1 / 6

CP Lesson 7 – Plain View, Open Fields, Abandoned Property, and Special Needs Searches

CP Lesson 7 – Plain View, Open Fields, Abandoned Property, and Special Needs Searches. Plain View Plain Touch Plain Smell Open Fields Abandoned Property Regulatory Searches Special Needs. Plain View Doctrine. Three Basic Requirements: Lawfully present Immediately recognizable

Download Presentation

CP Lesson 7 – Plain View, Open Fields, Abandoned Property, and Special Needs Searches

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CP Lesson 7 – Plain View, Open Fields, Abandoned Property, and Special Needs Searches • Plain View • Plain Touch • Plain Smell • Open Fields • Abandoned Property • Regulatory Searches • Special Needs

  2. Plain View Doctrine • Three Basic Requirements: • Lawfully present • Immediately recognizable • Plainly visible • Inadvertant - Horton v. California (1990) • Moving stuff – Arizona v. Hicks (1987) • Plain Touch and Plain Smell

  3. Open Fields Doctrine • Doesn’t have to literally be open fields • What constitutes “open field” – Oliver v. US (1984) • What is a home’s “curtilage”? • US v. Dunn (1987) • Dunn Factors • Proximity • Enclosure • Normal uses • Steps taken

  4. Abandoned Property • Lacks 4th Amendment protection • Importance of timing (Hodari) • A reasonable expectation of privacy in your trash? – California v. Greenwood (1988) • Extension – what about where it’s placed? – US v. Certain Real Property (E.D. Mich. 1989).

  5. Regulatory Searches and Inspections • What they are for… health, safety, etc. • Regulatory Searches of Homes (Camera v. Municipal Court). • Administrative Search Warrants • Regulatory Inspections of Businesses • Closely regulated businesses – NY v. Burger (1987) three prong test: • Substantial state interest • Necessary to further regulatory scheme • Statute is adequate substitute for warrant

  6. Special Needs Searches • Probationers’ and Parolees’ Homes • Conditions of the Probation/Parole • Traditionally, “reasonable grounds” • But now Samson v. California (2006). • Searches of Students – TLO v. NJ (1985) • Drug Testing –Veronia v. Acton (1995) and Board of Education v. Earls (2002) • Searches of Inmates’ Cells – Hudson v. Palmer (1984)

More Related