1 / 45

Responsiveness-to-Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support

Responsiveness-to-Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support. George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut December 2, 2008 www.pbis.org www.cber.org George.sugai@uconn.edu. PURPOSE

addison
Download Presentation

Responsiveness-to-Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Responsiveness-to-Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut December 2, 2008 www.pbis.org www.cber.org George.sugai@uconn.edu

  2. PURPOSE Describe how responsiveness-to-intervention logic is represented in implementation of positive behavioral interventions & supports for EVERYONE in school. • RtI Context/Review • PBIS Basics • Applications & Examples

  3. Responsiveness-to-Intervention

  4. Response to Intervention RtI

  5. RtI: Good “IDEiA” Policy Approach or framework for redesigning & establishing teaching & learning environments that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable for all students, families & educators • NOT program, curriculum, strategy, intervention • NOT limited to special education • NOT new

  6. Quotable Fixsen “Policy is allocation of limited resources for unlimited needs • Opportunity, not guarantee, for good action” “Training does not predict action” • “Manualized treatments have created overly rigid & rapid applications”

  7. Responsiveness to Intervention

  8. Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT FEW ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% SOME Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ALL ~80% of Students

  9. Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • High Intensity • Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • Intense, durable procedures • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Universal Interventions • All students • Preventive, proactive • Universal Interventions • All settings, all students • Preventive, proactive Responsiveness to Intervention Academic Systems Behavioral Systems 1-5% 1-5% 5-10% 5-10% 80-90% 80-90% Circa 1996

  10. RtI Application Examples

  11. RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Few Some All Dec 7, 2007

  12. School-wide Positive Behavior Support & RtI

  13. Need for….

  14. “141 Days!” Intermediate/senior high school with 880 students reported over 5,100 office discipline referrals in one academic year. Nearly 2/3 of students have received at least one office discipline referral.

  15. 5,100 referrals = 76,500 min @15 min = 1,275 hrs = 159 days @ 8 hrs

  16. BIG IDEA Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, durable, & scalable (Zins & Ponti, 1990)

  17. Integrated Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior DATA SYSTEMS PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior

  18. GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Team Agreements • School-wide agreements • District investment • 3-4 year training commitment • Local coordination, coaching, & evaluation Data-based Action Plan Evaluation Implementation

  19. Working Smarter

  20. Sample Teaming Matrix Are outcomes measurable?

  21. WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT PREVENTING VIOLENCE? • Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) • Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) • Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) • White House Conference on School Violence (2006) • Positive, predictable school-wide climate • High rates of academic & socialsuccess • Formal social skills instruction • Positive active supervision & reinforcement • Positive adult role models • Multi-component, multi-year school-family-community effort

  22. SWPBS Practices School-wide Classroom • Smallest # • Evidence-based • Biggest, durable effect Family Non-classroom Student

  23. School-wide • Leadership team • Behavior purpose statement • Set of positive expectations & behaviors • Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior • Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior • Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations • Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation

  24. 2. NATURAL CONTEXT 1. SOCIAL SKILL Expectations 3. BEHAVIOR EXAMPLES

  25. Pre Post

  26. Non-classroom • Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged • Active supervision by all staff • Scan, move, interact • Precorrections & reminders • Positive reinforcement

  27. Franzen, K., & Kamps, D. (2008).

  28. Classroom • Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged • Teaching classroom routines & cuestaught & encouraged • Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adult-student interaction • Active supervision • Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors • Frequent precorrections for chronic errors • Effective academic instruction & curriculum

  29. Allday & Pakurar (2007)

  30. 1. SOCIAL SKILL 2. NATURAL CONTEXT 3. BEHAVIOR EXAMPLES

  31. Family • Continuum of positive behavior support for all families • Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements • Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner • Access to system of integrated school & community resources

  32. 1. SOCIAL SKILL 2. NATURAL CONTEXT Expectations 3. BEHAVIOR EXAMPLES

  33. Individual Student • Behavioral competence at school & district levels • Function-based behavior support planning • Team- & data-based decision making • Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes • Targeted social skills & self-management instruction • Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations

  34. CONTINUUM of SWPBS • TERTIARY PREVENTION • Function-based support • Wraparound/PCP • Special Education Audit Identify existing practices by tier Specify outcome for each effort Evaluate implementation accuracy & outcome effectiveness Eliminate/integrate based on outcomes Establish decision rules (RtI) ~5% ~15% • SECONDARY PREVENTION • Check in/out • Targeted social skills instruction • Peer-based supports • Social skills club • PRIMARY PREVENTION • Teach & encourage positive SW expectations • Proactive SW discipline • Effective instruction • Parent engagement ~80% of Students

  35. 2000 Model Demonstration Schools 2004 Schools 2005 Schools 2006 Schools 2007 Schools Participating Schools 2008 Schools Partnering with 38 ISDs 151 School Districts 340 School Buildings ~9,000 Staff Impacting ~130,000 Students

  36. Connections at State and National Levels • Leadership Team • Dr. Jacquelyn ThompsonDirector, Special Education and Early Intervention Services • Betty Underwood • Acting Director, School Improvement • Shari KrishnanParent/Advocate • Beth SteenwykDirector of State Projects, Michigan's Integrated Improvement Initiatives • Betsy MacLeodMichigan Reading First • Mark CoscarellaMichigan Reading First • Kathleen StrausPresident, State Board of Education • Elizabeth BauerMember, State Board of Education • National Advisors • Dr. Rob Horner • Co-director, OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Support • Dr. Roland Good • Co-author of Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills • Dr. David Tilly • Researcher and content expert in the area of Response to Intervention • Dr. Dan Reschly • Researcher and content expert in the area of Response to Intervention • Dr. Greg Roberts • Researcher and content expert in the area of Reading and Response to Intervention www.cenmi.org/miblsi

More Related