1 / 17

StaticRoute : A novel router for the dynamic partial reconfiguration of FPGAs

StaticRoute : A novel router for the dynamic partial reconfiguration of FPGAs. Brahim Al Farisi , Karel Bruneel, Dirk Stroobandt 2/9/2013. Dynamic partial reconfiguration (DPR). M 3. M 3. M 1. M 1. M 2. M 2. Advantages: Smaller area Lower power usage. Disadvantage:

aderes
Download Presentation

StaticRoute : A novel router for the dynamic partial reconfiguration of FPGAs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. StaticRoute: A novel router forthe dynamicpartialreconfiguration of FPGAs Brahim Al Farisi, Karel Bruneel, Dirk Stroobandt 2/9/2013

  2. Dynamic partial reconfiguration (DPR) M3 M3 M1 M1 M2 M2 • Advantages: • Smaller area • Lower power usage • Disadvantage: • Reconfiguration time • Goal: area reduction with reduced reconfiguration time

  3. Conventional DPR tool flow • Different circuits are implemented independently • Complete area is rewritten  Problem: long reconfiguration times

  4. Static vs dynamic bits After implementation: • Each memory cell corresponds to a collection of bit values • This collection of bit values is called • a static bit,when the values are the same for all circuits • a dynamic bit, otherwise

  5. Clustering of dynamic bits • Only memory cells that contain a dynamic bit need to be rewritten during run-time • Configuration memory of an FPGA is frame-based • Dynamic bits are scattered over the frames • Approach in this work: • Divide configuration frames into dynamic and static ones • Cluster dynamic bits into the dynamic frames

  6. CLBs vs routing • In our experiments: • 10% of the configuration memory consists of CLB bits • 90% of the configuration memory consists of routing bits Most of the time spent in reconfiguring the routing infrastructure • Focus on reducing reconfiguration time of routing • All CLB frames are dynamic • Routing frames are divided in static and dynamic ones • Novel router, called StaticRoute, that clusters dynamic routing bits in the dynamic routing frames

  7. Proposed DPR tool flow

  8. PathFinder • Makes use of a routing resource graph (RRG): directed graph where nodes represent wires and edges represent routing switches • For each net PathFinder finds a minimum cost tree in the RRG • In a first iteration nets are allowed to share resources, i.e. wire congestion is allowed • Negotiated congestion • Cost function of a node in the RRG:

  9. StaticRoute • Extended Pathfinder algorithm that also clusters dynamic routing bits into dynamic routing frames • Makes use of an extended routing resource graph (eRRG): • switches are also represented by nodes • mark switches as static/dynamic • keep information about the switches during routing • Detecting dynamic bits • After routing: easy • During routing: not obvious

  10. Detecting dynamic bits In general, in the extended RRG, a switch node S connectstwowirenodes Winand Wout. Let usassumethat S is usedby a set of circuits CS . Winand Wout are usedbyCinand Coutrespectively. We state that S is controlledby a dynamic bit if: ((CS ̸=Cin)∨(CS ̸=Cout))∧CS ̸=φ.

  11. Novel cost function StaticRoute • Switch congestion: when a static switch is controlled by a dynamic bit • StaticRoute iterates until both wire and switch congestion are resolved • Novel cost function:

  12. Experiments • Regular expression matching, adaptive filtering, general MCNC and MCNC20 benchmarks • 200-1500 LBs • Considered only 2 circuits at a time • Comparison of conventional DPR and new flow that uses StaticRoute • Metrics: • Reconfiguration time • Wire length (of each circuit separately)

  13. Results – Reconfiguration time

  14. Results – Reconfiguration time

  15. Results – Wire length

  16. Conclusions • Possible to detect dynamic bits during routing • Introduced notion of switch congestion • Novel router, called StaticRoute, that resolves both wire and switch congestion • Using novel DPR tool flow that uses StaticRoute: • Total reconfiguration speed-up of approx. 2X • Increase in wire length is limited

  17. StaticRoute: A novel router for the dynamicpartialreconfigurationof Brahim Al Farisi, Karel Bruneel, Dirk Stroobandt 2/9/2013

More Related