410 likes | 772 Views
Announcements. Have posted:Short problem answersLong problem answers (coming soon)Homework Long Problems Due Today Quiz 3 Next WednesdayAll GC topicsHPLC topics we get to today (through aerosol based detectors). Announcements. What we are covering today?HPLC Instrumentation (including the additional topic aerosol-based detectors).
E N D
1. Chem. 230 – 10/26 Lecture
2. Announcements Have posted:
Short problem answers
Long problem answers (coming soon)
Homework Long Problems Due Today
Quiz 3 Next Wednesday
All GC topics
HPLC topics we get to today (through aerosol based detectors)
3. Announcements What we are covering today?
HPLC Instrumentation (including the additional topic aerosol-based detectors)
4. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Mobile Phase Selection
See slide 23 of 10/19/10 lecture for factors influencing selection of mobile phase
Solvents must meet purity requirements (for column and detector functions)
Solvent selectivity issue is important because:
Changing solvent affects retention for different analytes differently
HPLC is less efficient than GC so often more likely to have overlapping peaks
Changes in pH also are important for acidic/basic compounds
5. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Example of solvent changes to affect selectivity:
RP-HPLC Separation of syringols from guaiacols
Difference is in 2nd MeOH group
Water/Acetonitrile eluents produce poor syringol/guaiacol separation factors
Water/Methanol works better (although greater retention with MeOH of syringol is counter intuitive)
6. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Optimization of Mobile Phase Composition
Separation should be perfomed on three different water/organic systems
Then additional separations can be carried out using 3 component mobile phases
Patterns in retention can be used to optimize mobile phase composition
7. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Mobile Phase Selection – pH Buffering
In reversed-phase HPLC, solute generally must be non-ionized to be retained
pH is adjusted by adding buffer in water/organic modifier
pH at pKa means retention factor about half of non-ionized acid retention time
In ion-exchange chromatography, pH should be in range needed to produce ions
In ion-pairing RP-HPLC, an ion-pairing reagent is added
8. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Solvent Flow
HPLC requires high pressures and thus specific pumps
The solvent also needs low levels of dissolved gases for pumps to function
For the simplest “dedicated” HPLC, a single solvent reservoir and pump is needed
For gradients and/or more method development work, switching between different solvents is needed
9. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Pumps
Most pumps use two piston heads 180ş out of phase to reduce pressure fluctuations
Solvents go into and out of piston heads through one-way “check valves”
Exit check valve closes on “in” stroke and entrance check valve closes on “out” stroke
10. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Example of pump with non-functioning check valves
Fluctuation in pressure and signal can occur
Changes to retention time also will occur
11. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Solvent Flow (for gradient/greater flexibility operations)
Dual Pumps (high pressure mixing)
Low Pressure Mixing (stream “open” in proportion to fraction)
12. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Injection Fixed Loop Injectors (see GC slides for diagram)
Used in almost all cases
For some injectors, partial filling of loop is possible (Vinj < Vloop), but then filling precision must be good
Special injection valves needed for small injections (< 1 to 5 µL)
Small injections needed for microbore columns
Sample Matrix
Best chromatography solvent weaker than mobile phase is used, particularly for larger volumes
Remember, weaker solvent allows on-column concentrating
13. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Columns Column dimensions
Length: balance between flow, pressure and efficiency
Diameter:
Choice depends on separation purpose
Preparative for isolation of larger quantities
Microbore usually results in smaller mass detection limits but greater concentration detection limits
Special care is needed using microbore with sample injection, pump stability, and extra-column broadening
14. Liquid ChromatographySome More Questions Why is toluene normally a poor solvent choice in NP-HPLC?
2. A student is running a RP-HPLC separation using methanol and water. The selectivity (a value) is not good. He decides to switch to ethanol in water. Is this a good decision?
A chemist is planning on purchasing an HPLC instrument for developing isocratic analysis methods. Is there an advantage to being able to select multiple solvents?
In order to decrease H in a column, which column or packing material dimension should be changed? and in which direction?
Why would one want to go to a microbore HPLC system?
