180 likes | 552 Views
Global Business . Drivers of Globalization. Business Needs Lower cost factors of production (labor, natural resources) Larger market size to support efficient scale and justify large investment in R&D and product development Extended product life cycle. Opportunities
E N D
Drivers of Globalization Business Needs • Lower cost factors of production (labor, natural resources) • Larger market size to support efficient scale and justify large investment in R&D and product development • Extended product life cycle Opportunities • Growth of emerging nations • Declining trade and investment barriers • Common customer requirements • Increasing demand for universal products
Organic Growth • No excess capacity • Full control • No cultural barriers • New markets and high tech markets
Exporting • Allows scale and experience curve economies But • High transportation costs • Trade barriers • Problems with local marketing agents
Licensing • Low development costs • Low risks But • Lack of control over technology • No scale and experience curve economies • Can’t engage in global strategic coordination
Franchising • Low development costs • Low risks But • Lack of control over quality • Can’t engage in global strategic coordination
Joint Ventures • Access to local partner’s knowledge • Shared development costs • Shared risks But • Lack of control over technology • Can’t engage in global strategic coordination
Wholly Owned Subsidiaries • Control over operations • Protection of technology • Ability to engage in global strategic coordination • Ability to realize scale and experience economies But • High costs and risks
Mergers and Acquisitions • Speed of entry • Access to technology • Speed of building market share • Bypass regulatory barriers But • Risk of overcapacity
Trade Off: Local Responsiveness vs. Economies of Scale Local Responsiveness necessary when • Products are different across countries • Distribution channels require local presence • Government requirements demand local presence Scale Economies necessary when • Competitive pressure requires cost reduction • Economic logic requires cost reduction
International strategy Global standardization strategy Localization strategy Transnational strategy Wholly Owned Subsidiaries:4 Strategies for Globalization High Low PressureforCostReduction Pressure for Local Responsiveness High
Global Standardization Strategy • High pressure for cost and local responsiveness • Standardized product worldwide • Production, marketing, and R&D concentrated in a few favorable locations • Cost reductions from • Economies of scale • Learning curve efficiencies • Location economies • Ikea
International Strategy • Low pressure for cost and local responsiveness • Product serves universal needs, but few competitors to create cost pressure (e.g., Xerox in 60s, patent) • Centralized product development (R&D) • Decentralized manufacturing and marketing with minimal local customization • Duplication expensive; no scale advantages • Tight home office control • Toys R Us, IBM, Kellogg
Localization Strategy • Customize products and marketing strategies to match national tastes and conditions • Full set of functions (production, marketing, R&D, etc.) in each national market • High cost structure • Maximum local responsiveness at expense of scale economies • Aka Multinational or Multidomestic strategy • Proctor and Gamble
Transnational Strategy • Pressure for cost reduction and local responsiveness • Low costs through location economies, economies of scale and learning effects • Differentiate across markets • Foster flow of skills among subsidiaries in global network • Conflict: differentiation raises costs • Ford tried and found it difficult to implement • Caterpillar more successful
Future of Globalization • MNEs in Japan, North America and Europe control > 85% of world’s foreign investment • Emerging economies (China, India, South Korea, Mexico, Brazil) developing transnational capabilities • Importance of international business is rising • M&A is preferred market entry strategy for MNEs • 45% of M&A transactions are cross-border • US and Europe each account for 40% of global M&A volume