1 / 20

Forest Certification

Forest Certification. Solomon Islands . Solomon Islands. Solomon Islands. Total land area: 27,000 sq km dispersed over 800,000 sq km of sea Number of islands : 996 of which 350 are inhabited 90% of land under customary land ownership Population: 410,000 (386,000 in the village)

afi
Download Presentation

Forest Certification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Forest Certification Solomon Islands

  2. Solomon Islands

  3. Solomon Islands • Total land area: 27,000 sq km dispersed over 800,000 sq km of sea • Number of islands : 996 of which 350 are inhabited • 90% of land under customary land ownership • Population: 410,000 (386,000 in the village) • Main Exports – Logs, fish, copra, cocoa • GDP per capita - US$450 • Independence in 1978 with Westminster-style Parliamentary democracy • Three tiers government – Central, Provincial & Area Council

  4. Forest Industry • Major economic activity – export of round logs (80% of foreign exchange earnings) • Dominated by foreign logging companies some in partnership with local landowner companies • Current commercial natural forest area – 560,000 ha • Current rate of forest cut – 700,000 m3 / yr • Sustainable cut – 200 000 m3 / yr • Predicted national wood flow from natural forests will be exhausted by year 2018 • Current markets are insensitive to forest certification

  5. Stakeholders in Forest Logging Industry • Landowners - own the trees and grant timber rights • Logging companies (Foreign and Local) – apply for timber rights • Government – issue timber right license under Forest Resources and Timber Utilization Act 1970

  6. Measures to Control Logging • Government • - Code of logging practice 2002 • - Review of Forestry Act 2004 (in daft) • - Encourages plantation forestry • NGO’s/Landowners • - Awareness • - Community Forestry (saw milling & sustainable harvesting) • - Certification

  7. NGO Activities • Environmental conservation and environmental awareness • Village based eco-forestry involving selective harvesting and sawmilling • Marketing of processed forest products • Support for other village based and managed activities including eco-tourism, Non Timber Products and butterfly farming

  8. Initial support for certification • Support for forest certification came from NGO’s • - Unsustainable logging & land degradation, - Conflict among landowners - Logging undermines traditional economies, values and adversely affects the livelihoods of people • NGO’s & Landowners wants control logging activities, sustainable harvesting and maximum return from forest use • Little or no support from government

  9. Village Based Sawmilling (VBS) • NGO’s encouraged & promoted VBS among landowners prior to emergence of certification • Landowners benefited through employment and income • More interest and adoption of VBS among Landowners • NGO’s built on VBS to promote certification • Extra and heavy workload associated with certification discouraged landowners

  10. Organizations involved in certification • NGO’s - Solomon Western Island Fair Trade (SWIFT) – FSC - Soltrust - FSC - Solomon Islands Development Trust (SIDT) – Eco-timber - Natural Resources Development Foundation (NRDF) – Eco-timber • Landowners • Kolombangara Forest Products Limited (KFPL) - FSC • No Government involvement

  11. Market Impact • Higher price led to interest in certification by Landowners • NGO’s used reliable market outlets and higher price to promote certification • KFPL used certification because of the market demand and premium price for certified logs • Landowners did not produce consistently to maintain a regular supply to meet market demand. Landowners or timber producers only produced timber when they needed money

  12. Standard Setting • Soltrust developed its FAMP in partnership with landowners using FSC principles & Criteria to meet local needs • SWIFT’s whole forest management system was set up by forestry experts from Holland • SIEF developed Eco-timber standard in collaboration with ITTG (Market), Greenpeace, landowners

  13. SOLCERT- National Standard • Process initiated 1996/97 with the aim of defining a national FSC standard for community forestry • Formed in 1998 by with membership from NGO’s, Government and Forest Industry Association • Coordinate all certification related work among all stakeholders and set national standards. • Did not function as expected due to lack of coordination between the members and has remained ineffective since its formation in 1998

  14. SIEF eco-timber • Timber producers did not comply well with FAMP’s developed according to FSC standards. • Lessons learned forced SIEF to develop SIEF eco-timber (2nd party eco-timber verification) • SIEF eco-timber takes communities or producers step-by-step towards FSC standards; it’s a first step towards FSC certification • High cost of certification under FSC

  15. Road blocks & Challenges • Lack of awareness or knowledge among government authorities/decision makers & Landowners • Lack of government support for certification • Higher cost of certification • Heavy manual work involved • Landowners are not in a position to take up certification on their own • NGO’s programs are dependent on external funding

  16. Certification Issues • Certification of forest under customary ownership is the option for Solomon Islands (90 % of land under customary ownership) • No initiative from landowners - rely NGO’s who initially introduced and promoted certification • When NGO’s programs stopped, timber producers also stopped production • Government is not doing its part in promoting certification to support NGO’s

  17. Impact of certification • Some impact at community level • - logging stop in certain areas • - Build capacity, provide employment and income • No impact at national level • - no action and policy change

  18. Certification & Forestry Problems • Problems • - Unsustainable and illegal extraction of forest through logging • - Deforestation and loss of biodiversity through logging, shifting cultivation and forest clearance for plantation agriculture • Certification is not effectively addressing these forest problems at the present time

  19. Situation today • Soltrust & SWIFT ceased operation in 2000 and 2001 • SIDT (SIEF) in operation with 16,000 ha under its eco-timber program • NRDF started in 2003 using SIEF eco-timber label • KFPL only FSC certified has 40,000 ha of forest and plantation certified. • Foreign logging companies are well aware of certification but see it as an unnecessary business cost. Not until buyers/markets demand certified product will they change this position or SIG make it mandatory which is most unlikely. No body is pressing logging companies to adopt forest certification

  20. Future • Commitment from government, NGO’s, donor funding and markets for certification • Education Awareness among landowners to appreciate the direct benefit of certification and become proactive • Policy change from government push for certification on forest concession areas

More Related