210 likes | 588 Views
Child Care Provision In Australia. The Impact of the Collapse of a Large Provider. Background. Child Care in Australia. Child care provision exist in Australia has a strong emphasis on provision by private-for-profit providers. In 2004-05 of all child care services:
E N D
Child Care ProvisionIn Australia The Impact of the Collapse of a Large Provider
Child Care in Australia • Child care provision exist in Australia has a strong emphasis on provision by private-for-profit providers. In 2004-05 of all child care services: • 71% for profit were privately managed • 26% were community managed or not for profit • 3% were Government • More than half the child care services in Australia are operated by small providers who have between 1 and 3 centres/services. • Government subsidies are largely in the form of fee reimbursements to parents (available to services that meet quality assurance requirements).
The Growth of a Major Corporate Provider • ABC Developmental Learning Centres was founded in 1998 (mainly targeted long day care centres with children aged 0-5) • ABC expanded over the next three years, reaching 43 child care centres by June 30, 2001. • By November 2005, it had 697 Early Childhood Education centres throughout Australia and New Zealand. • By July 2007, it ran 1084 centres in Australia; around 25% of all child care services.
ABC at the Time of the Collapse • 1037 child care centres in Australia • 25% of Long Day Care market • Over 100,000 children • 16,000 staff • $1.43 Billion debt • $88.5 Million annually in Government Child Care Benefit • 1,000 centres also in USA, 100 in UK and 100 in NZ
What was Right with ABC? • Accreditation standards • Staff qualifications • Support for staff • Building standards • Opening hours • Services provided • Value for money • Brand recognition
What was Wrong with ABC? • Company financial records • Lack of autonomy for centre staff • Insular organisation • Top heavy with administrative staff • Contributed to oversupply of child care places • Complicated and expensive lease/building arrangements • Debt driven, ruthless acquisition policy • Complex organisation and governance structure
Chronology of Events March 2008 – Reports Eddy Groves had sold almost all his stake in the company. ABC’s share price plummets. Company enters voluntary trading halt. September 2008 – Company cannot provide end of year results- leads to further drop in share price and trading halt extended. 24 September 2008 -Child Care Industry Taskforce (CCIT) established. 30 September 2008 - Eddy and Le Neve Groves resign all management and Board positions at ABC Learning 10 October 2008 - ABC Board acknowledge that their financial circumstances are far more serious than was previously apparent to them. 6 November 2008 - ABC Learning enters voluntary administration and a Receiver is appointed.
Why did the Government Need to Respond? • Possible major social and economic disruption in many Australian communities. • Employees were likely to have been terminated without their entitlements being paid. • There was likely to have been extended confusion and chaos while the business issues were resolved.
How Did the Government Respond? • 7 November 2008 – Government announces $24 million support package to keep centres operating to 31 December 2008 • 10 December 2008 – McGrathNicol announces that 55 centres will close at the end of the year, 720 will continue as ABC with the intention of selling as a single group. • 10 December 200 –Government announces a further $34 million package to fund the remaining 262 “unviable” centres (ABC 2) pending their sale. • Remaining 262 “unviable centres” transferred to a new company (ABC2) placed in hands of Court Appointed Receiver.
What did the CAR do? • Undertook process for the sale of the unviable centres • Negotiated the sale, transfer or closure of all the ABC2 centres • Managed the contract with McGrathNicol to continue the day to day operation of the centres. • Assisted families at closing centres to secure suitable alternative care. • Assisted staff at closing centres to secure comparable employment
The Court Appointed Receiver (CAR) Of the 262 ABC2 centres: • 34 centres were sold to 5 different not-for-profit operators. • 202 centres were sold to for-profit operators • 26 have been closed
Establishment of Not-For-Profit Syndicate: GoodStart • ABC Receiver, announce process for the sale of remaining 720 ABC centres on 31 August 2009. • GoodStart (made up of four non-profit organisations) is established with philanthropic investment and loans from the Australian Government. • A new level of collaboration and cooperation between the Government, the not-for-profit sector and private investors. • GoodStart: emphasis on quality, aims to create a vibrant, child-focussed early learning organisation.
Final Outcome • Of the ABC centres not transferred to the Court Appointed Receiver: • 16 centres were dealt with prior to the sale process, and 706 were offered for sale. • 571 centres have been purchased by GoodStart. • GoodStart is negotiating to purchase another 107 centres. • The Receiver has negotiated the sale of another 24 centres. • The Receiver was unable to secure purchasers for 4 centres which have or will soon close.
Post ABC Collapse • Over 90 per cent (952 out of 1037) of the original ABC Learning Centres operating in Australia at the time of the collapse are still operating today. • After the GoodStart sale the projected long day structure is: • Privately managed (64%) • Community managed or not for profit (34%) • Government (3%)
Reducing the risk of a similar corporate collapse • New operators must demonstrate that they are suitable to operate a child care centre. • Operators must give 42 days notice before they close a child care centre. • Monitoring of child care centres has been strengthened. • A new civil penalty regime has been introduced. • In the 2009-10 Budget, the Government, subject to consultation, announced plans to: • The financial viability of large Long Day Care (LDC) providers will be assessed before they are approved for Child Care Benefit (CCB) and will be reassessed each year. • The Minister for Education will have new powers to commission an independent, confidential investigation or audit.