Why is the decrease in H observed often less than predicted when using smaller diameter packing material or small diameter columns?
15. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Detectors Some Generalizations
Relative to GC, HPLC detectors perform poorly and cost more
Universal Type
UV absorption (also considered selective)
Refractive Index
Aerosol-based detectors
Conductivity (for ion chromatography)
Selective Type
Fluorescence
Electrochemical
Hyphenated Detectors
Photodiode Array Detector (type of UV detector)
Mass Spectrometer
16. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Detectors UV Absorption Detectors
The most common type of detector
Principle: absorption of ultraviolet (or visible) light
Follows Beer’s Law: A = -log(I/Io) = ebC
I = intensity of light (Io for blank)
e = molar absorptivity (constant)
b = path length
C = concentration
Best results for 0.001 < A < 1
Fast response – sensitivity trade off in path length (can select cell volumes)
17. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Detectors UV Absorption Detectors
Sensitivity to Compounds (e values)
Best for compounds with conjugated double bonds, aromatic groups or strongly absorbing functional groups (e.g. R-NO2, R-I, R-Br)
Poor response for compounds with few or weakly absorbing functional groups (worst for R-CN, R-NH2, R-F; poor for R-OR’, R-OH, R-COOH, R-COOR’)
Solvents:
Requires use of solvents that absorb poorly in UV
18. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Detectors UV Absorption Detectors
Wavelength Selection:
Must choose ? > solvent cut-offs
Most compounds absorb strongly at short wavelengths but also at longer wavelengths
More sensitivity at shorter wavelengths (provided little mobile phase absorption)
More selectivity at longer wavelengths
19. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Detectors UV Absorption Detectors
General Properties
Reasonably good (but variable) sensitivity
Good linearity, reproducibility
Good stability (but baseline drift and warm up time)
Poor as a universal detector
Types:
Fixed wavelength (absorption at single wavelength)
Variable wavelength (can select one wavelength using monochromator)
Photodiode array (can measure at multiple wavelengths simultaneously) – these give some qualitative information and allow more peak overlap
20. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Detectors Application of UV Detection to Weak Absorbers
Use short wavelengths (method must be selective; not always effective)
Derivatize compounds to add strong absorber (common for amino acids, carbohydrates)
Use indirect UV absorption (absorber added to eluent, analytes displace eluent and give negative peak)
21. Liquid ChromatographyInstrumentation – Detectors Refractive Index Detectors
Principle:
liquids with different refractive index will diffract light differently
Composition will determine refractive index
Any compound with a refractive index different than the solvent’s is detectable
Advantage:
Most universal detector (can detect weakly absorbing compounds)
Disadvanges:
Gradients are not possible
Requires thermal stability
Generally not very sensitive
22. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Example Student Presentation
23. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Outline Introduction to Technology
Theory Including Three Types of Detectors
Advantages and Disadvantages of ABDs
Some Applications
Conclusions
References
24. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCIntroduction Limitations of Conventional Detectors
UV Absorption Detectors:
Not very universal
Poor sensitivity for many classes of compounds (carbohydrates, fats, amino acids, dicarboxylic acids, etc.)
