An overview of the AMP role in promoting normality
45. The effects are clear to see Reduced CS rates 17.1% 2009 (16.3% 2008)
SVD rate 71.2% 2009 (70% 2008)
Birthrate plus in 2009 - 45.9% of all births in the unit within the I and II category which is stated in the report as being “significantly higher than found in many units in England.”
Excellent working relationships with senior medical staff . True Team approach
46. The Effects cont Support for junior doctors
Seamless approach to doctors rotation
Challenge practice e.g. induction of labour
Only undertake necessary investigations
Keep a record of cases
47. Acknowledgements Special thanks to Sara Butcher for giving us the presentation and allowing us to adapt and add to it
The rest of the AMP team at DPOW Sara Butcher, Jeanette Rowe and Brenda Waite
The other Co-ordinators Tracy Martin and Carol Horsley
The Consultants; Werner Mueller, Ian Stuart, Arabinda Saha, Ibrahim Bolaji, Silas Gimba and Mahadeeva Manohar
Staff Grades; Shanka Gangophady and Nasser Mohammed
Sheila Youssef Acting HoM, PSM Obs, Gynae & Sexual Health
The Midwives at DPOW, NLAG