1 / 33

Philosophy and Arguments

Philosophy and Arguments. Outline. 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound . 2. Conditionals . 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments. Outline. 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound . 2. Conditionals . 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments.

Roberta
Download Presentation

Philosophy and Arguments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Philosophy and Arguments

  2. Outline 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound 2. Conditionals 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments

  3. Outline 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound 2. Conditionals 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments

  4. Argument: a sequence of sentences where one (the conclusion) is meant to follow from or be supported by the others (the premises). Arguments Premise 1 Premise 2 Conclusion P1 All men are mortal. P2 Socrates is a man. C. Socrates is mortal. Arguments can be: Valid / Invalid Sound / Unsound

  5. Valid Arguments Valid Arg.: • The conclusion logically follows from the premises • An argument where it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. P1 All men are mortal. P2 Socrates is a man. CC Socrates is mortal. P1 All cats are reptile. P2 Bug Bunny is a cat. CC Bugs Bunny is a reptile. VALIDITY = LOGICAL FORM

  6. Valid Arguments Attention! • Just because an argument is valid, it does not mean that its conclusion is true • Just because an argument is invalid, it does not mean that its conclusion is false. P1 All cats are reptiles. P2 Bugs Bunny is a cat. CC Bugs Bunny is a reptile. P1 If Bugs Bunny has big ears, then he is a reptile P2 Bugs Bunny is a reptile . CC Bugs Bunny has big ears. But if the premises are true and the argument is valid, then the conclusion is always true

  7. Valid Arguments : Exercise I Your high idle is caused either by a problem with the transmission, or by too little oil, or both. You have too little oil in your car. Therefore, your transmission is fine. II If the moon is made of green cheese, then cows jump over it. The moon is made of green cheese. Therefore, cows jump over the moon. III Either Colonel Mustard or Miss Scarlet is the culprit. Miss Scarlet is not the culprit. Hence, Colonel Mustard is the culprit. IV All engineers enjoy ballet. Therefore, some males enjoy ballet.

  8. Sound Arguments Sound Argument = VALID + TRUE PREMISSES Sound arguments always have true conclusions.

  9. An argument which is valid but not sound: P1. If the moon is made of green cheese, then cows jump over it. P2. The moon is made of green cheese. CC Therefore, cows jump over the moon. Valid vs Sound Sound Arg: P1 Prof. Le Bihan’s baby is a girl or a boy. P2 Prof. Le Bihan’s baby is not a boy. CC. Prof. Le Bihan’s baby is a girl.

  10. Conclusion: Good and Bad Arguments To Remember: distinction valid / sound arguments Good arguments are SOUND, ie are valid and possess true premises – They support the conclusion Bad arguments are either: • Invalid : the logical form is incorrect, or • Unsound: the premises are false  These are the two ways in which you can criticize an argument from a philosopher !

  11. Arguments: Exercise! If Socrates is a man, then Socrates is mortal. Socrates is a man. So, Socrates is mortal. If Socrates is a horse, then Socrates is mortal. Socrates is a horse. So, Socrates is mortal. If Socrates is a horse, then Socrates has four legs. Socrates is a horse. So, Socrates has four legs. If Socrates is a horse, then Socrates has four legs. Socrates doesn’t have four legs. So, Socrates is not a horse.

  12. Arguments: Exercise! If Socrates is a man, then he’s a mammal. Socrates is not a mammal. So Socrates is not a man. If Socrates is a horse, then he’s warm-blooded. Socrates is warm- blooded. So Socrates is a horse. If Socrates was a philosopher then he wasn’t a historian. Socrates wasn’t a historian. So, Socrates was a philosopher.

