210 likes | 603 Views
Chief of Defense Nuclear Safety. RoleFunctionsActivitiesStaff. CDNS Role. Support the Central Technical Authority in establishing and implementing nuclear safety policies, regulations, and Directives in a consistent and effective manner.Encourage, challenge and assist Site Offices and HQ elemen
E N D
1. NNSA Chief of Defense Nuclear Safety Jim McConnell
ISM Workshop
January 10, 2006
2. Chief of Defense Nuclear Safety Role
Functions
Activities
Staff
3. CDNS Role Support the Central Technical Authority in establishing and implementing nuclear safety policies, regulations, and Directives in a consistent and effective manner.
Encourage, challenge and assist Site Offices and HQ elements in promoting nuclear safety consistent with the principles of Integrated Safety Management.
Promote the elimination of hazards where plausible and the development of effective controls to reduce risks.
Ensure technical inquisitiveness by promoting technical debate and serving as the focal point for addressing complex-wide safety issues affecting nuclear facilities.
4. CDNS Functions Evaluate requirements in contracts to ensure that nuclear safety is adequately covered.
Evaluate requests for exemptions from nuclear safety requirements.
Review safety-related R&D needs to be included in the annual budget and planning cycle.
Coordinate the NNSA review of DOE nuclear safety Directives and Standards. Coordinate the preparation of nuclear safety guidance for the CTA to issue for NNSA use.
Direct the NNSA Differing Professional Opinion Process.
5. CDNS Functions (continued) Evaluate nuclear safety-related documents such as DSAs, TSR, ISMS Descriptions and SNRs to maintain operational awareness of nuclear safety performance.
Conduct on-site reviews (including Biennial Reviews) of NNSA sites to ensure that nuclear safety requirements and guidance are implemented appropriately and effectively.
Evaluate the selection, training, and qualifications of NNSA nuclear safety personnel.
Publish quarterly NNSA Technical Bulletins.
Provide guidance, advice, and assistance to NNSA HQ and Site Office management in the implementation of DOE 0 425.1 C, Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities.
6. CDNS Activities Biennial Reviews
Recommendations 2004-1 & 2004-2
Integration of Safety into Design
Delegation of Authority
Review of Contractual Requirements
Operational Awareness
7. CDNS Staff Chemical – Jim Poppiti
Electrical – William (Ike) White
Facilities/Design – Jeff Kimball
Fire Protection – Sharon Steele
Nuclear – Don Nichols
Operations – Dick Crowe
Safety Basis – Pat Cahalane
9. High Reliability Organizations What is High Reliability Organizational Theory?
How are HRO principles being incorporated into ISM?
10. Normal Accident Theory Complex, Tightly-Coupled Systems
Opacity
Latent Failures
Normalization of Deviation
Practical Drift
11. High-Reliability Organization Theory Characterized by a high cultural value on safety, effective use of redundancy, continuous learning, and questioning attitude
Elements
extraordinary technical competence
sustained high performance
processes that reward the discovery and reporting of errors
equal value placed on reliable production and operational safety
a strong institutional safety culture
13. Tie Between HRO and ISM ISM Guiding Principles
Supplemental Guiding Principles
Similar to INPO “Principles of a Strong Safety Culture”
14. ISM Guiding Principles Line Management Responsibility for Safety
Clear Roles and Responsibilities
Competence Commensurate with Responsibilities
Balanced Priorities
Identification of Safety Standards and Requirements
Hazard Controls Tailored to Work Being Performed
Operations Authorization
15. INPO Safety Culture Principles Nuclear safety is everyone’s responsibility.
Leaders demonstrate commitment to safety.
Trust permeates the organization.
Decision-making reflects safety first.
Nuclear is recognized as different.
A questioning attitude is cultivated.
Organizational learning is embraced.
Nuclear safety undergoes constant examination.
16. ISM Supplemental Guiding Principles Operational Excellence
Individual Attitude and Responsibility for Safety
Oversight for Performance Assurance
Organizational Learning for Performance Improvement
17. Operational Excellence Leadership involvement and awareness
Attention to detail
Open and candid 2-way communications
Healthy skepticism
Flexible decision-making based on expertise and experience
Organizational redundancy for defense-in-depth
18. Individual Attitude and Responsibility for Safety Workers actively involved in work planning and monitoring of safety
Personnel anticipate and prepare for problems – mindfulness
Questioning attitude, awareness of conditions
Prompt reporting of problems and errors
Strong bias toward resolution of degraded conditions rather than acceptance or even compensation
19. Oversight for Performance Assurance Robust, frequent, and independent oversight at all levels
Oversight and feedback are valued by the line and are “value-added”
Assessment data is complete, accurate, and forthright
Leaders are involved in oversight and model constructive response to oversight
20. Organizational Learning Multiple sources of information
High levels of trust – information reported without fear of retribution
Reviews and critiques conducted promptly and often
Root causes of issues are identified and effective corrective actions are tracked to closure and verified
21. Conclusion ISM Works
existing Guiding Principles and Core Functions are clear and generally well-implemented
HRO principles add needed additional attention to safety culture
Example of a learning organization learning from external events