380 likes | 421 Views
Basic Electron Microscopy. Arthur Rowe. The Knowledge Base at a Simple Level. Introduction. These 3 presentations cover the fundamental theory of electron microscopy In presentation #3 we cover: requirements for imaging macromolecules aids such as gold-labelled antibodies
E N D
Basic Electron Microscopy Arthur Rowe The Knowledge Base at a Simple Level
Introduction • These 3 presentations cover the fundamental theory of electron microscopy • In presentation #3 we cover: • requirements for imaging macromolecules • aids such as gold-labelled antibodies • the negative staining method • the metal-shadowing method • Including high-resolution modifications • vitritied ice technology • examples of each type of method
requirements for imaging macromolecules • sufficient CONTRAST must be attainable, but • > bio-molecules are made up of low A.N. atoms • > & are of small dimensions (4+ nm) • > hence contrast must usually be added • sufficient STABILITY in the beam is needed • > to enable an image to be recorded • > low dose ‘random’ imaging mandatory for any • high resolution work
ways of imaging macromolecules • ADDING CONTRAST (with heavy metals) • > negative contrast • + computer analysis • + immunogold labels • > metal shadowing • + computer enhancement • USING INTRINSIC CONTRAST • > particles in thin film of vitrified ice • + computer acquisition & processing
ways of imaging macromolecules • using immunogold labels to localise epitopes • > widely used in cell biology • > beginning to be of importance for macromolecules Au sphere Mab epitope macromolecule
negative staining particles Electron dense negative stain
negative staining • • requires minimal interaction between particle & ‘stain’ • to avoid binding, heavy metal ion should be of same charge +/- as the particle • positive staining usually destructive of bio-particles • biological material usually -ve charge at neutral pH • widely used negative contrast media include: • anionic cationic • phosphotungstate uranyl actetate/formate • molybdate (ammonium) (@ pH ~ 4)
metal shadowing - 1-directional • Contrast usually inverted to give dark shadows • > resolution 2 - 3 nm - single 2-fold a-helix detectable • - historic use for surface detail • - now replaced by SEM • > detail on ‘shadow’ side of the particle can be lost • > apparent ‘shape’ can be distorted • > problems with orientation of elongated specimens • - detail can be lost when direction of • shadowing same as that of feature • > very limited modern use for macromolecular work
metal shadowing - rotary • Contrast usually inverted to give dark shadows • > resolution 2 - 3 nm - single DNA strand detectable • - historic use for ‘molecular biology’ • (e.g. heteroduplex mapping) • > good preservation of shape, but enlargement of • apparent dimensions • > in very recent modification (MCD - microcrystallite • decoration), resolution ~1.1 nm
particle in vitrified ice:low contrast particle particles examined at v. low temperature, frozen in a thin layer of vitrified (structureless) ice - i.e. no contrast added
particle in vitrified ice:low contrast average of large numbers (thousands +) of very low contrast particles enables a structure to be determined
particle in vitrified ice:low contrast • average of large numbers (thousands +) of very low contrast particles enables a structure to be determined: • resolution may be typically 1 nm or better • this is enough to define the “outline” (or ‘envelope’) of a large structure • detailed high resolution data give us models for domains (or sub-domains) which can be ‘fitted into’ the envelope • ultimate resolution of the method ~0.2 nm, rivalling XRC/NMR
case study : GroEL-GroES • • important chaperonins • hollow structure • • appear to require ATP (hydrolysis ?) for activity
particle in vitrified ice:low contrast the chaperonin protein GroEL visualised in vitrified ice (Helen Saibil & co-workers)
case study : pneumolysin • 53 kD protein, toxin secreted from Pneumococcus pneumoniae • among other effects, damages membrane by forming pores • major causative agent of clinicalsymptoms in pneumonia
electron micrographs of pores in membranes caused by pneumolysin RBC / negative staining membrane fragment metal shadowed
Pneumolysin Homology model based upon the known crystallographic structure of Perfringolysin
Pneumolysin - homology model ± domain 3, fitted to cryo reconstruction
Pneumolysin - EM by microcrystallite decoration (MCD) reveals orientation of domains
Pneumolysin - monomers identified within the oligomeric form (i.e. the pore form)
case study : myosin S1 • motor domain of the skeletal muscle protein myosin • 2 S1’s / myosin, mass c. 120 kD • ‘cross-bridge’ between myosin and actin filaments, thought to be source of force generation
myosin is a 2-stranded coiled-coil protein, with 2 globular (S1) ‘heads’ S1 unit
Each S1 unit has a compact region, & a ‘lever arm’ connected via a ‘hinge’ to the main extended ‘tail’
Myosin S1 imaged by Microcrystallite Decoration (no nucleotide present)
Effect of nucleotide (ADP) on the conformation of myosin S1 as seen by MCD electron microscopy -ADP +ADP
case study : epitope localisation in an engineered vaccine • a new vaccine for Hepatitis B contains 3 antigens, S, S1 & S2, with epitopes on each • but does every particle of ‘hepagene’ contain all 3 of these epitopes ? • Mabs against S, S1 & S2 have been made & conjugated with gold: S 15 nm S1 10 nm S2 5 nm
immunolabelling of one epitope (S1) in hepagene using 10 nm-Au labelled Mab
Basic Electron Microscopy Arthur Rowe End