  13. Outline 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound 2. Conditionals 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments

  14. Conditionals Conditional : IF P THEN Q / P  Q Necessary and Sufficient conditions: IF P THEN Q P Sufficient Q Necessary If you are pregnant then you put on weight

  15. Conditionals: Exercise! – to be over 16 / to be legally driving – to be human / to be an animal – to be alive / to be sick – to be alive / not to be dead – to be rectangular / to be square – to be possible / to be real – to do your homework / to get a good grade

  16. Conditionals Attention: IF P THEN Q is NOT equivalent to IF Q then P If you are pregnant, you put on weight Is NOT equivalent to: If you put on weight then you are pregnant

  17. Contrapositions Contraposition: IF P THEN Q is equivalent to IF not Q then not P If you are pregnant, you put on weight IS equivalent to: If you DON’T put on weight then you are NOT pregnant

  18. Conclusion on Conditionals To Remember: • What a conditional is • The distinction between necessary and sufficient conditions • The notion of contraposition

  19. Conditionals: Exercise! –You don’t drink? Oh, then you must be pregnant! – You’re pregnant? Oh, poor girl, you’re stuck with carrot juice then! – No pregnant women drink alcohol – You are drinking tonight? I see, you are not pregnant yet. – Wait, you are not pregnant, right? So, you are drinking tonight! – If Justin is pregnant then he does not drink

  20. Outline 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound 2. Conditionals 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments

  21. IF P THEN Q If you are pregnant, then you gain weight Using a conditional the wrong way Two ways to use a conditional the wrong way: Affirming the consequent/ Denying the antecedent

  22. Circular arguments assume what they want to prove. Circular Arguments The police did not beat the suspect because beating suspects in not something that police ever do. We know that God exists, because it says so in the Bible. And we can trust the Bible on this matter because it’s the Word of God, and so it must be correct. Darwin's account of evolution is just a theory. A theory is an unproven hypothesis. So, there is no compelling reason to believe Darwin's theory.

  23. Consequential Fallacy Consequential fallacy: confuse the consequences of holding a belief with evidence for that belief. Darwin’s theory is false because if it were true, there would be no morality.

  24. Equivocation: to use an ambiguous term in different ways in an argument. Equivocation Nature is governed by fixed and unchangeable laws. But every law is the work of some legislator. Therefore, there is some legislator responsible for the governing of Nature.

  25. Appeal to Consensus: one appeals to consensus to establish a claim. Appeal to Consensus Most people believe that McDonals is the best restaurant in the world. McDonalds is the best restaurant in the world.

  26. Slippery slope: incorrectly reasons that the arbitrariness of marking a distinction along some continuum shows that no distinction is possible. Slippery Slope There is no agreed upon number of hair that qualifies someone as bald. Therefore, there is no difference between being bald or hairy. There is no agreed upon age that qualifies a fetus as a person. To kill an innocent person is murder. Therefore, all abortions are murders, independently of the age of the fetus.

  27. Misleading vividness: particularly vivid information is weighted more than other information in coming to a conclusion. Misleading Vividness Elections in France 2007

  28. Genetic fallacy: taking the source of a claim as evidence for or against the claim. Genetic Fallacy Tom Cruise said that there is no such thing as a chemical imbalance of the body. Tom Cruise is crazy. Therefore, there is such thing as a chemical imbalance of the body.

  29. Straw Man Straw man: misrepesenting someone’s position, arguing against it, and supposing that the actual position is defeated.

  30. Nigel: I believe that some kinds of sexual lifestyles are morally wrong. Basil: So, you’re saying it’s OK for rednecks to beat up gay people? Nigel: No, I’m not saying that at all. All people in our society should be protected from having unwanted violence inflicted upon them. I’m just saying I think their chosen lifestyles are immoral. Straw Man

  31. Straw Man Basil: What makes you think it’s OK for you to force your morality on everyone else? Nigel: I haven’t said anything about forcing my morality on anybody. All I did was give my opinion about a certain moral issue. I didn’t use any force or even the threat of force to coerce others to agree with me.

  32. Straw Man Basil: But you are saying that you don’t think gay people should have the same rights as straight people, right? Nigel: No. I think all people in a democratic society should have the same rights. That means that people should have the right to pursue lifestyles that others think are immoral. I haven’t said anything about depriving people of their rights or inflicting violence upon them. I’m only giving my opinion about the morality of their behavior. Bebee (2003) ``Good and Bad Arguments.’’

  33. Feelings: a person argues for a position by indicating that they feel a certain way. Feelings Problem: No one cares how you feel. More important problem: There is no warrant the think that your feelings about something are correlated to the truth or falsity of a proposition. Solution: Use good arguments!

More Related