220 likes | 317 Views
K-5 Literacy Field Study and Adoption:. Where We’ve Been and Where We Are Headed. What led to the decision to adopt new materials? Data Classroom Observations District-wide Materials Inventory Teacher Feedback. K-5 Data. Reading 3D DIBELS/TRC K-3 General Trends
E N D
K-5 Literacy Field Study and Adoption: Where We’ve Been and Where We Are Headed
What led to the decision to adoptnew materials?Data Classroom Observations District-wide Materials Inventory Teacher Feedback
K-5 Data • Reading 3D DIBELS/TRC K-3 General Trends • 20-30% of our student population is struggling in the area of phonemic awareness and phonics instruction • 24% of our student population is exceeding our grade level standards in TRC • DRA 4-5 General Trends • A portion of our student population is struggling with inferential thinking • A portion of our student population is struggling with accuracy and fluency
Classroom Observations • Dr. Cudeiro’s classroom visits: K-5 literacy block varied greatly from classroom to classroom and school to school
Inventory of Resources • Inventory of district-wide resources revealed that overall, our schools lacked similar instructional materials to effectively teach literacy. • Phonemic awareness • Alphabetic principle • Accuracy & Fluency • Vocabulary • Comprehension
Teacher Feedback “After so many years of teaching, I have gathered a lot of resources that are effective with my students. None of them were provided by the district. I am thrilled that the district is beginning to take literacy seriously and looking for a researched, tested approach to teaching and learning. I look forward to having sufficient common resources to meet the needs of all learners.” – First Grade Teacher http://myportal.bsd405.org/sites/Curriculum/literacy/Lists/K5%20Literacy%20Survey/overview.aspx
Evaluation Criteria for Programs • 5 Big Ideas – Reading Research • Balanced Literacy • Technology component that we could integrate into our current systems • Fully developed materials in Spanish • Consider availability of Pre-K
Reading First Recommended Programs Local school district recent adoptions Our district’s literacy instruction history and future goals Initial Review Committee
Work of the Review Committee • Assess both programs • Review student reading data • Consider teacher feedback • Communicate with all stakeholders
Review Committee: Assess Both Programs • Assess both programs using a curriculum evaluation tool • Dr. Marcy Stein – UW Tacoma, professor and researcher • Expertise in curriculum adoption and evaluation • Assist in development of tool that will help us compare and evaluate both programs
Review Committee: Data • Review student data gathered during the field study Pre and Post-Assessments • K-2: DIBELS and TRC BOY - August 30 – October 1 MOY - January 1 – January 31 • 3-5: MAP BOY – September 20 – October 7 MOY – January 25 – February 18
Review Committee: Teacher Feedback • Online survey through SharePoint (collected near the end of the field study) • In-person teacher testimony • Review Committee members will attend at least one field study meeting to listen to teacher discussion • Teachers will complete “Ease of Use” portion of evaluation tool
Review Committee: Communication • SharePoint site for field study teachers and BSD • BSD site for parent community / email form for feedback • Three parent information nights • Teachers share materials with parents during curriculum night • Emails to teachers and principals • Open trainings on both programs during ESI • Elementary Technology and Curriculum Coach support as another avenue for communicating with teachers
Review Committee: Voting and Reaching Consensus on a Program • Facilitators propose a model for consensus • 60% • Precedent set by math adoption • Fist to Five • 3 or above = ready to vote • THE VOTE • Once all members are 3 or above a vote will occur • If we do not reach consensus after first vote, return to discussion • Discussion continues until members are ready for another vote • This process continues until consensus is reached
The Last Task of the Review Committee • Make a recommendation to the Instructional Materials Committee