330 likes | 437 Views
?A portfolio is a purposeful collection of student work that demonstrates effort, progress, or achievement...(Barrett, 1999, p.1)"An electronic portfolio uses multimediatechnology to collect and organize artifacts in various media (audio, video, graphics, text) (Barrett, 1999). . Portfolios.
E N D
1. Maximizing the Use
of Portfolios
for Students and Institutions
2. “A portfolio is a purposeful collection of
student work that demonstrates effort,
progress, or achievement...(Barrett, 1999, p.1)”
An electronic portfolio uses multimedia
technology to collect and organize artifacts in
various media (audio, video, graphics, text)
(Barrett, 1999). Portfolios Arter and Spandel (1992) define
with hypermedia links” that connect that evidence to the appropriate standards Arter and Spandel (1992) define
with hypermedia links” that connect that evidence to the appropriate standards
3. Portfolios “Based on constructivism, students may be
expected to take responsibility for selecting
artifacts, making connections to standards,
and interpreting their own learning
(Wilhelm et al., 2006, p. 412).”
4. Writing collection
Working
Electronic
Presentation
Professional Names of Portfolios
5. Types of Portfolios Resource portfolio helps students collect and organize their work.
Presentation portfolio allows students to demonstrate competencies they have met and showcase their work for professional purposes.
Directed Response portfolio assists in providing students and programs with evaluative feedback.
6. Uses of Portfolios Foster critical, creative, and reflective thinking
Demonstrate competencies
Ongoing professional development
Marketing tool
Show growth over time
Trace the evolution of one or more projects
7. Uses of Portfolios Document achievement for alternative coursework
Assist with course placement
Review curriculum or instruction
Large-scale assessment
Program evaluation
8. Institution Needs Student Use collect evidence needed to demonstrate competencies and learning objectivescollect evidence needed to demonstrate competencies and learning objectives
9. Student Needs Journal
Professional development plan
Marketing tool
10. Institution Needs Track assessments
Collect evidence needed to demonstrate competencies and learning objectives
11. Student vs. Institution
12. Teaching Standards The National Council for Accreditation of
Teacher Education (NCATE) and state
accrediting boards have standards that
“form an ideal framework for organizing
an electronic portfolio” (Barrett, 1999, p. 3).
13. E-portfolio Experience Watson School of Education
Use TaskSteam for past 5 years
As of the fall of 2005, all teacher education students are required to develop an e-portfolio
We collect data on views and perceptions of e-portfolio use
14. Suggested Practice Three principles
Elicit students’ perspectives and determining their e-portfolio needs
Incorporate faculty views
Align portfolio requirements with other program assessment and evaluation responsibilities.
15. Survey Students
Every semester we collect data on views and perceptions of the e-portfolio
Faculty
Recently started collecting data on TaskStream and portfolio use.
16. Student Perspectives 96% of students value their experiences using e-portfolios as a professional development plan
17. Most Common Activities Lesson plan writing
Communication
Developing survey template and assessment tools
18. Communication Faculty
Internship supervisors
Partnership teachers
Peers
19. Survey template & Assessment tool
20. Assessment Results
21. Student Feedback It helps me stay organized and keep track of work. I can keep my lesson plans in one place.
I can communicate with other interns and ask questions.
22. Help students develop skills (lesson plans, rubrics, etc.)
Facilitate reflection and discussion
Project sharing among students
Peer review
Faculty Views (project sharing with classmates, to post reflection papers, peer review).
(project sharing with classmates, to post reflection papers, peer review).
23. Align the portfolio with teacher education standards
Accommodate program evaluation requirements and students’ interests through the same e-portfolio.
Performance Evaluation Scale
Instrument Alignment
24. Programs can collect evidence from students’ artifacts for accreditation and evaluation.
25. As the evaluation is aligned with standards, it becomes easier to address needs expressed in the program evaluation results
Expand or add components to target desired skills and competencies.
26. Instrument Alignment Example: if evaluation results show that students need more developed skills in the area of lesson planning, then lesson planning skills can be reinforced in the e-portfolio.
27. Instrument Alignment Students’ work aligned with teaching standards and program evaluation tools can serve institutions and pupils.
28. Faculty and students can work as a coalition helping each other document learning, fostering reflection and growth and providing evidence for program effectiveness.
29. Reconciling Students and Institutions Needs Sustained usage of e-portfolios
Integration in students, faculty and programs’ daily practices
31. Maximizing Use An educational tool:
Learning
Professional development
Marketing tool
Assessment for students, faculty, and programs
32. Discussion Is your institution using e-portfolios?
How are e-portfolios being used?
33. Arter, J., & Spandel, V. (1992). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11, 36-44.
Barrett, H. C. (1999). Electronic teaching portfolios. In J. Price et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 1999 (pp. 1029-1034). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Retrieved December 27, 2007, from: http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/site99.html
Wilhelm, L., Puckett, K., Beisser, S., Wishart, W., Merideth, E., & Sivakumaran, T. (2006). Lessons learned from the implementation of electronic portfolios at three universities. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 50 (4), 62-82. References