410 likes | 651 Views
Why We Should All Care About Diversity and Equity. Why should those who are not marginalized care about diversity and equity?A nation and all its residents share a linked fate This issue is particularly important for regions today Disparities make the region less competitive, nationally and globally.
E N D
1. Achieving Equitable Education in Calhoun County Rebecca Reno
Research Associate, The Kirwan Institute
September 23, 2006
3. Democratic Implications of Failing to Achieve Diversity Equitable public education has implications for our democratic society
Education as gatekeepers to our democracy
Our inequitable arrangements are making it difficult, if not impossible to achieve either legitimate education or a true democracy
Without full diversity we are not adequately preparing students for citizenship in our nation, or our global society
4. Process of Educational Reform Start with goals
Define equitable education
Define the greater goals of public education
Check current conditions against goals
Identify factors creating & perpetuating current inequities
Design and implement reform
5. Setting Goals
6. Setting Goals Must start with a definitive vision of the end goal
Education Vision Statement: Equal access for all students to have opportunities and resources to achieve their fullest potential and to encourage and help each child to take advantage of that access.
What does equitable education look like, how do we know when we’ve arrived?
Funding, academic performance, democratic participation, etc.
7. Overarching Goals of Public Education “The function of education is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically....Intelligence plus character-that is the goal of true education.”
-Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
The Purpose of Education Speech
8. Goals of Education What are our educational goals?
The mission statement for the US Department of Education includes: ensuring equal access to education and promoting educational excellence throughout the nation.
The U.S. Supreme Court has identified the objective of pubic education as the "[inculcation of] fundamental values necessary to the maintenance of a democratic political system." -Ambach v. Norwick, 441 U.S. 68, 76-77 (1979)
9. Goals of Education What are our educational goals? (Cont.)
Education has both a public purpose:
Employment
Preparing Students for Citizenship
And a private purpose:
Building Human Capacity (personal/social)
10. Public Goals of Education Serving the job marketplace is one of the fundamental roles of education.
Higher Education: Education should prepare students for success in colleges and universities
and/or
Employment: Education should develop job skills and train students for employment
This ensures the U.S. can compete economically with the rest of the world
This represents the bulk of our education efforts
11. Public Goals of Education Serving a democratic society is one of the fundamental roles of education
Preparing students for citizenship has been a stated goal of American education throughout U.S. history
Instill fundamental values & transmit knowledge necessary to partake in our democracy
In 2002, the Supreme Court in Grutter acknowledged the importance of preparing students for citizenship
12. Goals of Education Serving the individual is one of the fundamental roles of education
Building Human Capacity:
Developing individual character and values such as honesty, integrity, self-discipline, hard work, volunteerism and charity
Create good community members and good global citizens by teaching students to take and hold the perspective of others
Stress the interdependence among people and between people and their environment
13. Factors & Conditions
14. Current Conditions in Public Education Economic Segregation
Racial Segregation
Achievement Gap
Discipline Rates
Funding Disparities
Graduation Rates
WHAT IS CAUSING THESE DISPARITIES?
15. Education Factors: Institutional Arrangements Funding
Has long been identified as inequitable; generally little success in reforming
16. Education Factors: Institutional Arrangements (cont.) Racial Integration
Racially integrated schools have demonstrated positive social, psychological, and academic benefits.
Efforts to achieve being increasingly challenged in court, and are subsequently abandoned.
Economic Segregation
Rates of economic segregation high, and rising. Correlates strongly with racial segregation
Socioeconomic status of the school, after the influence of the family, remains the greatest predictor of student success and achievement
17. Teacher Quality
Low income students and students of color are less likely to have highly qualified teachers, have higher rates of teacher turnover, more uncertified teachers and are more likely to have a new teacher who is teaching outside the subject they were trained in
Teacher/Staff/Administrative Diversity
Nationally, 2001-2002 60% of public school students White, 90% of teachers are. Black students 17%, while teachers constitute only 5%.
Benefits of diversity: role models, understanding of cultural differences, higher expectations for ethnic groups, encourages students to perform better, can work towards breaking down stereotypes. Education Factors: Institutional Arrangements (cont.)
18. Curriculum/Pedagogy
Often diluted, non-engaging, culturally biased, and transmits low expectations.
This has a direct negative effect on students’ performance
Academic Tracking/Ability Grouping
By race:
Students of color 7 times more likely to be in a lower track class
Half as likely to be in a gifted class
By class: “A highly proficient low-income student has a 50% chance of being placed in a high track class
Undermines any integration efforts Education Factors: In-School Practices
19. Special Education
African American males overrepresented
Also over-diagnosed with mental retardation, specific learning disabilities, and categorized as having emotional disturbances
Discipline
Blacks, particularly males often subject to more frequent and more harsh disciplinary actions, even when controlling for behavior
Black males two to five times more likely to be suspended than white males.
Teacher & Student Retention
Education Factors: In-School Practices (cont.)
20. Early Childhood Education
More we learn, more we are capable of learning
Over 80% of the gap in 4th grade reading scores already discernable in kindergarten
Community Engagement and Resources
Support networks, resources (libraries, tutoring programs)
Health
Prenatal care: African Americans and Hispanic women are twice more likely to receive late or no prenatal care
Low income children have less access to high quality healthcare, and are more likely to suffer from untreated dental and vision problems, poor nutrition and environmental-induced diseases Education Factors: Out of School
21. Environment
Lead
9x higher levels of lead in low-income children
6 million children lost an average of 7 IQ points because of lead exposure
Asthma
African Americans hospitalized four times the rate of whites
Pollution and vacant housing associated with a 40% increased risk of asthma over age two
Housing
Linked to student retention.