Refractive Index Detectors:
Low and somewhat variable sensitivity
Not gradient compatible
Mass Spectrometer Detectors:
Not all compounds ionize readily
Expensive
25. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCIntroduction Processes in Aerosol-Based Detectors:
Effluent from column is nebulized producing spray of solvent and solute
Spray droplets are heated in an oven, evaporating solvent gas and producing aerosol particles from solute
Aerosol passes to an aerosol detector to produce a signal
26. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCIntroduction Mobile Phase Requirements
Solvent must be volatile (and cause little column bleed)
Analyte Requirements
Works best if analyte is non-volatile
Semi-volatile compounds give reduced response
27. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCTheory Nebulization produces a distribution of drop sizes
Solvent viscosity and surface tension can affect distribution of droplet sizes
Evaporation shifts this to distribution of particle sizes based on:
where: dd, dp are drop and particle diameters, C is mass concentration, and ?p is particle density
28. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCTheory Types of Aerosol-Based Detectors
Depends on method of detecting aerosol particles
Evaporative Light Scattering Detection (ELSD) (Charlesworth, J. M. Anal. Chem. 1978, 50, 1414)
Condensation Nucleation Light Scattering Detection (CNLSD) (Allen, L. B.; Koropchak, J. A. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 841)
Charged Aerosol Detector (CAD)/Aerosol Charge Detector (Dixon, R. W.; Peterson, D. S. Anal. Chem., 2002, 74, 2930)
29. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCTheory ELSD principles
Detection by light-scattering by particles
Efficient detection when dp ~ ?; less efficient at other sizes
Non-linear response results
At low concentrations, dp < ? so sensitivity is poor (detection limits of around 0.1 to 1 µg mL-1)
30. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCTheory Condesation Nucleation Light Scattering Detection
Detection principle also uses particle light-scattering but overcomes poor detection of small particles by growing small particles to bigger particles by condensation of vapor on to particles
This technology is very sensitive (a single 3 nm particle can be detected)
This can translate to very low detection limits (~10 ppb or ~50 pg) under optimal conditions
Commercialized recently
31. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCTheory Charged Aerosol Detection
Particles charged as aerosol jet collides with ion-rich jet from corona discharge (commercial version)
Charged particles are collected on a filter with charge passed to electrometer (current measured)
In another version, particles are charged as they pass near a corona discharge region
Sensitivity has equalled CNLSD (at least at standard HPLC flows)
Large response range and linearity at lower concentrations
32. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCAdvantages and Disadvantages Advantages:
Better performing universal detectors than refractive index detectors
Universal response for non-volatile analytes
CNLSD and CAD sensitivity is similar to typical UV sensitivity
Disadvantages:
Requires analytes of low-volatility, volatile mobile phases
CNLSD and CAD are often limited by solvent purity and column bleed
Non-linear calibration often is needed
Cost is higher than UV Detectors
33. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCSome Applications Food
ELSD has been used extensively to characterize carbohydrates and lipids.
Methodology requires no derivatizations and allows analysis of whole lipids (as opposed to just fatty acids)
Polymers (with SEC)
Useful for polymers without chromophores
Pharmaceutical Industry
ABDs are useful for assessing contaminants in pharmaceutical products
Biotechnology and Environmental Samples
Greater potential with CNLSD and CAD for analyzing low concentration samples (some carbohydrate examples)
Analysis of Cations, Anions and Neutrals
34. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCTriglyceride Example By Lísa et al (J. Chromatogr. A, 1176 (2007) 135-142).
Homogenous trigylcerides shown above without (left) and with “gradient compensation” (right)
Gradient compensation allows response to remain proportional to area with a gradient
Gradient compensation uses 2 additional pumps pumping eluent after the column to produce a constant eluent composition
Plant oil samples shown below
35. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCPaclitaxel Example By Sun et al. (J. Chromatogr. A, 1177 (2008) 87-91).
Looked at impurities in paclitaxel (a anti-cancer natural product from Pacific yew tree) using UV and CAD
Shown in upper figure (standards – highest and stressed paclitaxel – lower)
Paclitaxel impurity response shown to be uniform by CAD but not by UV detection
Pharmaceutical impurity analysis used for determining acceptable pharmaceuticals
If no standards available, CAD provides better estimation of impurity levels
36. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCSmoke Tracer Example My work (published in Dixon and Baltzell and Ward et al. – see my research webpage)
Detected levoglucosan and related monosaccharide anhydrides
These are thermal breakdown products from cellulose and hemicellulose
It was possible to use the levoglucosan concentrations to estimate the total particulate matter (2.5) derived from woodsmoke
37. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCGlycan Profiling My current work (with Thomas Peavy, Biological Sciences) also preliminary work done by Ignaki et al.
