910 likes | 1.19k Views
Symposium Panel Presenters. Vickie Robinson University of Northern IowaJane Rudden, Donna Topping, SandraHuffman Millersville UniversityToby Daniel Western Kentucky UniversityBetty Jo Simmons, Nicole FaheyLongwood University. Symposium Panel Critic/Discussant. Barbara Burch Western Kentucky University.
E N D
1. More Than a Baker’s Dozen: What Teacher Educators in Four Institutions Have Learned in Three Years of Experience with Teacher Work Samples A Symposium Presented at the Annual Meeting of AACTE 2003
New Orleans
3. Symposium Panel Critic/Discussant
Barbara Burch
Western Kentucky University
4. A Flashback to Four Years AgoBecoming Accountable for the Impact of Graduate on Students and Schools: Making Operational the Shift from Teaching to Learning A Concept Paper for Discussion for a Symposium at the
Annual Meeting of AACTE 1999
Washington, DC
5. The Renaissance Partnership Project for Improving Teacher Quality 1999 - 2004 A “temporary system” to facilitate and impact improvements in teacher preparation and quality
6. The Renaissance Partnership1999 – 2003A Small Stream That Has Deepened and Widened
7. Project Goals Become accountable for the impact of teacher candidates on P-12 student learning
Improve teacher performance in key areas and show an increase in teacher’s ability to facilitate learning of all students
8. Project Objectives Accountability Systems
Teacher Work Samples
Team Mentoring
Program Redesign
Networking Across Project Sites
Research that Links Teacher Performance to P-12 Student Learning
9. History of Renaissance TWS Development
10. History of Renaissance TWS Development
11. Year Four Work PlanTeacher Work Samples Five Year Objective:
All eleven Renaissance institutions will develop and implement the use of teacher work samples in their teacher education programs as a means of improving teaching skills and increasing the teacher’s impact on student learning
12. Year Four Work PlanTeacher Work Samples Year Four Objectives:
Institutions will expand the implementation of teacher work samples toward the inclusion of all teacher candidates
Institutions will increase the performance levels of student teachers on teacher work samples
13. St. Louis Group Pix January 2001
14. St. Louis - June 2001
24. Teacher Work Samples Produced by Eleven Project Institutions
25. Candidate Performance on Teacher Work Samples
26. Some Places Where Renaissance Partners Have Shared Successes in 2002
27. The Renaissance Teacher Work Sample Was… selected by NCATE as one of seventeen teacher candidate assessments nationwide as an exemplar that meets criteria of quality established by the Assessment Examples Project Committee
28. Teacher Work Samples “You’ve come a long way baby…but you haven’t begun to reach your full potential”
29. University of Northern Iowa
30. Scoring of Teacher Work Samples
31. Breakdown of Scores for Each Individual Indicator
39. Millersville Universityof Pennsylvania Jane F. Rudden
Donna H. Topping
Sandra J. Hoffman
40. If You Want High Performance, Start Early
What pre-student teachers need to know and do to impact P-12 student learning
41. Our Wish List Plan based on pre-assessment data
Make informed decisions “as they teach”
Evaluate pupil progress against learning goals and state standards
Interpret post-evaluative data
Reflect on the impact of their teaching on pupil learning, relevant to objectives and standards.
