1 / 12

By: Se Kim

By: Se Kim. By: Se Kim Module 3: Market Multiples January 26, 2014. Trading Liquidity. 3,242MN shares outstanding at $74.42 at close on January 24 th Market cap: $240.81BN Avg. volume: 1.8MN January 31 st ,2013 – end of fiscal year $68.27 March 26 th , 2013 – release 10-k $73.45.

ace
Download Presentation

By: Se Kim

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. By: Se Kim By: Se Kim Module 3: Market Multiples January 26, 2014

  2. Trading Liquidity • 3,242MN shares outstanding at $74.42 at close on January 24th • Market cap: $240.81BN • Avg. volume: 1.8MN • January 31st,2013 – end of fiscal year • $68.27 • March 26th, 2013 – release 10-k • $73.45

  3. Market Multiples • Value = Performance measure x market multiple • BS: Net Enterprise Assets, Book Value, • IS: Enterprise Profit after Taxes Net Income, Comprehensive Income, Sales • Comparable Companies: • Cabela, Hibbett, Target

  4. Net Enterprise Assets • $147.00 vs. $73.45 or $68.17 • HIBB’s market multiple is an outlier • WMT’s estimate is about twice as much as the market price

  5. Book Value • $136.43 vs. $73.45 or $68.17 • BV = NEA - NFL • Market price is significantly undervalued • Companies do not have similar capital structures

  6. EPAT • $141.94 vs. $73.45 or $68.17 • CAB has a high multiple, bringing the average up

  7. Net Income • $101.68 vs. $73.45 or $68.17 • Market price is undervalued • TGT has a drastically different NI multiple

  8. Comprehensive Income • $245.96 vs. $73.45 or $68.17 • High variability affects the multiple calculation • Irrelevant b/c of the irregularity

  9. Revenue • $224.33 vs. $73.45 or $68.17 • Revenue is inconsistent – about 7 times bigger than its closest competitor

  10. Combination vs. TGT • $67.10 vs. $73.45 or $68.17 • Excluded CI & Revenue • Market price is slightly overvalued using TGT’s market multiples

  11. Recommendation • Upon analysis: HOLD • WMT valuation using all three comparable companies paint an inaccurate picture • Comparing WMT w/ only TGT – a more consistent valuation • $67.40 vs. $68.17

  12. Questions??

More Related