1 / 28

A PRESENTATION/DISCUSSION WITH THE ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ON ASSESSMENT/ACCOUNTABILITY

A PRESENTATION/DISCUSSION WITH THE ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ON ASSESSMENT/ACCOUNTABILITY MAY 23, 2002. MEETINGS OF THE TEST ADVISORY COMMITTEE. February 23, 2001 March 7, 2001 September 20, 2001 February 11, 2002 April 29, 2002. TEST ADVISORY COMMITTEE’S ADOPTED

abdalla
Download Presentation

A PRESENTATION/DISCUSSION WITH THE ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ON ASSESSMENT/ACCOUNTABILITY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A PRESENTATION/DISCUSSION WITH THE ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ON ASSESSMENT/ACCOUNTABILITY MAY 23, 2002

  2. MEETINGS OF THE TEST ADVISORY COMMITTEE • February 23, 2001 • March 7, 2001 • September 20, 2001 • February 11, 2002 • April 29, 2002

  3. TEST ADVISORY COMMITTEE’S ADOPTED PRINCIPLES OF A REVISED STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM • Provide for long-term stability while allowing for refinements. • Use a combination of criterion- and norm-referenced assessments. (CRT and NRT) • Align CRTs with Alabama Courses of Study. • Design CRTs in Grades 3-8 to reflect NAEP-type rigor, format, and reporting. • Design assessments that are developmentally appropriate to emphasize application of knowledge as well as content recall. • Provide assessment data in a timely manner and in easy-to-understand formats that guide instruction and inform parents and citizens. • Balance testing needs with instructional delivery time.

  4. THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001 Assessments Sec. 1111(b)(3), page 25. “…yearly student academic assessments that include, at a minimum, academic assessments in mathematics, reading or language arts, and science that will be used as the primary means of determining the yearly performance of the State and of each local educational agency and school in the State in enabling all children to meet the State’s challenging student academic achievement standards.” Sec. 1111(b)(3), pages 25 - 26. “Such assessments shall be the same academic assessments used to measure the achievement of all children; be aligned with the State’s challenging academic content and student academic achievement standards.” Special Education Sec. 1111(b)(2), page 22. “Adequate yearly progress shall be defined by the State in such a manner that applies the same high standards of academic achievement to all public elementary school and secondary school students in the State; … includes separate measurable annual objectives for . . . the achievement of all public elementary school and secondary school students . . . economically disadvantaged students; students from major racial and ethnic groups; students with disabilities; and students with limited English proficiency.”

  5. ASSESSMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDED TIMELINE Given sufficient staff and resources, the Test Advisory Committee recommends the following timeline for implementation of the new Student Assessment Program. • Fall 2003 - Grades K, 1, and 2 reading assessments (CRT) • 2003-2004 - Grades 4, 6, and 8 reading/language arts and mathematics assessments (CRT) • 2003-2004 - Grade 10 writing assessment (CRT) • 2004-2005 - Grades 3, 5, and 7 reading/language arts and mathematics assessments (CRT) • 2005-2006 - Grades K, 1, and 2 mathematics assessments (CRT) • 2006-2007 - Grades 5 and 7 science assessments (CRT) • 2007-2008 - Grade 6 social studies assessment (CRT)

  6. ASSESSMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDED ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS The Test Advisory Committee recommends the following be adopted as the achievement level policy definitions for reporting academic achievement results for the criterion-referenced assessments. These policy definitions will later be used in writing academic achievement descriptors, narrative descriptions of student performance at each achievement level. These will be the common policy definitions used in developing descriptions of what students know and can do in specific grades/subjects. Level I Does not meet academic content standards Level II Partially meets academic content standards Level III Meets academic content standards Level IV Exceeds academic content standards

  7. TRENDS IN SREB STATE TESTING PROGRAMS What is happening in testing in SREB states: • Readiness and classroom-based tests (K-2) • End-of-grade criterion-referenced tests (3-8) • Periodic writing tests • Periodic norm-referenced testing • State NAEP tests at Grades 4 and 8 • College entrance and Advanced Placement testing (Plan and Explore programs by ACT) • High school testing—beyond minimum competency • Show test samples to the public—what students must know to pass the tests Southern Regional Education Board

  8. TEST ADVISORY COMMITTEE’S ADOPTED PRINCIPLES OF A REVISED ACADEMIC ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM • Focus on improving student achievement for all students and include multiple criteria to determine improvement. • Provide for long-term continuity and stability, allowing for refinements. • Provide useful information about progress of all students that has meaning for all involved and interested parties. • Report on improvements made by schools and school systems as students achieve at higher levels.

  9. TEST ADVISORY COMMITTEE’S ADOPTED PRINCIPLES OF A REVISED ACADEMIC ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM (Continued) • Provide rewards for school and school system improvements. • Identify schools and school systems with large numbers of low-achieving students and provide assistance. • Sanction schools and school systems that do not demonstrate adequate progress. • Disaggregate student data to provide information that will lead to narrowing and ultimately closing any achievement gaps among student groups. • Ensure assessment reporting guides improve instruction, increase student achievement, create better awareness of parents and policymakers, and encourage schools and educators to learn from one another.

  10. NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND Accountability Section 1111(b)(2), pages 21-22. “ . . . a single, statewide State accountability system . . . based on the academic standards and academic assessments . . . shall take into account the achievement of all public elementary school and secondary school students.”