42. The TWS Template Facilitated Curriculum Changes @ MU Helped us organize our thinking
Guided us in time-lining the changes needed
Opened our eyes to what we were already doing that supported the direction we were going
Facilitated early changes in the program and called out the “gaps”
43. Key Components of R-TWS and How our Program Stacked Up Four Years Ago Contextual Factors
Learning Goals
Assessment Plan
Design for Instruction
Instructional Decision-Making
Analysis of Student Learning
Reflection and Self-Evaluation
N/A
Throughout program
Mainly post-assessing
Standards-based
Mainly strategy lessons
Limited to simple pre- post comparisons
Throughout program: assessment informs instruction
44. Key Components of R-TWS and How Our Program Stacks Up Today Contextual Factors
Learning Goals
Assessment Plan
Design for Instruction
Instructional Decision-Making
Analysis of Student Learning
Reflection and Self-Evaluation Frosh, Soph, Jr, Sr
Frosh, Soph, Jr, Sr
New course: required
Context, Assessment Data, Standards
Emphasis on including formative measures
New required course
Emphasis throughout program that assessment informs instruction
45. Linking Candidate Knowledge and Practice to Student Learning
Candidate Candidate use Effect on
knowledge ? of knowledge ? learning in
in practice P-12 students
46. Target Performance
Monitor student learning,
Make appropriate adjustments to instruction,
Analyze student learning,
Have a positive effect on student learning
47. Showing Credible Evidence of Student Learning
Steps taken to provide instruction and opportunity to plan, implement, and evaluate learning progress:
Taking evaluation out of the “paper/pencil” mode
48. The HURDLE: Assessment
and
Analysis
49. Convincing Them That...
assessment does not have to equal a paper and pencil test!
50. Instead...
assessment and instruction should be seamless.
51. For Example: KWL =
Semantic maps =
Concept discussions =
Writing =
Hands-on =
Drawing =
Predict/Prove =
Different ways to do pre- and post-assessment
52. For Example... Kidwatching =
Field notes =
Fist to Five =
Thumbs up, Thumbs Down, Flat Line =
Dot Voting =
Daily work =
Exit slips =
Different ways to do formative assessment
53. Analyze Data??? Me??? REREADING corpus of data again and again
RUBRICS to quantify the seemingly unquantifiable
RANGE AND VARIATION tables
VIGNETTES, richly described
BE CREATIVE and develop new ways
54. Moving Toward Shared Responsibility in the Department New assessment course
Matching of instruction/assessment terminology
Consistency from ELED100 through Student Teaching
55. SCALING IT UP... … AND OUT
56. A View From the Professional Block II Coordinator Am responsible for coordinating Professional Block II
Was not involved in R-TWS from the beginning
Am able to give a view through “new eyes”
57. Immediate Plans Spring 2003 Pilot section of 25 students
Placement in two school districts
Reconfigured field work
Context Factors, Learning Goals, Assessment Plan, Design for Instruction to be done before extended 3-week field placement through 3 extra days in the field early in the semester
Hired readers
58. Future Plans Fall 2003 Required of all Professional Block II students (approximately 140)
Reconfigured field work (based on the findings of Spring 2003)
Use of full-range of school districts
59. Unanswered Questions Effect on placements?
Training implications?
Readers?
Timeline for reading and grading by the end of the semester?
60. More Than a Baker’s DozenCritical Student Performances Western Kentucky University AACTE
January 25, 2003
New Orleans, LA
61. Presenters Tabitha “Toby” Daniel
tabitha.daniel@wku.edu
Sam Evans
sam.evans@wku.edu
62. Kentucky’s New Teacher Standards for Preparation and Certification Standard I: Designs/Plans Instruction
Standard II: Creates/Maintains Learning Climates
Standard III: Implements/Manages Instruction
Standard IV: Assesses and Communicates Learning Results
Standard V: Reflects/Evaluates Teaching/Learning
Standard VI: Collaborates with Colleagues/Parents/Others
Standard VII: Engages in Professional Development
Standard VIII: Knowledge of Content
Standard IX: Demonstrates Implementation of Technology
63. Western’s Performance Assessment System Aligned with Kentucky Teacher Standards
Based on Four Levels of Critical Performance
Uses Electronic Portfolios to record, store and manage performance data
Uses Teacher Work Samples in student teaching as evidence of candidate’s ability to facilitate learning
64. What are Critical Performances? Specific descriptions about what teacher candidates must know and be able to do at different levels of growth and development toward one or more teaching standards.
