280 likes | 810 Views
Trade Disputes in an Unsettled Industry: Mexican Sugar. Sugar cane production is concentrated in the warmer areas of Central Mexico. Source: Rabobank from SAGARPA data. Consumption of sugar by major use categories:2000. Background to conflict. Private management and government intervention
E N D
Sugar cane production is concentrated in the warmer areas of Central Mexico Source: Rabobank from SAGARPA data
Background to conflict • Private management and government intervention • Early attempts to regulate market • Growth from WWII to the 1960’s • Price controls • Decreto cañero • Contrato Ley • Government management of the mills (1970 – 1988) • Profits squeezed • Government rescues mills control goes from19 to 49 out of a total 66 • Productivity falls in mills and campo (4.1 ha.) • Subsidies grow • Mexico shifts from net exporter to net importer
Background to conflict • Government sells the mills (1988 - 1992) • Policy moves to more market orientation • Budgetary concerns also forces sales of state assets • Mills sold in highly leveraged operations – up to 80% • Implicit understanding that tight controls over domestic prices • Yet, imports grew depressing mills sending them anew into crisis • Government support to mills to pay cañeros • Interest rates following economic crisis and debt grows
NAFTA • Mexico negotiates structural change • U.S. and Canada negotiate trade agreement • Mexico negotiations sugar sector • U.S. Negotiates sweetner sector • Mexico net importer of sugar • U.S.net importer of sugar • Mexico and U.S. protect domestic markets • Low level of HFCS trade
NAFTA from agreement to confustion • Net production surplus – the side letters • English definition “shall includeconsumption of high fructose corn syrup provided for in…” • Spanish “la determinación de´excedente de producción neto´incluirá para efectos de Sección A del Anexo Anexo 703.2, fructosa de maíz, descrita...¨ • NPS • U.S. = Psugar – (Consumptionsug + ConsumptionHFCS) • Mexico = (Psugar+PHFCS) – (Consumptionsug + ConsumptionHFCS) • Letter not ratified by Mexican senate • Mexico’s quota en years 7 – 14 fixed at 250,000 MT or “up to” 250,00 • Similar to corn discussions • Mexico goes to panel
NAFTA from agreement to confrontation: HFCS • U.S. surplus corn producer • Government supports (aka subsidies) for corn • HFCS capacity grows • Displaces sugar in carbonated beverages • Limited opportunities for HFCS in other food products Lacks sparkle • Excess capacity looks for new markets • Did it grow looking to Mexico? • Mexico initiates dumping demand • U.S. loses and goes to panel
Mexico’s imports of HFCS Imports of HFCS (55) (‘000 mt) Source: Rabobank with data from the Secretaria de Economia
Efficiency varies greatly from company to company:Time lost in mills Average
Recent events • Consolidation of the milling sector of the industry • GAM goes into default • 2001 found the domestic market in disarray • Low domestic prices • “Dumping of sugar on domestic market” • SAGARPA under state of siege by cane growers and threats by mill workers • Mills of four companies expropriated • Government sets up agency to run mills and to eventually privatize them
Recent events (cont.) • Congress enacts excise tax on HFCS used in soda pop • Congress flexing muscle • Frustrated with slow pace is resolving dispute • Upset with SE decision to negotiate • Cañeros strength in Congress • National Sugar Policy (Feb. 2002) • Bring order to the market • Mixed capital export company • Inventory financing • Modernize market • Contrato Ley • Decreto cañero • Temporary suspension of HFCS tax • Steel for HFCS? • Until Sep. 30 • Criticized by industry and Congress
The future: 2and tier tariffs • Allows for free imports of sugar paying declining tariffs • U.S. WTO sugar quota • Trade policy, foreign policy or subsidies for holders of quotas • Imports of sugar paying tariffs will displace quota sugar • USDA baseline projection document raises question of dumping of Mexican sugar
Over quota tariffs for imports of Mexican sugar into the U.S.(cents per pound)
NAFTA high-tier Mexican sugar exports to the U.S. Source: Rabobank from USDA baseline projections
NAFTA high-tier Mexican sugar exports to the U.S. U.S. WTO import commitment Source: Rabobank from USDA baseline projections
The future: 3 scenarios • U.S.opens market to sugar imports • As Mexican imports grows U.S. recognizes that they can’t compete • Abandons all supports rather than support Mexican industry • 3rd party countries displace Mexican producers • Creation of NAFTA sugar market • Mexico sugar displaces quota sugar • U.S. holders, and others, invest in Mexican mills • Minimal domestic pain • HCFS south and sugar north – happy corn growers and share holders • U.S. refuses to open border
The future: Spoilers • Cuba • Life after Castro • FTAA • Brazil takes over the market (4 cents lbs. break even)