160 likes | 413 Views
Enhancing Denitrification in Rural Streams:Washington County. Joshua Cockroft Johanna Nifosi Robert Johnson Geldar Matungwa Louise Yazzie. Washington County has Agriculture, Forest and Urban Land Use. Washington County is Largely Agriculture. County Ordinance
E N D
Enhancing Denitrification in Rural Streams:Washington County Joshua Cockroft Johanna Nifosi Robert Johnson Geldar Matungwa Louise Yazzie
Washington County has Agriculture, Forest and Urban Land Use
Washington County is Largely Agriculture • County Ordinance • Agriculture accounts for 114,065 acres in 2007 • Located in the Upper Potomac
Nitrogen Content is Directly Related to Agriculture Land Use Only Nitrogen Loads and Concentration with Land Use Nitrogen Loads and Concentration
Types of Permits for N mitigation measures • General permits • Individual permits
Federal and State Agency Roles on Wetland Permits • US. Army Corp of Engineers • US. Environmental Protection Agency • National Marine Fisheries Service • Maryland Department of the Environment • Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Three Creeks with High Levels of Nitrogen Load and Concentration Little Conocheague Creek Meadow Brook Troupe Run
Additional Benefits of Cover Crops • Herbicide reduction • Reduction in insect and nematode control costs • Protection of ground water • Increased water infiltration • Increased soil health.
Maryland Government Supports Water Quality Programs in Washington County • The Maryland Agricultural Water Quality Cost-Share program (1984) provides grants. • $257,648 given to the winter cover crop program in Washington County. • 5,786 acres of the county planted cover crops in 2008-2009.
Cover Crops Significantly Reduce Nitrogen Load • Majority of crops in Washington County in 2007 were Corn and Wheat • In studies, corn/wheat combo found 76% reduction • Significant potential decrease in nitrogen loads, but not below 10,000 kg/m3*yr
Floating Wetlands also significantly decrease nitrogen loads • Contain nutrient consuming wetland plants, they host a nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria on their roots that grow down through the water column. • 47% nitrogen removal in agro lands. • Low cost • Need between 9-13 mats in 1 creek
Pros/Cons of Cover Crops • Pros • Cover crop program already in place • Increased benefits for farmers • Privately run and operated • Cons • Not as efficient • Costs for Farmers to plant • Cover crop program appears to have had not had significant reduction in loads since inception
Pros/Cons of Floating Wetlands • Pros • Low Cost • More Efficient • Not on farmland • Cons • Regulation Permits • Program not in place
References • Maryland Department of Agriculture.2009. Providing grants to help farmers. Accessed from http://www.mda.state.md.us/pdf/macsbrochure07.pdf • Maryland Agricultural Water Quality Cost-Sharing program. 2009 Annual report. Accessed on Nov 6, 2010 from http://www.mda.state.md.us/pdf/macsar09.pdf • Washington County Government. 2010. Accessed on Nov 6 2010 from http://www.washco-md.net/washco.shtm