65. Four Levels of Curriculum and Evaluation of Performance Level I Knowledge/Comprehension
(classroom settings)
Level II Application
(simulated settings)
Level III Analysis/Synthesis
(controlled/limited real-life settings)
Level IV Synthesis/Evaluation
(real-life settings/student teaching)
As a student progresses through the program, continuous assessments at progressively higher levels are experienced
66. Teacher Work Samples A process that enables teacher candidates to demonstrate teaching performances directly related to planning, implementing, assessing student learning and evaluating teaching and learning a standards-based instructional unit.
67. Key Processes of Teacher Work Samples Contextual Factors
Learning Goals
Assessment Plan
Design for Instruction
Instructional Decision Making
Analysis of Student Learning
Self-Evaluation and Reflection
68. Teacher Work Samples in Student Teaching A major source of data for Level IV critical performances that provide evidence of candidates’ ability to facilitate learning of all students.
Students shall develop their abilities to connect and integrate experiences and new knowledge from all subject matter fields with what they have previously learned and build on past learning experiences to acquire new information through various media sources.
Specific descriptions about what teacher candidates must know and be able to do at different levels of growth and development toward one or more teaching standards.
69. New Teacher Standards for Preparation and Certification New Teacher Standards
70. Backward Mapping Planning Form
71. Critical Performances Profile for an Elementary Education Major
75. Electronic Portfolio Data Screen (For Each Course’s Critical Performances) Record of completion of Critical Performances aligned with Kentucky’s New Teacher Standards that includes:
Performance scores
Performance exhibits
Time of completion
Number of attempts toward completion (being added)
77. Enhancing Critical Performances Faculty development, discussion, and adoption of Alignment Maps
Filling “gaps” on Maps
Re-evaluating alignment and purpose of existing critical performances
Obtaining faculty feedback and student data to begin establishing reliability and validity
78. Western’s Progress on Performance Assessments Teacher Work Sample implemented
Most critical performances identified
Electronic portfolio operational
Course/experience alignment in process
79. Experiences With Teacher Work Sampleat Longwood: What We Have Learned From Practice by
Betty Jo Simmons
80. Presentation Overview What / Where is Longwood?
What is the program like?
How is Teacher Work Sample Used?
How do teacher candidates view TWS?
What has been learned from students?
Presentation by Nicole Fahey from Longwood
Student teacher survey
81. Candidates for the Teaching Profession Also Take:
Practicum I (Freshman)
Practicum II (Sophomore)
Partnership Program (Junior)
Student Teaching (Senior)
84. Presently Candidates for the Teaching Profession Are Expected to Complete
85. What We Are Learning from Practice: Good and Not Good Partnership School Feedback
The Voice of TWS: Presentation from Nicole Fahey, Longwood Student
Student Teaching Feedback
The TWS Survey from Fall 2002
86. What Is Good? TWS is terrific in the partnership semester
Assessment data is important
Contextual information is essential
TWS leads to improved teaching strategies
87. What Is Not So Good? The amount of work required
Doing two TWS during student teaching
Not having enough trained mentoring during student teaching
Not having enough time to implement TWS fully during student teaching
88. Expectations for the Future Use one TWS during partnership and only one during student teaching
Continue to provide training; adequacy of training cannot be taken for granted
Emphasize TWS as teaching processes, not just an assignment/product
Continue to capitalize upon TWS as the best vehicle for enhancing our NCATE model of “teachers as reflective leaders”
89. TWS: The Longwood Story Once upon a time, we were skeptics
Today we are vocal TWS advocates
It does promote best practice, reflection and accountability!!!!!
90. Reflections on Four Years Since Washington, DC 1999 Barbara Burch, Provost
Western Kentucky University
91. Discussion Questions What do you think is the most important contribution of teacher work samples?
What have you found to be the greatest challenge in implementing teacher work samples?
What would you advise other teacher educators who are considering introducing teacher work samples as performance assessments for teacher candidates?