1 / 32

A Laboratory Test of the Equivalence Principle as Prolog to a Spaceborne Experiment

A Laboratory Test of the Equivalence Principle as Prolog to a Spaceborne Experiment. Robert D. Reasenberg and James D. Phillips Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Motivation for Testing the Equivalence Principle.

abiola
Download Presentation

A Laboratory Test of the Equivalence Principle as Prolog to a Spaceborne Experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Laboratory Test of the Equivalence Principle as Prolog to a Spaceborne Experiment Robert D. Reasenberg and James D. Phillips Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  2. Motivation forTesting the Equivalence Principle can be found at this conference. • Central to the present accepted theory of gravity. • Some theorists argue it is the place to look for a breakdown of general relativity. • The evidence that leads to dark energy may be telling us that we need a new gravity theory. • Attempts to create a quantum theory of gravity show a failure of the equivalence principle. • Gravity is the least well tested force. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  3. POEM Gen-I:Chamber Opticsand Slide Key Technologies: Laser gauge; Capacitance gauge; Motion system. Gen-I, Gen-II, Gen-III, ?? Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  4. Gen-I TMA Φ = 44.5 mm h = 36.5 mm Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  5. A Vacuum Chamber in Free Fall? • Advantages • No mechanisms or motors in vacuum or power shafts passing through the wall to operate on each toss, at high speed and at sub-mm accuracy. • Laser gauge and capacitance gauge components must move with the TMA. • Chamber is relatively small. • Disadvantages • Massive object (ca. 50 kg) moves at up to 5 m/s, but must have low vibration level and rapid change of direction. • A vacuum pump must ride with chamber. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  6. A B B A Second Pair of TMA, Gen-II • Cancellation of gravity gradient. • Δg / g = 1.6 10-7 (for Δh = 0.5 m) • Local sources vary. • Requires absolute distance. • dg/dz = 3 10-7 g / m. • TMA is 30% test mass. • Science goal (Gen-III): σ (Δg) / g = 5 × 10-14 • Measurement goal = 1.5 10-14 => Δh-error < 0.05 μm. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  7. Interchanges, Gen-III • Gen-III goal: σ (Δg) / g = 5 × 10-14 • Requires control of systematic error. • Gen-III introduces interchanges to cancel systematic errors. • Robotic left-right. • Perhaps every 10 minutes. • Manual top-bottom. • Requires braking vacuum => separate runs 1 or 2 days apart. • Manual interchange of test substance between TMA. • One interchange per experiment – if needed. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  8. Principal Systematic Error Sources, I • Earth’s gravity gradient. • Absolute distance measurement. • Top-bottom interchange. • Second pair of TMA. • Coriolis force and transverse velocity. • Capacitance gauge measures velocity. • Air slide reduces vibration => reduced transverse velocity. • Gravity gradient due to local mass (parked cars). • Second pair of TMA. • Frequent left-right interchanges of TMA. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  9. Principal Systematic Error Sources, II • Rotation of TMA around horizontal axis. • Measured with capacitance gauge and calibrated by inducing fast rotation with high voltage on capacitance gauge electrodes. • Misalignment of measurement beam WRT cavity. • Measure beam position. • Measured TMA position with capacitance gauge. • Measure effect by exaggerated beam tilt. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  10. Why the Tracking Frequency Laser Gauge?No other laser gauge will do. • When we started working on POINTS, there was no adequate laser gauge. • We needed 2 pm in 1 minute to 1 hour. • We found only one serious contender, the standard heterodyne gauge. • For POEM, we need 1 pm in 1 s. • We would like 0.1 pm in 1 s! • We also need absolute distance to 0.01 μm (differential, averaged over an experiment) Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  11. ~ fm Stabilized Laser Frequency Shifter (ADM) Phase Modulator L VCO VFS Frequency Counter Interferometer (Hopping) Controller Analog Output TFG Block DiagramClassic Realization Tracking Frequency laser Gauge: loop closed by Pound-Drever-Hall locking. