E N D
1. DSM-IV-TR
6.16.2004
3. Tasks 1. Use the information about the aliens to create a classification system that uses at least 3, but no more than 5 groups (or categories).
2. Give each classified group of aliens a name and identify the characteristics that distinguish them from the other groups.
4. Review: Operationalizing mental illness
Why do we do it?
Nomenclature, consensus, communication, organization, research, treatment
5. Operationalizing mental illness Objectivity and measurability
Validity
Reliability
Must use observable phenomenon such as:
Physical symptoms (eg. heart palpitations, insomnia, etc.)
Psychological symptoms (eg. delusions, memory loss, etc.)
Mood (eg. fear, elation, anxiety, etc.)
Behavior (eg. self-mutilation, purging, etc.)
6. Have we been able to operationalize mental disorders? “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision”
Published by the American Psychiatric Association
Primarily used in the United States
Includes information only on mental illnesses
Classifies mental illnesses into different types of disorders (Mood disorders, psychotic disorders, eating disorders, etc.)
International Classification of Diseases (ICD)
Created by the World Health Organization
Used throughout the rest of the world
Includes information on both mental and physical illnesses
7. What is the DSM-IV-TR? Contains:
Diagnostic criteria
Associated features (eg. other symptoms may be present, but which are not necessary for a diagnosis)
Age of onset
Typical course of illness
Prevalence rates specific to age, gender, and ethnicity
Does not contain:
Information about etiology
Information about treatment
Cultural implications
8. Multiaxial Classification Axis I – Episodic disorders, adult onset
Axis II – Chronic, pervasive disorders, childhood disorders
Axis III – Medical conditions
Axis IV – Sociocultural stressors
Axis V – Global Assessment of Functioning
1-100 rating scale (1=bad, 100=good)
9. Global Assessment of Functioning 100 – Superior functioning in a wide range of activities, life’s problems never seem to get out of hand, no symptoms, etc.
80 – If symptoms are present, they are transient and expectable reactions to psychosocial stressors, no more than slight impairment in functioning (falling behind in schoolwork)
60 - Moderate symptoms or moderate impairment in functioning (conflicts with coworkers, some panic attacks)
40 - Some impairment in reality testing or communication or major impairment in functioning (speech is sometimes illogical or obscure, failing school, unable to hold a job,
20 - Some danger of hurting self or others or occasionally fails to maintain minimal personal hygiene or gross impairment in communication (suicide, violent, smears feces, mute, etc.)
10. Examples Axis I: Major Depressive Disorder
Alcohol Abuse
Axis II: Dependent Personality Disorder
Axis III: None
Axis IV: Unemployment
Axis V: GAF = 35 (on admission)
GAF = 57 (at discharge)
What does this tell us about this person?
What does this not tell us about this person?
11. Examples Axis I: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Social Phobia
Axis II: None
Axis III: Hypothyroidism
Axis IV: Victim of child abuse
Axis V: GAF = 65 (current)
What does this tell us about this person?
What does this not tell us about this person?
12. Assumptions of the DSM Each diagnosis is unique and distinct
One diagnosis over a lifespan
Little comorbidity (i.e. having one disorder shouldn’t affect the probability that a person would have another disorder)
Homogeneity – the disorder manifests itself the same way in everyone (all people with the disorder have similar symptoms, follow a similar course, etc.)
It should allow one to distinguish between people who do and do not have the disorder
13. How was the DSM developed? DSM-I (1952)
Created around the same time as ICD-6
Purpose: “create a classification that was a consensus of contemporary thinking”
Diagnoses were created by committees and revised by 10% of the members of the American Psychological Association
Included approximately 60 disorders
Definitions were vague, wordy descriptions
Based on psychoanalytic theory
14. How was the DSM developed? DSM-II (1968)
Created around the same time as ICD-8
Purpose: “created to promote international consensus in the realm of mental health”
Similar to DSM-I in terms of its development and the presentation of disorders
180 disorders were included
Homosexuality was included as a psychological diagnosis
15. How was the DSM developed? DSM-III:
First attempt to use research in the development of diagnostic categories, but still mostly based on clinical judgment
Definitions were changed to be more specific
Both inclusion and exclusion criteria
Homosexuality no longer considered a mental disorder
16. How was the DSM developed? DSM-IV-TR:
Attempted to systematize the way diagnostic criteria are developed
175 psychologists did literature reviews of the research on each diagnosis
Field trials were conducted that tested the reliability of the diagnoses
There is still the criticism that the diagnoses are based on the clinical judgment of a few psychologists in the individual field
Added Culture Bound Syndromes to address cultural differences in presentation of symptoms
17. Evolution of Diagnoses Example: DSM-I Borderline Personality disorder
“characterized by brief but nonreactive mood swings, both depressive and hypomanic, in the context of a chronically maladaptive personality resembling hysterical character.”
18. Evolution of Diagnoses Example: DSM-IV-TR Borderline Personality disorder
“A pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affects, and marked impulsivity beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by 5 or more of the following:
Frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment
Pattern of unstable and intense interpersonal relationships characterized by alternating extremes of idealization and devaluation
Markedly and persistently unstable self-image or sense of self
Impulsivity in at least two areas that are potentially self-damaging
Recurrent suicidal behavior, gestures, threats, or self-mutilation
Affective instability due to a marked reactivity of mood
Chronic feelings of emptiness
Inappropriate, intense anger, or difficulty controlling anger
Transient, stress-related paranoid ideation or severe dissociative symptoms
19. Evaluation of the DSM-IV-TR Does it do what it is supposed to?
Is each diagnosis unique and distinct???
Fluidity of diagnoses – transition from one diagnosis to another
25% of AN patients develop BN
Comorbidity
Two or more disorders occurring in the same individual
91% of people with Schizophrenia had at least one other diagnosis
77% of people with BN had at least one other diagnosis
75% of people with MDD had at least one other diagnosis
Disorders co-occur at rates greater than expected by chance alone
Depression and Anxiety disorders
Substance abuse and Antisocial Personality Disorder
20. Evaluation of the DSM-IV-TR Does homogeneity occur? Do all people with the disorder have similar symptoms, follow a similar course, etc?
Not necessarily. Disorders may manifest themselves differently in different people. In other words, people may have similar symptoms, but not entirely. (eg. MDD)
Also, some disorders can look completely different in different people. In other words, two people can have the same diagnosis with completely different symptoms. (eg. Conduct Disorder)
21. Evaluation of the DSM-IV-TR Can we use these definitions to distinguish between people who do and do not have the disorder?
There is still the criticism that the criteria used are based on the clinical judgment of a few psychologists in the individual field and not representative
There are still problems differentiating between normal and abnormal
Some criteria are still based on clinical judgment
22. Possible Alternatives Categorical vs. Dimensional System
Categorical
DSM uses a categorical system of diagnoses that assumes disorders are unique and discrete
Dimensional
A dimensional model suggests that disorders may be points on a continuum (or multiple continua). For example, researchers suggest that there may be an underlying factor connecting all the Internalizing disorders (depression, anxiety, etc.) and similarly, all the Externalizing disorders (antisocial personality disorder, substance use disorders, etc.).