Glycans (glycoprotein oligosaccharides) are difficult to quantify
Glycans are post-translational modifications and composition can depend on host organism/cells
Profiles change in cancer cells
Standards are unavailable or expensive
Currently running surrogate standards to prepare multi-dimensional calibration (depending on mass concentration and retention time)
Test standards show errors of ~0 to 25%
38. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCConclusions ELSD has been replacing RID as a universal detector (at least for non-volatile compounds)
ABDs can be used without exact standards for quantification (much as an FID is used in GC)
Biggest limitations are volatility/non-volatility requirements, cost, and linearity
39. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCReferences ELSD
Text (p. 247-248)
Charlesworth, J. M., Evaporative analyzer as a mass detector for liquid chromatography, Anal. Chem., 50, 1978, 1414-1420.
Review: Koropchak et al., Fundamental Aspects of Aerosol-Based Light-Scattering Detectors for Separations, Adv. Chromatogr. 40, 2000, 275.
CNLSD
Allen, L. B. and J. A. Koropchak, Condensation nucleation light scattering: A new approach to development of high-sensitivity, universal detectors for separations, Anal. Chem., 65, 1993, 841-844.
Same review listed for ELSD
CAD
Dixon, R. W. and D. S. Peterson, Development and testing of a detection method for liquid chromatography based on aerosol charging, Anal. Chem., 74, 2002, 2930-2937.
Gamache, P.H., R.S. McCarthy, S.M. Freeto, D.J. Asa, M.J. Woodcock, K. Laws, and R.O. Cole, HPLC analysis of nonvolatile analytes using charged aerosol detection, LCGC North America, 23, 150, 152, 154, 156, 158, 160-161, 2005.
40. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCReferences For Applications: (See my faculty web page for CAD references)
Foods:
Asa, D., Carbohydrate and oligosaccharide analysis with a universal HPLC detector, Am. Laboratory, 38, 16, 18, 2006.
Moreau, R. A.. The analysis of lipids via HPLC with a charged aerosol detector, Lipids, 41, 727-734, 2006.
Lísa, M., F. Lynen, M. Holcapek, and P. Sandra, Quantitation of triacylglycerols from plant oils using charged aerosol detection with gradient compensation
Pharmaceuticals:
Loughlin, J., H. Phan, M. Wan, S. Guo, K. May and B. Lin, Evaluation of charged aerosol detection (CAD) as a complementary technique for high-throughput LC-MS-UV-ELSD analysis of drug discovery screening libraries, Am. Laboratory, 39, 24-27, 2007.
Sun, P., X. Wang, L. Alquier, C. A. Maryanoff, Determination of relative response factors of impurities in paclitaxel with high performance liquid chromatography equipped with ultraviolet and charged aerosol detectors, J. Chromatogr., A, 1177, 87-91, 2008.
Biotechnology:
Inagaki, S., J.Z. Min, and T. Toyo’oka, Direct detection method of oligosaccharides by high-performance liquid chromatography with charged aerosol detection, Biomed. Chromatgr., 21, 338-342, 2007.
Atmospheric Aerosols:
Dixon, R. W. and G. Baltzell, Determination of levoglucosan in atmospheric aerosols using high performance liquid chromatography with aerosol charge detection, J. Chromatogr. A, 1109, 214-221, 2006.
41. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLCQuestions For a complicated sample with several analytes present at moderate concentrations (around 50 µg mL-1), is it advantageous to use an ELSD (vs. a UV Detector) 1) if the compounds are weak absorbers, 2) if the compounds are strong absorbers? What instrument components will ELSD and CNLSD have in common that are not present in CAD?
ABDs can not detect volatile analytes. How should weakly absorbing volatile compounds be determined?
With a single calibration standard, is it possible to estimate concentrations of unknown compounds (e.g. for compounds without any standards)? and under what conditions?
Protein concentration can be estimated by looking at absorption from aromatic amino acids? Why might using an ABD be a better way of quantifying unknown proteins?
42. Liquid ChromatographyMore Detector Questions A compound has an absorptivity of 493 M-1 cm-1 at 210 nm and 32 M-1 cm-1 at 280 nm. Why would one even consider setting the wavelength to 280 nm?
Describe one way to use a UV detector for detecting weakly absorbing organic compounds.
Describe how you could use a photodiode array detector to determine if the odd shaped peak below is from one or multiple compounds.