By kindergarten, over 48% of low income children have lived in at least three homes
Black students are twice as likely to change schools frequently
Parental Education & SES
Leading indicator of student academic achievement
Education Factors: Out of School (cont.)
22. Constructing a Solution: Best Practices
23. Overarching Education Policy: Economic Integration Need sustainable reform
Solution must have the scope and breadth to disrupt the current arrangement
Quality varies by locale
Schools reflect racial, ethnic and SES segregation of the region
Integration
By Race
By Socioeconomic Status
24. Race & Class Intersections Increased racial and economic segregation in the 1990s
More than 70% of African Americans and 76% of Latinos attend mostly minority schools1
Nationally the average white student attends a school with fewer than 20% low-income students. African American and Latino students attend a school with 44% low-income students2
25. Negative Factors Correlated with Socioeconomic Segregation A middle-class school is 22x more likely to be high performing than a low-income school
Inadequate funding & resources
Negative peer influences
Low levels of parental involvement
Low expectations, lower standards
26. Negative Factors Correlated with Socioeconomic Segregation Discipline problems
High student mobility
Under-qualified teachers
More inexperienced
Academically weak
Teaching in subjects not trained for
Educators that haven’t received “sustained professional development”
27. Teacher Quality & Attrition
28. Benefits of Socioeconomic Integration Increased student expectations
Access to social capital
Affects cognitive development for ALL students
Opportunities to interact in deeper and more meaningful ways, Increased perspective taking, Higher levels of Reasoning
Improves academic achievement for low income students and students of color
29. High-Poverty Schools The top line tracks the score of middle-class students on the fourth grade National Assessment of Education Progress math test, and the bottom line shows the scores of low-income students. Students from both groups do better on the left side of the figure (in middle-income schools) and do worse as they move to the right (in high-poverty schools). Striking ly, low-income students in middle-class schools score better than middle class students in the highest-poverty schools.The top line tracks the score of middle-class students on the fourth grade National Assessment of Education Progress math test, and the bottom line shows the scores of low-income students. Students from both groups do better on the left side of the figure (in middle-income schools) and do worse as they move to the right (in high-poverty schools). Striking ly, low-income students in middle-class schools score better than middle class students in the highest-poverty schools.
30. Benefits of Socioeconomic Integration (cont.) Schools better able to attract and retain teachers
Decreases drop out rates
Higher career aspirations
Students more likely to attend college
Fewer incidents with police
Less likely to become teenage parents
31. Overarching Education Policy: Regional Education District magnet/charter schools
Create high-quality magnet schools with academic, economic thresholds
Wake County Raleigh, NC
No more than 40% low income
No more than 25% performing below grade level on state reading test
Of the 36 Schools of Excellence designated by Magnet Schools of America in 2006, eight were in Raleigh
Black students: 40% to 80% grade level on standardized tests (10 years). Hispanic students: 79% to 91%. White students: performance did not decrease.
32. Overarching Education Policy: Regional Education Suburban schools: designated vouchers/choice plan
Provide academic support, transportation
Connect to regional housing policies
Minneapolis Choice is Yours
Free & Reduced Lunch Students given free and reduced lunch are given priority placement in suburban or magnet schools of their choice
Participants outperformed their peers, with scores in reading and mathematics that were respectively 23 and 25 percentile points higher
33. Overcoming Barriers & Resistance Residential Segregation
Controlled Choice
Housing Integration
Political Challenges
School parents would choose a “good diverse school” over an “outstanding homogenous school” by a 67% to 26% margin
By 75% to 21% Americans favor public school choice across district lines
Financial/Jurisdictional Challenges:
When possible offer financial incentives- St. Louis
34. In-School Reform Funding disparities
Work towards equalizing funding, but also determine most effective way to use funds
Eliminating detracking
Rockville Centre, New York
US Department of Education – high school advanced math most strongly associated factor with college graduation
Achievement rose for ALL groups Including SES and GPAIncluding SES and GPA
35. Success of Detracking
36. Discipline Reform
Move from punitive, harsh model that removes student from the classroom
Focus on more democratic model: Student Responsibility Centers (Grand Rapids), Youth Courts
SRCs: One year prior to implementation there were 5,000 referrals to the office. 2002-2003 following the implementation, 546 plans were constructed, only 29 students transferred to the alternative high school, and the school experienced a 89% overall reduction in discipline. In-School Reform
37. Collaborative Education
Actively include the voice of parents, teachers, staff community members, businesses and organizations to make the schools truly public
Focus on Democratic Merit: Service Learning
Develops civic engagement, increases knowledge of community needs, more sophisticated understanding of politics, greater commitment to community service
In-School Reform
38. Early Childhood Education
Work to provide every child with a preschool education
Connect the discontinuous education pipeline
Link P-12 to postsecondary education & employment In-School Reform
39. Moving Forward Reframe the Issue
Education reform for the benefit of ALL students, not just those historically disadvantaged.
Equity AS excellence.
Maximize public investments
Reform for regional health
½ of those who drop out or are pushed out are unemployed.
80% of prisoners did not complete high school½ of those who drop out or are pushed out are unemployed.
80% of prisoners did not complete high school
40. Moving Forward Plan big, start small
Conduct ongoing research
Build upon successes
Extensive public communication
Regional collaboration
Extend beyond education: Housing policy is education policy. Any serious effort must be inclusive of both.
41. www.KirwanInstitute.org