  11. SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY— BASIC ELEMENTS What are the basic elements of a sound state approach to accountability? • Standards • Testing • Professional development • Reporting • Assistance, rewards, and sanctions Southern Regional Education Board

  12. TESTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY— ESSENTIAL PRINCIPLES What principles are key in school accountability? • Long-term process that evolves including adjustments, refinements, and improvements • Tightly linked to standards • Focus on improvement • Stability • Accurate, credible, and easy to understand • Moves beyond minimums Southern Regional Education Board

  13. SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY What criteria are SREB states using for school accountability? • Student achievement—balance of reaching performance standards and making improvement • Dropout rates • Attendance • Kinds of courses students are taking • Levels of performance and rewards • Other (to be identified for Alabama) Southern Regional Education Board

  14. ALABAMA ACCOUNTABILITY • Make necessary adjustments—refinements will be necessary • Maintain stability • Develop a comprehensive long-range plan • Raise expectations in a planned cycle over a period of years • Phase in criterion-referenced testing, Grades 3-8 • Reduce unnecessary testing • Continue support for schools and teachers––assistance and professional development Southern Regional Education Board

  15. ALABAMA STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM2002-2003 K-2 DIBELS (Reading)—Pilot in selected schools 3 New NRT (Reading, Language, & Mathematics) School Ability Test Alabama Alternate Assessment 4 New NRT (Reading, Language, & Mathematics) School Ability Test Alabama Alternate Assessment 5 New NRT (Reading, Language, Mathematics & Science) School Ability Test Alabama Direct Assessment of Writing: Grade Five Alabama Alternate Assessment 6 New NRT (Reading, Language, Mathematics & Social Studies) School Ability Test Alabama Alternate Assessment 7 New NRT (Reading, Language, Mathematics & Science) School Ability Test Alabama Direct Assessment of Writing: Grade Seven Alabama Alternate Assessment

  16. ALABAMA STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM2002-2003(Continued) 8 New NRT (Reading, Language, & Mathematics) School Ability Test Alabama Alternate Assessment 10 Pre-Graduation Examination (Grade 11 Content) Alabama Direct Assessment of Writing: Grade Ten (Pilot in selected schools) 11-12 Alabama High School Graduation Exam Alabama Occupational Portfolio Assessment Alabama Alternate Assessment

  17. ALABAMA STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM2003-2004 K-2 DIBELS (Reading) Alabama Alternate Assessment 3 NRT (Reading, Language, & Mathematics) School Ability Test Alabama Alternate Assessment 4 New CRT/NRT (Reading, Language, & Mathematics)* School Ability Test Alabama Alternate Assessment 5 NRT (Reading, Language, Mathematics & Science) School Ability Test Alabama Direct Assessment of Writing: Grade Five Alabama Alternate Assessment 6 New CRT/NRT (Reading, Language, & Mathematics)* NRT (Social Studies) School Ability Test Alabama Alternate Assessment 7 NRT (Reading, Language, Mathematics & Science) School Ability Test Alabama Direct Assessment of Writing: Grade Seven Alabama Alternate Assessment

  18. ALABAMA STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM2003-2004(Continued) 8 New CRT/NRT (Reading, Language, & Mathematics)* School Ability Test Alabama Alternate Assessment 10 Alabama Direct Assessment of Writing: Grade Ten Pre-Graduation Examination (Grade 11 Content) Alabama Alternate Assessment 11-12 Alabama High School Graduation Exam Alabama Occupational Portfolio Assessment Alabama Alternate Assessment *Pilot in selected schools fall 2003. Statewide administration spring 2004.

  19. INTERIM ACCOUNTABILITY/accountability • June 27, 2002—Release results of Spring 2002 assessments, focusing on the current seven (7) Alert 3 schools and others showing improvement • August 22, 2002—Release disaggregated results of Spring 2002 assessments for all grades in all schools in all school systems, plus a statewide report • February 27, 2003—Release revised Report Cards for each school, school system, and the state of Alabama

  20. INTERIM ACCOUNTABILITY/accountability • August 22, 2002—Identify “Academically Struggling Schools” • Reconstitute SDE Teams—Provide targeted assistance to Academically Struggling Schools • All Current Alert 3 schools must improve or stay in intervention—Other Alert and Caution schools may be identified as Academically Struggling and receive assistance • Confirm 90% passing rate on AHSGE—In order to improve from Alert or Caution, high schools must have 90% pass Reading and Language subjects of AHSGE (2003 will expand to Reading, Language, Math, and Science) • Refocus Mega Conference—The statewide Mega Conference on July 22-25, 2003, will focus on “Closing the Achievement Gap” and will include all applicable SDE sections, local school system educators, and parents

  21. INTERIM ACCOUNTABILITY/accountability Create a statewide Special Education Committee to focus on: • No Child Left Behind • Reauthorization of I.D.E.A. • Current Alabama Administrative Code regulations, including assessments/ • accountability/occupational diploma/ • AHSGE

  22. REPORT OF THE SOCIAL STUDIES STANDARD-SETTING COMMITTEE Minimally Passing: A minimally passing student should demonstrate sufficient mastery of fundamental content in tenth and eleventh grade U. S. History that students are required to pass in order to receive a high school diploma. Number of Teachers Per Ethnic Group: White 18 Black 7 Number of Teachers Per State Board District: District 1 3 District 2 3 District 3 3 District 4 3 District 5 4 District 6 3 District 7 3 District 8 3 Number of Teachers By Sex: Male 9 Female 16 Number of Special Education/ Regular Classroom Teachers: Special Education 2 Regular Classroom 23

  23. PASSING SCORES FOR THE ALABAMA HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION EXAM (AHSGE) FOR SOCIAL STUDIES Scaled Percent Passing Percent Passing Percent Passing ScoreGrade 11 (2002)Grade 10 (2001)Grade 10 (2002) 509 68.7 50.49 55.08 Raw scores for passing range from 49 to 56 (average of 52) depending on the form. Scaled score ranges from 0 to 999. CLASS OF '03 OR CLASS OF '04 ?

More Related