260 likes | 390 Views
1 09/10/13. Lynda L Hoffman Waterways Division Manager. Stormwater Utility FY14 CIP Status FY15 to FY19 CIP Planning KCIC T&I Committee September 10, 2013. SW Blvd flooding from Turkey Creek. 1951 Flood. Mark Young Stormwater Division Manager. Mission Lake Charlotte Street.
E N D
1 09/10/13 Lynda L Hoffman Waterways Division Manager Stormwater Utility FY14 CIP Status FY15 to FY19 CIP Planning KCIC T&I Committee September 10, 2013 SW Blvd flooding from Turkey Creek 1951 Flood Mark Young Stormwater Division Manager Mission Lake Charlotte Street Gardner Avenue Stormwater
2 09/10/13 • Stormwater Utility CIP Projects • Reasons to complete Stormwater Capital Improvement Projects: • flood reduction / flow management • runoff reduction • water quality management • to extend / continue the life of existing assets • Stormwater service fees can only be used for maintenance and planning. • Funding sources for CIP are predominately PIAC and other sources such as TIFF, ARRA, SRF. • Projects funded typically are flood reduction. We now attempt to include runoff reduction as a response to flood reduction requests. • Excessive / uncontrolled flow disrupts commerce and transportation. • Westport • Gardner Ave • Universal Development • Crossroads / Freighthouse • Blue river • Brush Creek • Indian Creek • Gooseneck Creek
3 09/10/13 • Stormwater Utility CIP Projects • Watershed Studies / KC One identified $2 Billion in improvements that would be needed to meet the level of service provided by the APWA design standards. • This work was not fully integrated with the work associated with the Overflow Control Program conducted to address combined sewer overflow, which affect 68 square miles of the City’s 318 square Miles. (The core of the city). • Most of the $2 Billion is needed to manage stormwateris in the core of the City. • We need to make significant improvements in stormwater management in the areas where runoff from frequent storms disrupts commerce. The cost to provide the level of service required by the APWA standards is too high in the areas most well-known for flooding. We can significantly improve the level of service for a much more reasonable cost. • Gardner Avenue is an example. Gardner just west of Chouteau will still flood in major events, but frequent events do not disrupt access to the area now. Flooding at Gardner and Monroe still needs to be addressed.
4 09/10/13 • Stormwater Utility CIP Projects • We need PIAC to dedicate a large fraction of the sales tax revenue to Stormwater improvements until the stormwater revenue is changed to allow capital improvements and increased to accommodate capital improvements. 50% would not get the job done, but it would help considerably. • This year we need an additional $500,000 for Gardner. • We will complete updated planning for Westport and it will require a few million to construct. We could begin design in fiscal year 2015 if we have funds to do it. • We are beginning to reconsider Crossroads solutions. We hope to begin a planning update in a few months, before the beginning of 2015. We will probably be ready to proceed with design in Late 2015 (fiscal year), if funds are available. • Indian Creek and Gooseneck Creek should follow that, with updated planning in fiscal 2016 and design / construction in fiscal 2017. • In addition, problems in residential areas that can affect the city economy should be dealt with as they arise. Opportunities include Town Fork Creek, Southern Clay County, small areas tributary to Blue River, and Hickman Mills Creek Basin.
5 09/10/13 • KCMO PIAC Process • KCMO Fiscal Year 2014 – May 1, 2013 to April 30, 2014 • FY15-FY19 Public Improvements Advisory Committee (PIAC) Schedule • June 5 through July 30, 2013 - Two neighborhood hearings in each council district • August 16 through August 22, 2013 – Four Citywide Hearings • August 31, 2013 - Deadline for all PIAC Requests • September 5 through September 17, 2012 - CIP Tech Committee reviews and finalizes the Five-Year Citywide requests • September 27, 2013 - PIAC Bus Tour • October 4 through October 25, 2013 - Department Presentations, Budget Office Sets Preliminary Revenues • Fridays, November 1 through November 22, 2013 - PIAC deliberations Citywide 5-year • Friday, December 13, 2013 – deadline for Citywide 5-year PIAC Recommendations • Friday, December 20, 2013 - PIAC finalizes FY15 In-District Recommendations
6 09/10/13 • Public Improvements Advisory Committee • Council Members appoint one person (total of 12) • Mayor appoints the chair • Chair - Deb HermannDISTRICT 1 – David Olson DISTRICT 4 – Greg Corwin • Paul Masao Matsuoka Jim MacDonald • DISTRICT 2 – Nelsie Sweeney DISTRICT 5 – Karen Downey • Christopher W. Byrd W. Ruth Turner • DISTRICT 3 – Forestine Beasley DISTRICT 6 - Vanessa Claborn-Welch • Bianca Tillard-Gates Stacey Johnson-Cosby
7 09/10/13 • KCMO PIAC Process • Funding Allocation • Average Total $111 million/year • Maintenance $37.5 million/year • In-District $20.5 million/year • Debt Service $44.5 million/year • CIP $8.5 million/year
8 09/10/13 • Stormwater Utility FY14 Projects
9 09/10/13 Numbers by Project Type Stormwater Utility FY14 CIP Summary Numbers by Funding Source
10 09/10/13 • Stormwater Utility FY15 to FY19 • Citywide What Project is Missing?
