240 likes | 493 Views
Phenylephrine Citizen Petition Statistical Evaluation of Effectiveness Submissions. Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting Silver Spring, Maryland December 14, 2007 Stan Lin, PhD Division of Biometrics 4/OB/OTS. PEH 10 mg Effectiveness. Submissions Reviewed CP Meta-Analysis,
E N D
PhenylephrineCitizen PetitionStatistical Evaluation of Effectiveness Submissions Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting Silver Spring, Maryland December 14, 2007 Stan Lin, PhD Division of Biometrics 4/OB/OTS
PEH 10 mg Effectiveness • Submissions Reviewed • CP Meta-Analysis, 8 studies; previously reviewed by FDA advisory review panel • CHPA Meta-Analysis, 7 of the 8 studies included in the CP meta-analysis
PEH 10 mg Effectiveness • Submissions Reviewed • Report EMC140, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare: 3 previously unpublished studies conducted between 1967 and 1983 • Clinical study conducted by Schering-Plough in 2006
Brief History • In 1976, the FDA published an ANPR in which the Advisory Review Panel on OTC Cold, Cough, Allergy, Bronchodilator, and Antiasthmatic Products proposed phenylephrine (PEH) be classified as GRASE. • The Panel reviewed a total of 13 studies and concluded that 7 of the studies demonstrated PEH, 10 mg, to be effective in clearing the nasal airway (i.e., reducing nasal airway resistance,NAR). The other 6 studies did not show PEH to be effective at reducing nasal airway resistance.
CP Meta-Analysis • The citizen petition (CP) was based on a meta-analysis of some of the studies previously reviewed by the 1976 advisory panel. However, the clinical endpoint used for the meta-analysis is the maximal reduction in nasal airway resistance measured periodically during the first two hours after administration of a single dose of phenylephrine hydrochloride (PEH) 10 mg.
CP Meta-Analysis • Use of maximal reduction in nasal airway resistance is problematic • This endpoint was not mentioned in the studies reviewed by the panel, so • It was not the basis for the original design or analysis of the studies included in the meta-analysis. • May obscure differences throughout dosing interval.
CP Meta-Analysis • This new endpoint is not appropriate to use for re-assessment of the efficacy of 10 mg PEH. • E.g., Trials might be designed differently
Meta-Analysis • "All meta-analysis is post-facto. You only do it if you know you're going to win." –Bob Temple, Reg Briefing, 3/07 • Always a post-hoc re-assembly or re-analysis of already existing data. • Hypothesis formulating, but considered alone rarely provides confirmatory evidence (or lack of) without new data. • One issue of meta-analysis is the combinability of the results of studies • Data summarized should be sufficiently homogeneous.
CHPA Meta-Analysis • 7 studies: Crossover design. • Primary Endpoint: Reduction in NAR in 0-60 minutes.
CHPA Meta-Analysis • Evidence exists for treatment by study interaction at the different time points where NAR was measured. This indicates heterogeneity in the studies and/or their outcomes and potentially limits the poolability of data across the studies. • Note: Since these studies were included in the CP meta-analysis, heterogeneity affects that meta-analysis as well.
CHPA Meta-Analysis • Of the 4 studies which showed efficacy of 10 mg PEH, 2 were conducted at the same site, the Elizabeth Biochemical Laboratory. • The same laboratory also studied efficacy of other doses of PEH.
CHPA Meta-Analysis • All Elizabeth studies showed relatively stronger efficacy whatever dose was studied. Averaging these studies with other studies would mask a finding of no effect from the other studies. • With limited replication of positive findings from other sites, the lack of multicenter representation of the small studies at the Elizabeth Biochemical Laboratory limit the generalizability of its results.
Summary: CP and CHPA Meta-Analyses • Neither analysis is conclusive for the effectiveness of PEH 10 mg. • The CP meta-analysis generates new hypothesis with the maximum reduction in NAR as endpoint of effectiveness. • Its effect discrimination properties. • New studies needed on the maximal reduction of NAR over time.
Other Submissions • Neither the Schering-Plough study nor the Wyeth Report, EMC 140, contributes useful data on NAR for PEH 10 mg (basis of CP) • EMC 140: 1) AHR-G1A, Single blind, no Pbo Crtl, 8 subjects on PEH 10 mg 2) Study 7032, 8 subjects, 8-way crossover, no difference from placebo 3) AHR-4010-3, 1 of 6 centers measured NAR, 12 subjects. Showed significant difference in total NAR 30-180 min (not clearly explained how) • SP: 3-way crossover, single-center, SAR patients 6 hrs in chamber, 38/39 completed. No difference from pbo in primary endpoint of symptom scores. (NAR not measured)
Existing wording of the FR dated 8/23/94: phenylephrine HCl • On page 43410 under section (1), Oral, nasal decongestants – (i) For products containing phenylephrine hydrochloride identified in 341.20 (a) (1) is as follows: "Adults and children 12 years of age and over: 10 mg every 4 hours not to exceed 60 mg in 24 hours. Children 6 to under 12 years of age: 5 mg every 4 hours not to exceed 30 mg in 24 hours. Children 2 to under 6 years of age: 2.5 mg every 4 hours not to exceed 15 mg in 24 hours. Children under 2 years of age: consult a doctor." • Bitartrate listed 8/1/2006
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Phenylephrine: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisPublished Online, 30 January 2007, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1H679.The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 381-390. DOI 10.1345/aph.1H679 "Based on 8 unpublished studies that included 138 patients, phenylephrine 10 mg did not affect NAR more than placebo; the mean maximal difference in relative change from baselinebetween phenylephrine and placebo was 10.1%, [95% confidence interval, (-3.8%, 23.9%)]. Eight unpublished studies on phenylephrine 25 mg showed a significant reduction of maximal NAR compared with placebo of 27.6% (95% CI 17.5% to 37.7%)."