1 / 59

Region I IPP Infrastructure Updates Advisory Board Meeting November 12, 2009 Boston, MA

Region I IPP Infrastructure Updates Advisory Board Meeting November 12, 2009 Boston, MA. Data Overview. Positivity Progress towards Regional Goals and Objectives. Chlamydia Positivity in Region I Family Planning Females by Year. % Positive.

Rita
Download Presentation

Region I IPP Infrastructure Updates Advisory Board Meeting November 12, 2009 Boston, MA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Region I IPP Infrastructure Updates Advisory Board Meeting November 12, 2009 Boston, MA

  2. Data Overview • Positivity • Progress towards Regional Goals and Objectives

  3. Chlamydia Positivity in Region I Family Planning Females by Year % Positive

  4. Chlamydia Positivity in Region I Family Planning Females by Year % Positive

  5. Regional Goals and Objectives Objective 1.1 By 2010, increase CT screening by 10% of sexually active 15-24 year old women and men. Using 2004 data as the baseline, increase from 38,718 to 42,590 in IPP sites.

  6. Objective 1.1

  7. Objective 1.1

  8. Regional Goals and Objectives Objective 2.2 By 2010, no more than 5% of women more than 25 years of age with no risk factors will be screened in IPP-funded clinics (i.e., 95% will be screened according to regional screening criteria).

  9. Risk FactorsFamily Planning Clinics, Women, 25+(Objective 2.2: ≥95% screened)

  10. Provider Assessment • Highlights • Screening behavior • Knowledge of CDC screening criteria • Significance • State Specific Results • Next Steps

  11. Provider Assessment

  12. Provider Assessment

  13. Provider Assessment

  14. Provider Assessment

  15. Provider Assessment

  16. Provider Assessment

  17. Provider Assessment

  18. Provider Assessment

  19. Provider Assessment

  20. Provider Assessment

  21. Provider Assessment

  22. Provider Assessment

  23. Provider Assessment

  24. Provider Assessment . No screening criteria for males. , or symptoms.

  25. Provider Assessment

  26. Provider Assessment

  27. Provider Assessment

  28. Provider Assessment criteria for males. or symptoms.

  29. Provider Assessment

  30. Provider Assessment

  31. Provider Assessment

  32. Provider Assessment

  33. Provider Assessment

  34. Maps OVERVIEW BULLET POINTS HERE

  35. Maps

  36. Maps

  37. Maps

  38. Maps

  39. Maps

  40. Maps

  41. Maps

  42. Maps

  43. Maps

  44. Maps

  45. Questions?

  46. Other Activities • Cost Analysis Definitions/Glossary PTO IHS

  47. Connecticut Risk FactorsFamily Planning Clinics, Women, 25+(Objective 2.2: ≥95% screened)

  48. Maine Risk FactorsFamily Planning Clinics, Women, 25+(Objective 2.2: ≥95% screened)

  49. Massachusetts Risk FactorsFamily Planning Clinics, Women, 25+(Objective 2.2: ≥95% screened)

More Related