1 / 38

Studies of the MRI with a New Godunov Scheme for MHD:

Studies of the MRI with a New Godunov Scheme for MHD:. Jim Stone & Tom Gardiner Princeton University. Recent collaborators: John Hawley (UVa) Peter Teuben (UMd). Outline of Talk. Motivation Basic Elements of the Algorithm Some Tests & Applications Evolution of vortices in disks

MikeCarlo
Download Presentation

Studies of the MRI with a New Godunov Scheme for MHD:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Studies of the MRI with a New Godunov Scheme for MHD: Jim Stone & Tom Gardiner Princeton University Recent collaborators: John Hawley (UVa) Peter Teuben (UMd)

  2. Outline of Talk Motivation Basic Elements of the Algorithm Some Tests & Applications Evolution of vortices in disks MRI, with comparison to ZEUS

  3. Local simulation Global simulation ZEUS-like algorithms have been used successfully to study the MRI in both 3D global and local simulations Hawley, Gammie, & Balbus 1995; 1996; Stone et al. 1996; Armitage 1998; etc.

  4. These methods have been extended to study the radiation dominated inner regions of disks around compact objects. Equations of radiation MHD: (Stone, Mihalas, & Norman 1992) Use ZEUS with flux-limited diffusion module (Turner & Stone 2001)

  5. e.g. photon bubble instability in accretion disk atmospheres Gammie (1998) and Blaes & Socrates (2001) have shown magnetosonic waves are linearly unstable in radiation dominated atmospheres Turner et al. (2004) have shown they evolve into shocks in nonlinear regime: Limitation is FLD

  6. So why develop a new MHD code? Global model of geometrically thin (H/R << 1) disk covering 10H in R, 10H in Z, and 2p in azimuth with resolution of shearing box (128 grid points/H) would be easier with nested grids. Nested (and adaptive) grids work best with single-step Eulerian methods based on the conservative form MHD algorithms in ZEUS are 15+ years old - a new code could take advantage of developments in numerical MHD since then. Our Choice: higher-order Godunov methods combined with Constrained Transport (CT)

  7. B. Basic elements of the algorithm A variety of authors have combined CT with Godunov schemes previously • Ryu, Miniati, Jones, & Frank 1998 • Dai & Woodward 1998 • Balsara & Spicer 1999 • Toth 2000 • Londrillo & Del Zanna 2000 • Pen, Arras, & Wong 2003 • However, scheme developed here differs in: • method by which EMFs are computed at corners. • calculation of PPM interface states in MHD • extension of unsplit integrator to MHD Gardiner & Stone 2005

  8. The CT Algorithm • Finite Volume / Godunov algorithm gives E-field at face centers. • “CT Algorithm” defines E-field at grid cell corners. • Arithmetic averaging: 2D plane-parallel flow does not reduce to equivalent 1D problem • Algorithms which reconstruct E-field at corner are superior Gardiner & Stone 2005

  9. Simple advection tests demonstrate differences Field Loop Advection (b = 106): MUSCL - Hancock Arithmetic average Gardiner & Stone 2005

  10. Directionally unsplit integration CornerTransportUpwind [Colella 1991] (12 R-solves in 3D) • Optimally Stable, CFL < 1 • Complex & Expensive forMHD... CTU (6 R-solves) • Stable for CFL < 1/2 • Relatively Simple... MUSCL-Hancock • Stable for CFL < 1/2 • Very Simple, but diffusive...

  11. C. Some Tests & Applications Convergence Rate of Linear Waves Nonlinear Circularly Polarized Alfven Wave RJ Riemann problems rotated to grid Advection of a Field Loop (Current Cylinder) Current Sheet Hydro and MHD Blast Waves Hydro implosion RT and KH instability See http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~jstone/tests for more tests.

  12. Linear Wave Convergence(2N x N x N) Grid

  13. 3D RT Instability (200x200x300 grid) Goal: measure growth rate of fingers, structure in 3D A test An application Multi-mode in hydrodynamics Multi-mode in with strong B

  14. Codes are publicly available Code, documentation, and tests posted on web. Download a copy from www.astro.princeton.edu/~jstone/athena.html • Current status: • 1D version publicly available (C and F95) • 2D version publicly available (C and F95) • 3D version being tested on applications (C only) • Expect to release parallelized 3D Cartesian grid code in ~1yr

  15. D. Evolution of vorticity in hydrodynamical shearing disk • HBS 1996 showed nonlinear random motions decay in hydrodynamical shearing box using PPM • Recent work has renewed interest in evolution of vortices in disks, especially transit amplification of leading->trailing waves • 2D incompressible • Umurhan & Regev 2004; Yecko 2004 • 2D compressible • Johnson & Gammie 2005 • 3D anelastic in stratified disks • Barranco & Marcus 2005 • Our goal: Study evolution of vortices in 3D compressible disks at the highest resolutions possible, closely following JG2005

