1 / 5

Attachment in Adulthood

Attachment in Adulthood. Simpson, J. S., & Rholes, W. S. (1998). Attachment in adulthood. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 3-21). New York: Guilford Press. Two Traditions. Two Traditions (cont.). Attachment in Nuclear Families

Patman
Download Presentation

Attachment in Adulthood

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Attachment in Adulthood Simpson, J. S., & Rholes, W. S. (1998). Attachment in adulthood. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 3-21). New York: Guilford Press.

  2. Two Traditions Dr. Ronald J. Werner-Wilson

  3. Two Traditions (cont.) • Attachment in Nuclear Families • Measurement relies primarily on attachment interviews to assess adults’ memories of childhood experiences with their parents. • Primary interview protocol: Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) developed by George, Kaplan, & Main. • Most often used to investigate influence of adult attachment style on attachment style of child, parenting style, or other aspects of the parent-child relationship. • Attachment to Contemporary Peers and/or Romantic Partners • Assumption: “romantic love is fundamentally an attachment process through which affectional bonds are formed” (Simpson & Rholes, 1998, p. 6). • Measurement relies primarily on self-report instruments to assess perception of current relationship experiences with peers or romantic partners. Dr. Ronald J. Werner-Wilson

  4. Two Traditions (cont.) • Research suggests that there is limited correspondence between AAI and measures of adult romantic attachment. • Simpson & Rholes suggest that lack of correspondence should not be surprising because they measure different dimensions of attachment: “the two traditions should provide unique information about an individual’s attachment history in different kinds of relationships experienced at different points in time” (1998, p. 6; emphasis added). • Important distinction to amplify: the AAI measures perception of relationship with parents to predict caregiving while measures or peer/romantic attachment assess contemporary relationships with other adults. • Methodological issue: different forms of measurement (e.g., self-report versus observational) do not often correspond because they seem to measure different perceptions (e.g., insider versus outsider views). Dr. Ronald J. Werner-Wilson

  5. Advances in Adults Attachment • The Nuclear Family Tradition • The Peer/Romantic Partner Tradition • Identification of two forms of avoidant attachment in adult romantic relationships was a divergence from the other tradition: • Secure: positive view of self and others. • Preoccupied: negative self views and positive (yet apprehensive) views of others. • Fearful-avoidant: negative views of self and others. • Dismissing-avoidant: positive self views but negative views of others. • Conceptualization of attachment as a continuous rather than a categorical variable. Dr. Ronald J. Werner-Wilson

More Related