11 09/10/13 • Federal Funding Process • Energy and Water Civil Works Program • Federal Fiscal Year 2013 – October 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013 • February 2012 – President’s Budget • March 2012 – Senate Budget • April 2012 – House Budget • Conference to align Senate and House Budgets • President Signs Bill • October 1, 2012 – Beginning of Federal FY 2013 • Continuing Resolution Authority – CRA • US Army Corps of Engineers Workplan
12 09/10/13 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Program • Reconnaissance – 100% Federal • Feasibility – 50% Federal/50% Local • Design – Currently 75% Federal/25% Local • Construction – Currently 65% Federal/35% Local • Operations & Maintenance – 100% Local • Local funding match makeup: • 5% cash • LERRD • Additional cash to meet match percentage L – Lands E – Easements R – Rights-Of-Way R – Relocations D – Disposal Areas
13 09/10/13 • KCMO Stormwater Utility Civil Works Projects Federal/Local Mandated ProjectsPhaseCost Share Turkey Creek Construction 65%/35% Swope Park Industrial Area Construction 65%/35% Upper Blue River (Dodson) Construction 75%/25% Blue River ChannelConstructionLERRD Leveraged Projects Kansas Citys Levees - Phase 1 Design 75%/25% Kansas Citys Levees – Phase 2 Feasibility 50%/50% Brush Creek Improvements Feasibility 50%/50% Missouri River Degradation Feasibiility 50%/50% Line Creek Study 50%/50%
TURKEY CREEK 14 09/10/13 • STATUS • Completed: Tunnel repair, 3.8 RR • relocation, Levee/Environmental • Enhancements, Walled Channel • Construction, Restored Channel • Phase 1, Mill Street Bridge • Relocation by UG. • Contract with BNSF for relocation • of 4.4 RR Bridge to be completed • April 2014. • . CATEGORY: MANDATED DEPARTMENTAL PRIORITY: 1 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 4 TOTAL COST: $141 MIL 902 LIMIT: $122 MIL SPENTTO DATE: $86 MIL INCLUDES $12.7 MIL ARRA BENEFIT OF PROJECT More than $5 mil annual benefits to the protected and surrounding area. • STATUS • Phase 3 completed Spring 2010 • and included modifications to • two 96-inch diameter sewers • and gate structures. • Value engineering for Phase 4 • completed 2009. • Phase 4 currently under design • with construction expected in • 2012. • Cherokee and Rainbow • Interceptors under construction • to be completed September 2013 • and July 2014. • Restored Channel Phases 2 and 3 • and Missouri Interceptors Remain.
BRUSH CREEK IMPROVEMENTS 15 09/10/13 • STATUS • Through Brush Creek • Coordinating Committee and in • conjunction with Feasibility Study • with Corps and Johnson County • four action teams formed. • Environmental model (complete). • Watershed Management Plan – EPA • Urban Waters Initiative. • 18 communities. • Communications – • www.brushcreekwatershed.com • Projects - Bi-State Reach 1 mile of channel deepening and modifications, two bridge replacements, one bridge modification, two culvert installations, pedestrian paths, and ecosystem restoration. • Bruce R. Watkins Reach – Ecosystem restoration, park amenities, neighborhood connections. CATEGORY:LEVERAGED DEPARTMENTAL PRIORITY: 2 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3, 4, AND 5 TOTAL COST: $20 MIL SPENT TO DATE: $ 0 MIL BENEFIT OF PROJECT: Lower the floodplain below the level of the bridge decks that are currently overtopped, ecosystem restoration, connections.
SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA 16 09/10/13 CATEGORY: MANDATED DEPARTMENTAL PRIORITY: 3 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 TOTAL COST: $29 MIL 902 LIMIT: $25 MIL SPENT TO DATE: $8 MIL • STATUS • Bridge design in progress • through the Corps 100% • funded by the City. • Project Partnership Agreement • (PPA) with US Army Corps of • Engineers signed allowing • Construction to begin. • Design/Build contract • completed for interior • drainage. • BENEFIT OF PROJECT • Eliminates at grade RR crossing and protects this economically • vital business park comprised of various lean manufacturing facilities engaged in nationwide niche competition, providing over 400 skilled manufacturing jobs to the community from up to the 0.2 percent chance (500-year) flood event.
UPPER BLUE RIVER (DODSON) 17 09/10/13 • STATUS • Phases 1, 2, and 3 complete. • Phase 4A site prep awarded • September 30, 2011 and • completed. • Remaining Phase 4 under design. • BENEFIT OF PROJECT • 500-year flood protection of nearly $240,000,000 of property investment and 1,250 employees. Levee/floodwall system will keep the corridor open during rainfall events for safe egress to major highways. Maintains the commercial viability of the District. CATEGORY: MANDATED DEPARTMENTAL PRIORITY: 4 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 TOTAL COST: $47.2 MIL 902 LIMIT: $32 MIL SPENT TO DATE: $ 26 MIL
KANSAS CITYS LEVEES 18 09/10/13 • STATUS • Phase I - Argentine, North • Kansas City, Fairfax-Jersey • Creek, East Bottoms. • Feasibility Study completed. • Construction began on North • Kansas City. • Design Agreement (PED) • executed for East Bottoms. • Phase II – Armourdale, CID-KS, CID-MO • Feasibility Study scheduled for completion in 2013. • BENEFIT OF PROJECT • Protection of thousands of commercial, industrial and residential structures with a combined investment totaled at more than $15 billion. • . CATEGORY: LEVERAGED DEPARTMENTAL PRIORITY: 5 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 4; CITYWIDE EFFECTS TOTAL COST: PHASE 1: $99 MIL PHASE 2: $405 MIL KCMO UNITS: PHASE 1: $2.1 MIL PHASE 2: $0.5 MIL
19 09/10/13 Phase 1 Project Costs
20 09/10/13 Phase 2 Draft Project Costs
BLUE RIVER CHANNEL 21 09/10/13 • STATUS • Brush Creek to 53rd Street reach • completed Spring 2010 with • $7.7 mil ARRA funding. • 53rdStreet to 63rd reach completed • December 2011 with $5.5 mil • ARRA funding. • Byram’s Ford restoration completed • Summer 2012 with 3 year warranty • period for plantings. • Phase 1 O&M completed. • Phase 2 O&M to be awarded 2014. • Colorado Bridge replacing the demolished lower Blue Parkway Bridge • and associated intersection and roadway work completed Spring 2012. • Blue River Trails preliminary design complete with CMAQ funds. Final design • expected in 2013. Bid opening for construction of Phases 1 and 2 of 3 with STP • and TA/TE funds May 1, 2014. • BENEFIT OF PROJECT • Completed project will lower 100-year flood levels approximately 6 to 8 feet to protect 4,100 businesses employing 66,100 people, and many residential neighborhoods. COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3, 4, AND 5 TOTAL COST: $300 MIL SPENT TO DATE: $299 MIL INCLUDES $13.2 MIL ARRA
22 09/10/13 • OTHER WATERWAYS PROJECTS • Missouri River Degradation • Line Creek • Blue River Greenway • Little Blue River Basin
23 09/10/13 Fall 2013 Visit to Washington, DC September 30 to October 3, 2013 and Joining together as a coalition to present our requests for water resources in Greater Kansas City and the surrounding region
24 09/10/13 AGENCIES AND CONGRESSIONAL VISITS • Army Corps of Engineers Headquarters • Office of Management and Budget (OMB) • Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) • Senate and House Committees • Missouri and Kansas Senators and House Representatives
25 09/10/13 PROJECT STRATEGIES • Watershed Approach • Integration of Green Infrastructure • Multi-Purpose using Multi-Source funding for Maximum Benefits • Strong Non-Federal Sponsor and Stakeholder Support and Team Membership • Team Management Structure • Regional Prioritization
26 09/10/13 Stormwater Utility FY14 Update FY15 to FY19 Planning September 10, 2013 Mark Young Stormwater Division Manager 816-513-0260 mark.young@kcmo.org Lynda L Hoffman Waterways Division Manager 816-513-0489 lynda.hoffman@kcmo.org Questions?