  16. A test: shear amplification of a single, leading, incompressible vortex Initial vorticity (kx/ky)0 = 4

  17. KE is amplified by ~ (kx/ky)2 : can code reproduce large amplification factors? Johnson & Gammie 2005 Dimensionless time: t = 1.5W t + kx0/ky

  18. There is no aliasing at shearing-sheet boundaries using this single-step unsplit integrator Trailing wave never seeds new leading waves

  19. Evolution of specific vorticity Initially W(k) ~ k-5/3 2D 5122 simulation Box size: 4Hx4H Evolved to t=100 y x

  20. Comparison of evolution in 2D and 3D Wz initialized identically in 2D and 3D Random Vz added in 3D 2D grid: 2562 (4Hx4H) 3D grid: 2562x64 (4Hx4Hx1H) 2D simulation T = 0.5W t

  21. T = 2W t

  22. T = 5W t

  23. T = 10W t

  24. T = 20W t In 2D, long-lived vortices emerge In 3D, vorticity and turbulence decays much more rapidly

  25. Evolution of KE: 2D versus 3D NB: Initial evolution identical

  26. Evolution of Stress: 2D versus 3D In 2D, long-lived vortices emerge In 3D, vorticity (and KE and stress) decays much more rapidly Further 3D runs in both stratified and unstratified boxes warranted

  27. E. MHD studies of the MRI Start from a vertical field with zero net flux: Bz=B0sin(2px) Sustained turbulence not possible in 2D – dissipation rate after saturation is sensitive to numerical dissipation

  28. 2D MRI Animation of angular velocity fluctuations: dVy=Vy+1.5W0x shows saturation of MRI and decay in 2D 3rd order reconstruction, 2562 Grid bmin=4000, orbits 2-10

  29. Magnetic Energy EvolutionZEUS vs. Athena Numerical dissipation is ~1.5 times smaller with CTU & 3rd order reconstruction than ZEUS.

  30. 3D MRI Animation of angular velocity fluctuations: dVy=Vy+1.5W0x Initial Field Geometry is Uniform By CTU with 3rd order reconstruction, 128 x 256 x 128 Grid bmin= 100, orbits 4-20 Goal: Since Athena is strictly conservative, can measure spectrum of T fluctuations from dissipation of turbulence Requires adding optically-thin radiative cooling

  31. Stress & Energy for <Bz>  0 No qualitative difference with ZEUS results (Hawley, Gammie, & Balbus 1995)

  32. Energy Conservation Saturation implies: Previously observed for ReM = 1 (Sano et al. 2001).

  33. Dependence of saturated state on cooling Red line: no cooling; Green line:tcool = Q Internal energy Magnetic energy Reynolds stress Maxwell stress Cooling has almost no effect except on internal energy

  34. Density Fluctuations • Compressible fluctuations lead to spiral waves & M ~ 1.5 shocks • Temperature fluctuations are dominated by compressive waves. • Will this be a generic result in global disks?

  35. Going beyond MHD If mean-free-path of particles is long compared to gyroradius, anisotropic transport coefficients can be important (Braginskii 1965) Generically, astrophysical plasmas are diffuse, and kinetic effects may be important in some circumstances These effects can produce qualitative changes to the dynamics: e.g. with anisotropic heat conduction, the convective instability criterion becomes dT/dz < 0 (Balbus 2000)

  36. Evolution of field lines in atmosphere with dS/dz > 0 and dT/dz < 0 including anisotropic heat conduction, Stable layer Unstable Stable layer z Details: 2D 1282 , initial b=100, Bx proportional to sin(z), fixed T at vertical boundaries, isotropic conduction near boundaries

  37. Summary • Developed a new Godunov scheme for MHD • Code now being used for various 3D applications • Evolution of vortices in disks • Energy dissipation in MRI turbulence • Further algorithm development is planned • Curvilinear grids • Nested and adaptive grids • Future applications • 3D global models of thin disks • Fragmentation and collapse in self-gravitating MHD turbulence • Beyond ideal MHD • Kinetic effects in diffuse plasmas • Particle acceleration (CRs are important!) • Dust dynamics in protoplanetary disks

  38. A. Astrophysical motivation • Accretion disks • Star formation • Protoplanetary disks • X-ray clusters • Numerical challenges • 3D MHD • Non-ideal MHD • Radiation hydrodynamics (Prad >> Pgas) • Nested and adaptive grids • Kinetic MHD effects

More Related