1 / 39

Indian Country Business Summit Lawton, OK August 23-25, 2009

Interior's Mission.

Pat_Xavi
Download Presentation

Indian Country Business Summit Lawton, OK August 23-25, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    24. PARTNERING WITH BIA AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS Jocelyn LittleChief ICBS Lawton, OK August 2009

    25. STRUCTURE OF BIA TWELVE REGIONAL OFFICES EACH REGIONAL OFFICE HAS VARIOUS AGENCIES UNDER IT’S JURSIDICTION

    26. STRUCTURE OF BIA SOUTHERN PLAINS REGIONAL OFFICE ANADARKO, OK SERVES 25 TRIBES EASTERN OKLAHOMA REGIONAL OFFICE MUSKOGEE, OK SERVES 23 TRIBES

    27. BIA RESPONSIBILITY BIA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR; ADMINISTRATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS, AND FOR PROMOTING INDIAN SELF-DETERMINATION

    28. INDIAN SELF DETERMINATION ACT 1975 Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (PL 93-638) Gives Indian Tribes/Alaskan Natives the authority to contract with the Government, services, functions or activities administered by DOI/BIA that are not considered to be inherently federal activities.

    29. BUY INDIAN ACT AUTHORITY Act of June 25, 1910 (25 U.S.C. 47) Commonly referred to as the Buy Indian Act 41 U.S.C. 253(c)(5) Which permits negotiation of contracts when authorized or required by statute.

    30. BUY INDIAN ACT HISTORY Oldest of the Indian Preference laws on the books, adopted in 1910 Applies to BIA and IHS Applies to direct contracts let by these two agencies

    31. BUY INDIAN ACT ANDRUS VS. GLOVER 1980 US Supreme Court ruled BIA could not use the Buy Indian Act on road construction projects and, by implication, on any other kind of construction Court held that Congress had implicitly release the application of the Buy Indian Act to construction when it enacted the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1983.

    32. BUY INDIAN ACT ANDRUS VS. GLOVER Recent Laws have had the effect of correcting most of the damage done by Glover First step when congress enacted the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (STAA) When authorizing these funds, Congress specifically provided that Buy Indian applied to construction contracts let with these funds.

    33. BUY INDIAN ACT ANDRUS VS. GLOVER All BIA road construction projects are now funded with funds from STAA, so all BIA road contracts are now to be let pursuant to Buy Indian. With the exception of Oklahoma.

    34. BUY INDIAN ACT ANDRUS VS. GLOVER Justice Department went to the Oklahoma Federal District Court, that had issued the original injunction against the BIA in the Glover case. Justice asked court to remove the injunction in light of the provisions in the STAA

    35. BUY INDIAN ACT ANDRUS VS. GLOVER Oklahoma Federal District Court did so only partially. It held that STAA Buy Indian provision applied only to “reservation roads” Since Oklahoma has no reservations, it does not apply

    36. P.L. 93-638 ACT Section 7(b) states: Any contract, subcontract, grant or subgrant pursuant to this Act or any other Act authorizing federal contracts with or grants to Indian organizations or for the benefit of Indians, shall require that to the greatest extent feasible;

    37. P.L. 93-638 ACT Preferences and opportunities for training and employment shall be given to Indians Preferences in the award of subcontracts and subgrants shall be given to Indian organizations and to Indian-owned economic enterprises

    38. P.L. 93-638 ACT 7(b) has been interpreted by the courts and the federal agencies to require preference to the greatest extent feasible, in contracting and subcontracting on (1) all federally-funded prime contracts for the benefit of Indian (2) all subcontracts on direct federal and federally funded (3) preference in employment on all contracts where the contract is for the benefit of Indians

    39. QUESTIONS

More Related