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  12. 4 TFG Advantages • Intrinsically free of the cyclic bias characteristic of heterodyne laser gauges. • Able to operate in a cavity for increased sensitivity. • Absolute distance available at little additional cost. • Able to suppress polarization errors (nm scale or much smaller with a cat’s eye) and, when used in a cavity, to suppress alignment errors. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  13. TFG Precision • Shot noise limit, HeNe power of 1 μW, 1 s. • Michelson intrinsic precision: 0.06 pm. • Similar for heterodyne gauge. • Current TFG limitation is “technical noise.” • σ < 10 pm on 0.1 s samples. (12/02) . Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  14. TFG Absolute Distance • Fringe spacing in optical frequency,Φ = c/(2L). • Measure Φ, get L with no ambiguity length. • Measure optical frequency before and after a hop of K fringes to get ΔF. K>1 increases precision. • L = K c / (2 ΔF) • Precision degraded by η = ΔF / F. • Either use two lasers to read simultaneously or hop fast to avoid errors due to fluctuating path. • TFG does hop fast (50 kHz demonstrated), unlike most narrow-linewidth laser systems. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  15. How Large Can η Be? • Using HeNe & an ADM, 500 MHz / 470 THz = 10-6. • Using a semiconductor laser, the frequency counter limit yields 2 GHz / 200 THz = 10-5. • This yields wave count => connect to phase measurement. • Using a series of markers. • Assume the DFB laser we are using. • 60 GHz / 200 THz = 3 10-4. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  16. Coriolis • Coriolis acceleration. • Vertical Coriolis acceleration: ac = 2 ve-w|ω| cos(latitude). • Earth rotation: |ω| = 7.292 10-5 /s. • Require ve-w be measured to 33 nm/s [bias < 0.25 nm/s]. • Add capacitance gauge. • Collaboration with W. Hill (Rowland Institute at Harvard). • 5 degrees of freedom for each of 4 TMA. • TMA free floating and minimal drive signal. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  17. + + - - ~ POEM Capacitance Gauges Collaboration with Winfield Hill, Rowland Institute at Harvard Vacuum TMA Correlator s/w in PC f1, f2, …, f5 ADC 24 bit 100 kHz Out Estimates of 5 positions (x, y: top and bottom & z) per TMA, at 1 kHz Cal. f1 Moving Static Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  18. Drive: 0.1 V rms, 10 – 20 kHz Sensitivity: < 8 nm @ 1 s. Electrode gaps: 1 mm (nominal) Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  19. Motion System • Slide (commercial now). • Follow nominal trajectory. • Low vibration motion. • Torsion bar bouncer. • Store and return energy. • Do no harm. (Cause no shock.) • Horizontal cable hit by moving system. • Soft onset of force on moving system, from geometry. • Effective mass of cable, 0.05 kg (chamber, 40 kg). Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  20. Torsion Bar Bouncer • Torsion bar with lever holds each end of cable. • Bar working size, 74 x 1 inch. • 4340 steel, heat treated. (Racing car industry) • Made possible by moving-chamber approach • Internal modes of torsion bar (cf. coil springs). • F > 1 kHz. • Small moment of inertia (vs Mchamber Rlever2). • Status: working well – alone and with motor. • Replaces system with ¼ inch cable running over pulleys. This had too much friction. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  21. Present Slide • Anorad slide including linear motor, Renishaw gauge, and track rollers running on small rails. • TMA must be launched vertically. • Vibration at micron level (mostly 100 – 200 Hz). • Transverse velocity  3 mm / s • Long-standing plan: Use air-bearing slide. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  22. Laser Gauge : Progress & Status • HeNe TFG works in moving system. • Two-channel frequency counter built. • Contiguous measurements – no dead time. • Precise synchronization. (Jim MacArthur, Harvard-Physics Electronics Shop) • Developing TFG using semiconductor lasers. • DFB lasers at 1550 nm communications band. • Lasers locked to reference cavity. • Improved electronics being developed by contractor. • On path to space-based application. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  23. Capacitance Gauge: Progress & Status • Architecture long established. • Electrode assemblies in hand – preliminary version. • All electronic components designed and in various stages of fabrication at Rowland Institute. • Packaging to be finalized soon. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  24. Motion System: Progress & Status • Torsion-bar bouncer has high mechanical efficiency. • Motor servo can be (and has been) tuned less aggressively =>lower noise yet still follows trajectory to 10s of μm. • Vibration measured in present slide – too high. • Next step, air-bearing slide to replace wheels and track (as long planned). • Use granite beam and porous graphite bearings. • Preliminary designs completed – no serious problems. • Found vendors: meet requirements at reasonable price. • Have hardware to make clean dry compressed air. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  25. POEM Summary • The SAO Principle of Equivalence Measurement is a Galilean test of the WEP. • The goal for the Gen-III version of the experiment is σ (Δg) / g = 5 × 10-14 for several pairs of substances. • All Gen-I components are working and being tuned or modified for better performance; some components, originally described as part of Gen-II, are started. • Capacitance gauge (nearly finished). • Air slide (preliminary design). • The measurement system is being designed both for the control of systematic error and, where applicable, to be easily translated to be space-based. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  26. More Information • www.cfa.harvard.edu/poem • reasenberg@cfa.harvard.edu • 617-495-7108 • jphillips@cfa.harvard.edu • 617-495-7360 Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  27. Principal Approaches Today • Torsion balance tests. • Sensitive to sun's gravity or horizontal component of earth's gravity. Also, other distant matter. • Best results: σ (Δg) / g = 4 × 10-13. • Adelberger et al. 2001. (confusion about factor of 3) • Galilean tests (dropping). • Sensitive to full vertical gravity of earth. • Niebauer et al. (Faller) 1987, σ (Δg) / g = 5 × 10-10. • Best results: σ (Δg) / g = 10-10 (Dittus 2001, 109 m tower, σ (Δg) / g = 10-12, projected). • Works (better) in space: our long-term goal. • POEM (σ (Δg) / g = 5 × 10-14, projected) Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  28. Heterodyne Gauge • Cyclic bias due to polarization leakage. • Multiple averaging reduces bias to 0.15 pm in few min. [Gursel, SPIE 2200, pp. 27-34, 1994]. • Abandoned by SIM in favor of concentric beams. • Variant without polarization: 3 pm in 1 sec. [Gursel, priv. comm. 2002]. • Absolute distance possible. • Requires either a second laser or a tunable laser. • Complexity. • Not able to operate in a cavity. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  29. Classic TFG Performance Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  30. POEM Smooth Motion Problem • Coriolis acceleration. • Require ve-w be measured to 33 nm/s [bias < 0.25 nm/s]. • Capacitance gauge. • Dynamic range limit: 4 104. (engineering judgment) • Maximum transverse velocity for TMA. • (0.25 nm/s) (4 104) = 0.01 mm/s • Transverse velocity limit. • Vvertical = 5 m/s => slope error < 2 10-6. hard but possible Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  31. Straight Rails for Air Slide • Keeping the slope error < 2 10-6 is well within the capability of today’s optical fabrication techniques. • Could do better, even if we needed general non-flat shape. $(0.3 – 3) 105 • It is just within the capability of the precision granite industry. • $(4 - 7) 103 • Active system could compensate for irregular surface of rails, if needed. • E.g., PZT at each bearing and (averaged) inertial sensors. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

  32. Motion System, Cont. • Identified replacement motor controller that will permit still lower noise level. • Eliminates 5 μm encoder discretization. • More flexible and transparent control model. • Not known to be needed. Reasenberg & Phillips Quantum to Cosmos

More Related