1 / 10

Phosphorus Volatility Chevron Oronite Perspective

Phosphorus Volatility Chevron Oronite Perspective. February 2007. Phosphorus Volatility. Desired outcome: Identify an effective bench test method to measure P-Vol We believe that PEI165 represents best available option We have worked with Savant to evaluate PEI165 more fully

adora
Download Presentation

Phosphorus Volatility Chevron Oronite Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Phosphorus VolatilityChevron Oronite Perspective February 2007

  2. Phosphorus Volatility • Desired outcome: Identify an effective bench test method to measure P-Vol • We believe that PEI165 represents best available option • We have worked with Savant to evaluate PEI165 more fully • PEI 165 correlates with both field and IIIG data • PEI165 also ranks ZDP in line with chemical composition relating to volatility • Discrimination power greater than IIIG • ROBO should continue evaluation as alternative

  3. PEI165: Thermal Stability • PEI165 correctly ranked primary vs. secondary ZDP (thermal stability and volatility) Courtesy: Savant

  4. PEI165: ZDP Volatility • Created model ZDP compounds to generate controlled volatility • PEI165 correctly ranked against ZDP volatility repeats Less volatile

  5. PEI165: Field test correlation • Ranked corrected against Ford field test reference oils Courtesy: Savant

  6. PEI 165 vs. IIIG Hypothetical point TMC 435 TMC 434 Ford field test Using the trend line above: IIIG 84.4% = 50.1 mg/L PEI165 IIIG 82% = 58.6 mg/L PEI165

  7. PEI165: repeatability

  8. PEI165 Summary • Provides correct correlation with ZDP type, ZDP molecular weight, Ford field test and IIIG • Provides better separation than IIIG (~10% in IIIG vs. ~50 mg in PEI165) • Provides better test repeatability • Preserves IIIG parts • Cost effective versus IIIG Assuming no change in P chemical limit, Oronite supports PEI165 with appropriate P/F limit

  9. ROBO for P Retention • ROBO P retention correlates with IIIG reference oils (courtesy: Rohmax and GM) • TMC 434 80.3% • TMC 435 88.8% • TMC 438 81.% • Provides an 8.5% separation between 434 and 435

  10. ROBO for P Retention • ROBO repeatability is a concern • Two repeats (B) differ by 10% • A third (A) is different only in base stock • Will require more study or development

More Related