1 / 13

Procedural Law

Procedural Law. By Felix Romero. Review-Procedural Law. “Mandates the steps in the criminal justice process and provides legal protections for criminal suspects, defendants, and convicted offenders” (Smith 2003). Legal protections from governmental actions are known as constitutional rights.

Mercy
Download Presentation

Procedural Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Procedural Law By Felix Romero

  2. Review-Procedural Law • “Mandates the steps in the criminal justice process and provides legal protections for criminal suspects, defendants, and convicted offenders” (Smith 2003). • Legal protections from governmental actions are known as constitutional rights.

  3. The Criminal Justice Process • Investigation • Searching for Evidence • Interviewing and Questioning • Arrest • Pretrial Process • Initial Appearance • Bail • Preliminary Hearing • Grand Jury • Trial • Trial Process • Trial Decision

  4. Investigation • Searching for evidence • Officers employ broad discretion in conducting investigations. • Individuals are protected by the 4th Amendment which requires the officer to have sufficient information to constitute “probable cause” in order to seek a search warrant (Smith 2003). • However, the U.S. Supreme Court has defined certain situations where the police officers can conduct warrantless searches.

  5. Investigation Con’t • “The purpose of the warrant requirement is to ensure that a neutral, detached decision maker determines that there is an adequate justification before criminal justice officials invade a person’s property” (Smith 2003). • Interviewing and Questioning • 5th Amendment protects people from compelled self-incrimination, and the 6th Amendment guarantees the right to counsel. • Limits police activities in questioning suspects.

  6. Arrest • Police can make arrest without warrants in two situations (Smith 2003): • Use their discretion to make arrest when they have probable cause to believe that a person is committing or has committed a felony. • Officers can make warrantless arrest for misdemeanors committed in their presence that involves a breach of the peace.

  7. Pretrial Process • Initial Appearance • Serves several important purposes (Smith 2003): • If it was a warrantless arrest, the judge must determine if there was probable cause. • Judge informs suspect of their rights. • Judge appoints counsel if the suspect deems that he or she is too poor to afford one. • Bail • Judge sets up bail after the initial hearing. • Involves the suspect putting forward money or property that will be forfeited if he or she does not appear in court.

  8. Pretrial Process Con’t • Initial Hearing • Prosecutor and police present evidence to persuade a judge that there is sufficient evidence to pursue criminal charges (Smith 2003). • Grand Jury • A body of citizens from the community to hear evidence from witnesses to determine if the suspect should be charged.

  9. Grand Jury • If the grand jury determines that there is sufficient evidence, then they issue an indictment which serves as a formal charging mechanism (Smith 2003). • The suspect then goes to the arraignment and is informed of the charges lodged by the prosecutor and/or grand jury (Smith 2003).

  10. Plea Bargaining • Defendant agrees to enter a guilty plea in exchange for lighter sentencing. • Many cases are resolved by plea bargaining (Smith 2003).

  11. Trial • Trial Process • Jury is selected. • Potential jurors may be excluded on two challenges (Smith 2003). • Challenges for cause state that a juror should be excluded because of his or her biases. • Peremptory challenges are exemptions that the prosecutor and defense attorney can use to exclude a juror for no reason. • Limited

  12. Trial Con’t • Trial Decision Making • Prosecutor bears the burden of proof. • Prosecutors must demonstrate guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt” for criminal charges, and a “preponderance of evidence” for civil charges (Smith 2003).

  13. References • Smith, C.E. (2003). Criminal procedure. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Inc.

More Related